Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

Sheena M.A. Aged 23 Years vs Union Of India Represented By Secretary on 8 April, 2009

Author: V.Giri

Bench: V.Giri

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 30263 of 2008(C)


1. SHEENA M.A. AGED 23 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.,

3. MRS. RAKHY SUNILKUMAR, AGE NOT KNOWN,

4. MRS.ROLLY K.J. AGE NOT KNOWN,

5. MRS. K.F.BEENA, AGE NOT KNOWN,

                For Petitioner  :SMT.SARITHA DAVID CHUNKATH

                For Respondent  :SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY, ADDL.CGSC

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :08/04/2009

 O R D E R
                                    V.GIRI
                     ----------------------------------------
                         W.P.(C)No.30263 of 2008
                    -----------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 8th day of April, 2009.

                                  JUDGMENT

The petitioner responded to a notification issued by the 2nd respondent inviting applications for the LPG Distributorship at Chazhoor in Thrissur District. The petitioner participated. Later, it was found that she was not selected and the 3rd respondent was selected.

2. According to the petitioner, excessive marks were awarded to the selected candidate, 3rd respondent. The petitioner's grievances have been highlighted in Ext.P7. It pending before the Territory Manager.

3. I heard learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Bharath Petroleum Corporation, the 2nd respondent.

In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P7 and take appropriate decision thereon, after notice to the petitioner as also the selected candidate. The petitioner shall be given an opportunity of hearing before a decision is taken on Ext.P7. The same shall be done within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

(V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/-

//true copy//