Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Jia Lal Khanna vs Jawahar Lal Khanna Tr.Lrs.. on 14 July, 2014

Ì
     1

               ITEM NO.38                              COURT NO.7                          SECTION XIV

                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F                        I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

               Petition(s) for           Special         Leave      to      Appeal     (C)......CC     No(s)
.
               16547-16548/2012

               (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated
               23.12.2011 and 02/03/2012 in RFA No. 70/2009 passed by the High
               Court Of Delhi At N. Delhi)

               JIA LAL KHANNA                                                               Petitioner(s)

                                                                   VERSUS

               JAWAHAR LAL KHANNA TR.LRS.& ORS.                                             Respondent(s)
               I.A. Nos. 1-2/2012(with c/delay in filing slp)


               Date : 14/07/2014 These applications were called on for hearing
                                 today.

               CORAM :
                                  HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
                                  HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL


               For Petitioner(s)          Mr. Subodh Kr. Pathak, Adv.
                                          for Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha,AOR(NP)

               For Respondent(s)          Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv.
                                          For Mr. Permanand Gaur, AOR(NP)

                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                  O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioner, when asked to assist this Court for the disposal of the controversy on merits, submits, that he has no instructions from the petitioner. He further submits, that despite repeated efforts, the petitioner Signature Not Verified has not contacted him, nor has responded to emails addressed by Digitally signed by Parveen Kumar Chawla Date: 2014.07.16 15:23:51 IST him to the petitioner.

Reason:

In view of the above, we are satisfied that the 2 petitioner is no longer interested to pursue the instant petition. The instant petition is, therefore, liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution. Ordered accordingly.
Even otherwise, on the concerned proposition of law, we find no infirmity in the conclusion drawn in paragraph 22 of the impugned order.
The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution, as also, on merits. (Parveen Kr. Chawla) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Assistant Registrar