Manoj Kumar Natwadiya S/O Shri Harphool ... vs Union Of India on 25 August, 2023

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Manoj Kumar Natwadiya S/O Shri Harphool ... vs Union Of India on 25 August, 2023

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2023/RJJP/011482]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26389/2018

Sitaram S/o Shri Nekiram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o-Dhani
Bhootala, Village Post Sihodi, Via Thoi, Tehsil Shrimadhopur,
District Sikar (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2408003213
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretariate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20184/2018
Rajendra Kumar S/o Shri Kalu Ram, Aged About 25 YearsR/o
Village- And Post Bakara, Tehshil Jhunjhunu District Jhunjhunu
Rajasthan Roll No. 2405506415
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India, Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region, Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26390/2018
Ramawatar Jat S/o Shri Sheri Laxman Ram, Aged About 26
Years, R/o - Dhani Haritwal Ki , Village -Garthtaknet, Tehshil
Shrimadhopur ,district Sikar , Raj
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (2 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26391/2018
1. Krishan S/o Shri Ram Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/0
Village -Tatija Tehshil Khetri Diistrict Jhunjhunu
(Rajasthan )
2. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Mohar Singh, Aged About 25 Years,
R/0 Village And Post Charawas Tehshil Khetri Diistrict
Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26392/2018
Manoj Kumar Natwadiya S/o Shri Harphool Singh, Aged About 28
Years, R/o - Dhani Hanuman Sagar, Village -Garthtaknet, Via
Ajeetgarh, Tehsil Shrimadhopur ,district Sikar (Rajasthan) Roll
No. 2405011098
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26393/2018
Narendra Singh S/o Shri Khayaliram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o -
Village Post Togda Khurd, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (3 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26394/2018
Rajaram Meena S/o Shri Durgalal Meena, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o - Village Datunda, Post Ghaad, Tehsil Dooni, District Tonk
(Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26395/2018
Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Jawahar Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
- Village Post Jodha Ka Bas, Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu
(Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26396/2018
Rajendra Kumar Nehra S/o Shri Mohan Lal Nehra, Aged About 30
Years, R/o - Dhani Samli, Village Pritampura, Tehsil Neem Ka
Thana District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (4 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26397/2018
Dilip Jajara S/o Shri Gogaram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o -
Village Baggar, Tehsil Riya Badi, District Nagaur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26398/2018
Shivaji Lal Jat S/o Shri Goga Lal Jat, Aged About 27 Years, R/o -
Village Karimpura, Post Dakhiya, Tehsil And District Tonk (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26399/2018
Sushil Kumar Nehra S/o Shri Dhanna Ram Nehra, Aged About 29
Years, R/o - Village Hameerpura (Khurd), Post Sola, Via Jajodar
(Khedi), District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (5 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26400/2018
Rupsingh Meena S/o Shri Meetha Lal Meena, Aged About 28
Years, R/o - Village Khawa, Post Rawal, District Swai Madhopur
(Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26401/2018
Pradeep Singh Hada S/o Shri Gauri Sankar Hada, Aged About 24
Years, R/o - Village And Post Khareda, Tehsil Todaraisingh,
District Tonk (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2407502669
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26402/2018
Hemraj S/o Shri Kailash Chand Gurjar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
- Nangal Panditpura, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (6 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26403/2018
Surendra Kumar S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 26 Years,
R/o- Village Kalyanpura, Tehsil Shri Madhopur, District Sikar
(Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26404/2018
Anil Kumar S/o Shri Dan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o -
Village Neharo Ki Dhani Kolsiya, Post Barwasi, Tehsil Nawalgarh
District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26405/2018
Mukesh Meena S/o Shri Prahalad Meena, Aged About 34 Years,
R/o -Village Ramnagar, Post Kabara, Tehsil And District Tonk
(Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Blokc No. 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (7 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26406/2018
Dinesh S/o Shri Ram Prasad, Aged About 26 Years, R/o-Village
Post Guhana, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26407/2018
Sandeep Kumar Get S/o Shri Prakash Chand Get, Aged About 28
Years, R/o- Village Post Jaisinghpura, Tehsil Kotputli District
Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26408/2018
Deshraj Jat S/o Shri Prabhu Dayal Jat, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
Karwas Post Jaisinghpura, Tehsil Kotputli District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No. 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (8 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26409/2018
Mukesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Banshi Dhar Saini, Aged About 28
Years, R/o - Dhani Kala Bhata, Post Pachlangi, Tehsil
Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26410/2018
Ramkran Singh S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 29 Years,
R/o - Village Banka, Post Gopalpura, Tehsil Kotputli, District
Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26411/2018
Ram Avatar S/o Shri Ramchand, Aged About 28 Years, R/o -
Village Dholorao Kalan, Post Morara, Tehsil Medta City, District
Nagaur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (9 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26412/2018
Mukesh Kumar Bajia S/o Shri Sada Ram Bajia, Aged About 29
Years, R/o-Village Dadiyaram, Vai Reengush, Tehsil
Shrimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26413/2018
Hitesh Kumar Saidawat S/o Shri Hansraj Saidawat, Aged About
28 Years, R/o-Village Post Lili, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Alwar
(Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26414/2018
Rakesh Kumar Gurjar S/o Shri Mungaram Gurjar, Aged About 31
Years, R/o-Nanuwali Bawari (Tesilawali), Post And Tehsil Khetri,
District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2405543443
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (10 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26415/2018
Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Phulla Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o -
Village Harmeerpura Kala, Post Samarthpura, Tehsil Khandela,
District Sikar (Raj.) Roll No. 2405029560
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26416/2018
Mukesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Suraj Mal Meena, Aged About 30
Years, R/o - Village Dhuva Khurd, Post Dhuva Kalan, Tehsil
Dooni, District Tonk (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26417/2018
Suraj Mal S/o Shri Teja Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village
Post Kalyanpura (Thoi), District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26418/2018

