Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Palaparthi Chitti Babu, vs The Narsapuram Municipality on 26 August, 2021

                        HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

MAIN CASE NO: Writ Petition No.18155 of 2021

                     PROCEEDING SHEET

  SL.     DATE                               ORDER                             OFFICE
  NO.                                                                           NOTE
        26.08.2021    MGR,J
                           Writ Petition No.18155 of 2021
                              Notice before admission.
                              Mr.M.Manohar            Reddy,       learned
                      standing       counsel        takes      notice    for
                      respondent        No.1,       learned       Assistant
                      Government Pleader for Revenue takes
                      notice for respondent No.2 and learned
                      Government         Pleader         for     Municipal
                      Administration takes notice for respondent
                      No.3 and waives further notice and seeks
                      time to file counter.
                              Post on 07.10.2021.


                                       IA.no.1 of 2021
                              Heard     learned       counsel     for    the
                      petitioners       and         learned       Assistant
                      Government       Pleader      appearing      for   the
                      respondents. Perused the record.
                              The case of the petitioners is that
                      they are the residents of Ward No.28 of
                      Narsapuram Municipality and petitioners 2
                      and 3 are the management of the affairs of
                      Sri Subrahmanyam Temple located in Ward
                      No.28    and     the    1st   respondent      of   the
                      Municipality      is    going      to    locate    and
                      construct Garbage Transfer Station (GST)
                      an extent of Ac.0.30 cents in R.S.No.546 of
                      Rustthumbada in Ward No.28 is illegal and
                      arbitrary.
                              Having    regard      to   the    facts    and
                      circumstances of the case and submissions
                      of learned counsel for the petitioners and
 SL.   DATE                    ORDER                          OFFICE
NO.                                                           NOTE
             on perusal of the record, this Court is
             prima facie satisfied that the petitioner has
             shown sufficient cause for granting an
             interim direction.
                   Accordingly, there shall be interim
             direction as prayed for.
             .

_______ MGR, J VSL