Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Vikram Singh Chauhan on 21 April, 2016

Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, C. Nagappan

     CHAMBER MATTER                                                     SECTION IVA

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     R.P.(C) No. 1769/2016 In SLP(C) No. 33165/2015

     STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.                                   Petitioner(s)

                                                    VERSUS

     VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN                               Respondent(s)
     (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing review petition and office
     report)


     Date : 21/04/2016 This petition was circulated today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN

                                        By Circulation



                              UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

Delay of 64 days in filing the instant review petition is condoned.

The review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.

(Madhu Bala) (Madhu Narula) Court Master Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Meenakshi Kohli Date: 2016.04.21 16:43:57 IST Reason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1769 OF 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.33165 OF 2015 State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. … Petitioners versus Vikram Singh Chauhan … Respondent O R D E R Delay of 64 days in filing the instant review petition is condoned.

The instant petition for review has been filed by the petitioners against the dismissal of their special leave petition vide this Court’s order dated 4.9.2015. We have carefully perused the petition for review and the papers annexed in support thereof. We do not find any ground therein warranting reconsideration of the order impugned.

The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

.………………..……………….…....…J. (Jagdish Singh Khehar) ………………...…………………….…J. (C. Nagappan) New Delhi;

April 21, 2016.