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (11 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Gajaraj Singh S/o Shri Prem Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o -
Village Mangrain Kala, Post Singhaniya, Tehsil Bayana, District
Bharatpur (Raj.) Roll No. 2405505914
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26419/2018
Ramji Lal Haritwal S/o Shri Prabhu Dayal Jat, Aged About 28
Years, R/o - Dhani Lakhawali, Village Hanutpura Via Amarsar,
Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26420/2018
1. Mukesh Gurjar S/o Shri Dataram Gurjar, Aged About 32
Years, R/o - Village Post Paniyala, Tehsil Kotputli, District
Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Mahesh Kumar Rawat S/o Shri Dev Karan Rawat, Aged
About 31 Years, R/o - Village Post Paniyala, Tehsil
Kotputli, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (12 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26421/2018
Ummed Raj Thori S/o Shri Badari Lal Thori, Aged About 28
Years, R/o - Village Arniya Kaidar (Jhopda), Tehsil And District
Tonk (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26422/2018
Mukesh Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Baluram Yadav, Aged About 31
Years,R/o - Village Nare, Post Hardaswas, Via Jhadali, Tehsil
Shrimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26423/2018
Sumer Singh S/o Shri Vinod Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o -
Village Post Chirana, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (13 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26424/2018
Mukesh Kumar Gurjar S/o Shri Palaram Gurjar, Aged About 28
Years, R/o - Village Jhodhpura, Post Hanutpura, Via Amarsar,
Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26425/2018
Anil Kumar S/o Shri Vipati Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o -Uvar,
Post Sogar, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) Roll
No. 2402518644
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26426/2018
Sandeep Kumar Khichar S/o Shri Indraj Singh Khichar, Aged
About 28 Years, R/o- Village Anandpura, Post Kant, V Ia Alsisar,
District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (14 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26427/2018
Sunil Kumar Saini S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh Saini, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Village Post Kishorpura, Dhani Khokharawali Via Pokh,
Tehsil Udaipurvati District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26428/2018
Omprakash S/o Shri Pusaram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o -
Village Khanadi, Post Daudsar, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur
(Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26429/2018
Prahalad Singh S/o Shri Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o - Village Dhaka Ka Bass, Post Bhagera, Tehsil Nawalgarh,
District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (15 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26430/2018
1. Sunil Kulhari S/o Shri Dharampal Kulhari, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Nayabas, Post Sankhantal,
Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2405017359
2. Vijendra S/o Shri Dayanand Kulhari, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Nayabas, Post Sankhantal,
Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2405516341
3. Sarjeet Singh S/o Shri Munshiram, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
Roll No. 2405515879
4. Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Banshidhar, Aged About 31 Years,
Resident Of Bansiyawal, Tehsil Khetdi, District Jhunjhunu
(Rajasthan) Roll No. 2405545939
5. Omprakash Swami S/o Shri Bhairu Ram Swami, Aged
About 26 Years, , Resident Of Dhani Nada, Village Bhuri
Bhadaj, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2405018258
6. Naresh Pal Yadav S/o Shri Hanuman Sahay Yadav, Aged
About 29 Years, , Resident Of Bagawas Ahiran, Tehsil
Virat Nagar, Via Bhawaru, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) Roll
No. 2405026294
7. Ram Kishore S/o Shri Hari Ram, Aged About 25 Years,
Resident Of Village Post Sanju, Tehsil Degana, District
Nagaur (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2401001389
8. Sanvariya Lal Choudhary S/o Shri Badri Lal, Aged About
26 Years, Resident Of Village Khareda, Tehsil
Todaraisingh, District Tonk (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2405550351
9. Bhunesh Singh Rajpoot S/o Shri Amar Singh, Aged About
26 Years, Resident Of Village Khera Tarf Bahatu, Post
Bahatu Kalan, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar (Rajasthan)
Roll No. 2402504945
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of Of India, Through The Secretary Home
Department Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi
India.

