Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Onmobile Global Ltd on 30 September, 2024

Author: S.G.Pandit

Bench: S.G.Pandit

                                                -1-
                                                         NC: 2024:KHC:41209-DB
                                                              ITA No. 470 of 2023




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                         DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

                                             PRESENT
                              THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
                                               AND
                            THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
                              INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 470 OF 2023
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
                         3RD FLOOR, C R BUILDING,
                         QUEENS ROAD,
                         BENGALURU 560001

                   2.    THE ASST. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
                         OF INCOME TAX
                         CIRCLE 5 (1) (2),
                         PRESENT ADDRESS DCIT,
                         CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 (2),
                         3RD FLOOR, C R BUILDING,
                         QUEENS ROAD,
                         BENGALURU 560001
Digitally signed                                                     ...APPELLANTS
by BHARATHI
S                  (BY SRI. DILIP M.,ADVOCATE A/W
Location: HIGH         SRI. RAVIRAJ Y V, ADVOCATE)
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                   AND:

                   ONMOBILE GLOBAL LTD
                   TOWER #1, 94/1C AND 94/2,
                   VEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
                   ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
                   ELECRONICS CITY, PHASE 1,
                   BENGALURU 560100
                   PAN AAACO 3900E
                                                                    ...RESPONDENT
                   (BY SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR.,ADVOCATE)
                             -2-
                                     NC: 2024:KHC:41209-DB
                                       ITA No. 470 of 2023




      THIS ITA / INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A
OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE
SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN, ALLOW THE
APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN MP NO. 58/BANG/2023 (IN
IT(TP)A   NO.    2560/BANG/2019)  DATED    31/03/2023   FOR
ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-2016 ANNEXURE-E AND CONFIRM THE
ORDER OFF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE
ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU AND ETC.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING,         THIS   DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
          and
          HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

                    ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Heard the learned counsel Sri. Dilip. M., along with Sri. Raviraj Y.V., for appellants/Revenue and learned counsel Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar., learned counsel for the respondent/assessee.

2. The Revenue is in appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act') questioning the correctness and legality of order dated 31.03.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Bengaluru (for short, 'Appellate Authority') in -3- NC: 2024:KHC:41209-DB ITA No. 470 of 2023 MP No.58/Bang/2023 (IT(TP)A No.260/Bang/2019 for the assessment year 2015-16, raising the following substantial questions of law:

"1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in allowing the deduction of tax paid on outside India under section 40A(ia) of the Act by holding that tax paid outside India would be outside the ambit of definition of tax as defined in Section 2(43) of the Act ignoring that same is not allowable as the tax paid in India is Nil and allowing deduction would amount to paying the same from Government Treasury in the absence of any tax paid in India?
2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law not appreciating the fact that assessing authority rightly made disallowance under section 40
(a)(ia) of the Act as conditions for invoking same are satisfied?"

3. Learned counsel for the assessee submits that the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.2 Crores and therefore, the appeal should not be entertained at the instance of the revenue in view of the Circular No.09/2024 -4- NC: 2024:KHC:41209-DB ITA No. 470 of 2023 dated 17.09.2024 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. It is also submitted that the aforesaid Circular binds the revenue.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the revenue submits that he be granted liberty to revive the appeal in case the matter falls within the exceptions under the aforesaid Circular dated 17.09.2024 and Circular No.5/2024 dated 15.03.2024.

5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the appeal is disposed of with liberty as prayed for by the learned counsel for the revenue. However, the question of law is kept open to be adjudicated in an appropriate proceeding.

Sd/-

(S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/-

(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE BS - List No.: 4 Sl No.: 40