Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Nirmal Ujjwal Coop. Credit Society vs Maharashtra State Coop. Bank Ltd &5 Ors on 8 July, 2014

Ú                                                       1


         ITEM NO.Chamber                                          Section IX

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

             R.P.(C) No. 1216-1217/2014 In C.A. No. 6832-6833/2013

             NIRMAL UJJWAL COOP. CREDIT SOCIETY                         Petitioner(s)

                                                      VERSUS

         MAHARASHTRA STATE COOP. BANK LTD &5 ORS                       Respondent(s)

         (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing review petition and office
         report)


         Date : 08/07/2014 This petition was circulated today.

         CORAM:

                             HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.THAKUR
                             HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN


                                 By Circulation



                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

Delay condoned.

The review petitions are dismissed in terms of the signed order.

(Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ( The Signed Order is placed on the file.) Shashi Sareen Date: 2014.07.16 04:25:56 ALMT Reason: 2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (C) NOS. 1216-1217 OF 2014 IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6832-6833 OF 2013 Nirmal Ujjwal Co-operative Credit Society, through its Secretary Nagpur ...Petitioner Versus Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. through its Manager, Nagpur and 5 Others ...Respondents ORDER There is delay of 18 days in filing of the review petition which is, hereby, condoned.

We have examined the grounds urged in support of the prayer for review. We find no error apparent on the face of the record to warrant recall of our order dated 19th August, 2013. The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.

.............................................J .

(T.S. THAKUR) ............................................... J. New Delhi (VIKRAMAJIT SEN) July 8, 2014