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (16 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26432/2018
Jitendra Kumar S/o Shri Sukhdevaram, Aged About 25 Years,
R/o Jaisinghpura, Via Badwasi Tehsil Navalgarh, District
Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26433/2018
Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Mamchand, Aged About 25 Years, R/o -
Village Kalyanpura Via Thoi, Tehsil Shri Madhopur District Sikar
(Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26434/2018
Mahesh Kumar Swami S/o Shri Lal Chand Swami, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Tehsil Kotputli, Dhani Samadawali, Bhuri Bharaj,
Bharaj Bhuree, Jaipur, Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (17 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26435/2018
Sohan Ram Chandeliya S/o Shri Dalaram, Aged About 29 Years,
R/o Village Mevda, Tehsil Degana, District Nagaur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26437/2018
Jairam Saini S/o Shri Banwari Lal Saini, Aged About 33 Years,
R/o Village Guda Ponkh, Tehsil Udaipurvati District Jhunjhunu
(Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26438/2018
Anil Kumar S/o Shri Ram Kumar Sura, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
- Village Khatehpura, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
Roll No. 2406511813
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (18 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Region, Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26439/2018
1. Atar Singh S/o Shri Kaniram, Aged About 29 Years,
Resident Of Village Morochi, Post Nibhaira, Tehsil Sapotra,
District Karauli (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2405521568
2. Ramkishan S/o Shri Kannya, Aged About 26 Years,
Resident Of Village Ranoth, Tehsil Mundawar, District
Alwar (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2402509740
3. Sandeep Kumar Poonia S/o Shri Nemichand, Aged About
30 Years, Resident Of Village Mohabbatsari, Post
Ghoriwara Khurd, Via Mukundgarh, Tehsil Nawalgarh,
District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2409000121
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26440/2018
Mukesh Kumar Gurjar S/o Shri Ramji Lal Gurjar, Aged About 26
Years, R/o - Village Maniyala, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur
(Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26441/2018
1. Dinesh Kumar Swami, S/o Shri Chhotu Ram Swami, Aged
About 31 Years, Resident Of Village Beniyon Ka Bas, Post

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:40 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (19 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Manda Surera, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar
(Rajasthan) - 332742. Roll No. 2405545297
2. Madan Lal Tetarwal, S/o Shri Ramgopal Tetarwal, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Tetwar Walon Ki Dhani, Vpo
Padasoli, Tehsil Dudu, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). Roll No.
2401505897
3. Khushi Ram Meena S/o Shri Prabhu Dayal Meena, Aged
About 29 Years, Resident Of Village Post Khoh Dareeba,
Tehsil And District Alwar (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2402514307
4. Hajari Ram S/o Shri Bodu Ram Rewar, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Post Rajod, Tehsil Jayal, District
Nagaur (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2405559989
5. Surendra Kumar Swami S/o Shri Padamaram, Aged About
27 Years, Resident Of Village Bhawal Desar, Post
Dhansiya, Tehsil Nohar District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan)
Roll No. 2404003229
6. Pradeep Sharma S/o Shri Shimbhoo Dayal Sharma, Aged
About 28 Years, , Resident Of Village Kharwasa Ki Dhani,
Post Guda Godji, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2405519382
7. Ashok Siyag S/o Shri Ram Niwas Siyag, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Village Post Tawara, Tehsil Jayal
District Nagaur (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2401506939
8. Bhagirath Mal Jakhar S/o Shri Gopal Lal Jakhar, Aged
About 32 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 4, Rulana, Village
Post Rulana, Tehsil Kotaramgarh, District Sikar
(Rajasthan) Roll No. 2405557522
9. Jeetram Choudhary S/o Shri Baijnath Choudhary, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Post Sawariya, Tehsil
Todaraisingh, District Tonk (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2401507707
10. Natwar Singh S/o Shri Khem Singh, Aged About 29 Years,
Resident Of Village Village And Post Khatoti, Tehsil
Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2407502078
11. Mukesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Shyam Lal Saini, Aged
About 27 Years, Resident Of Bansoor Road, Chungi Naka
Ke Pass, Ward No. 30 Kotputli District Jaipur (Rajasthan)
Roll No. 2402004303

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (20 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

12. Ranjeet Singh Saini S/o Shri Ramkaran Saini, Aged About
29 Years, Resident Of Gaushala Ke Piche, Tapri Road,
Dhani Tob Ka Tila, Kotputli District Jaipur (Rajasthan) Roll
No. 2405019485
13. Amar Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Khyali Ram Gurjar, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Tapri Road, Ward No. 30
Kotputli District Jaipur (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2402001363
14. Rajesh Kumar S/o Shri Teekam Singh, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Village Post Singhaniya, Tehsil Bayana,
District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2402520027
15. Yogesh Kumar S/o Shri Pratap Singh, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of Village Hameerwas (Lamba), Post
Lamba, Via Bagad, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) Roll
No. 2404000688
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26442/2018
Prathviraj Gurjar S/o Shri Shivraj Gurjar, Aged About 29 Years,
R/o - Village Yakubganj, Post Kabara, Tehsil Tonk, District Tonk
(Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region, Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26443/2018
1. Vijaypal Punia, S/o Shri Vidhyadhar Punia, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Nabipura, Via Beswa, Tehsil

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (21 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Fatehpur, District Sikar (Rajasthan) 332303. Roll No.
2404002074
2. Durgadas Swami, S/o Shri Sitaram Swami, Aged About
28 Years, Resident Of Village Daulatpura, Post Manda-
Bhinda, Via Govindgarh, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur
(Rajasthan)-303712. Roll No. 2406517725
3. Krishan Kumar Meena, S/o Shri Mangej Ram Meena, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of Khirod, Vpo Khirod, Tehsil
Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2401511325
4. Sitaram Meena, S/o Shri Habuda Meena, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Devali, Tehsil Lalsot, District
Dausa (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2405024947
5. Richpal Mundel, S/o Shri Arjaram Mundel, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Mundelpura, Post Harsor, Tehsil
Degana, District Nagour (Rajasthan). Roll No.
2401502764
6. Jagram Meena, S/o Shri Girraj Meena, Aged About 32
Years, Resident Of Village Nondpura, Post Takholi, Tehsil
Uniyara, District Tonk (Rajasthan). Roll No. 2405565911
7. Praveen Kumar Sharma, S/o Shri Ramjilal Sharma, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Shrirampura, Post
Devali, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa (Rajasthan). Roll No.
2405528156
8. Gopiram Sahu, S/o Shri Sohanlal Sahu, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Repatunda, Tehsil Taranagar,
District Churu (Rajasthan). Roll No. 2404004003
9. Chotelal Jogi, S/o Shri Prabhudayal Jogi, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Bagdeda, Post Bhawata, Tehsil
Baswa, District Dausa (Rajasthan)-303325. Roll No.
2405538240
10. Pradhan Kumar Devenda, S/o Shri Shankar Lal Devanda,
Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Village Madhoganj, Post
Baseda, Tehsil Todaraisingh, District Tonk (Rajasthan) -
304505. Roll No. 2405517775
11. Hansraj Choudhary, S/o Shri Shankar Lal Choudhary,
Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Vpo Chandlai, Tehsil
Tonk, District Tonk (Rajasthan) - 304001. Roll No.
2405527890

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (22 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

12. Dalip Kumar, S/o Shri Karni Ram, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Vpo Bugala, Via Jakhal, Tehsil Nawalgarh,
District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) - 333305. Roll No.
2406003025
13. Rakesh Kumar, S/o Shri Ghisaram, Aged About 29 Years,
Resident Of Vpo Bugala, Via Jakhal, Tehsil Nawalgarh,
District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) - 333305. Roll No.
2406004077
14. Rajesh, S/o Shri Phoolchand Nijar, Aged About 26 Years,
Resident Of Vpo Godaron Ka Bas (Bhorki), Tehsil
Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) - 333032.
Roll No. 2404502260
15. Abhishek Kumar, S/o Shri Pratap Singh, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Vpo Rooppura, Post Kuloth Khurd,
Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) -
333033. Roll No. 2405027804
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of Of India, Through The Secretary Home
Department Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi
India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26444/2018
Mukesh Kumar Samota S/o Shri Mamraj Singh Samota, Aged
About 29 Years, R/o - Dhani Jhari, Post Jairampura, Via
Srimadhopur, District Sikar (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2405531283
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26445/2018

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (23 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Motiram S/o Shri Ramdev Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o -
Village Post Kundari, Tehsil Parbatsar, District Nagaur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26446/2018
Lekhraj Gurjar S/o Shri Devi Lal Gurjar, Aged About 29 Years,
R/o - Village Sainiwas, Post Kakalwar, Tehsil Todaraisingh District
Tonk (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26447/2018
1. Anil Kumar S/o Shri Mahaveer, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
- Togra Khurd, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
Roll No. 2405007003
2. Gopal Guleriya S/o Shri Uma Ram Guleriya, Aged About
28 Years, R/o Ladriya Tehsil Deedwana, District Nagaur
(Rajasthan) Roll No. 2401000470
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (24 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26448/2018
Kanhaiya Lal Gurjar S/o Shri Ladu Lal Gurjar, Aged About 29
Years, R/o - Village Mohommad Nagar, Post Palada, Tehsil And
District Tonk (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26452/2018
Jitendra Singh Dhakar S/o Shri Gopi Lal Dhakar, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Thali, Post Bharni, Tehsil And District Tonk
(Rajasthan) Roll No. 2406511374
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region, Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26453/2018
1. Vishan Singh, S/o Shri Hanuman Singh Shekhawat, Aged
About 26 Years, , Resident Of Village Narsingh Chowk,
Post Rajnauta, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur (Rajasthan)-
303110. Roll No. 2402007344
2. Sohan Lal Choudhary, S/o Shri Jai Singh, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village - Dulhepura, Post - Hod, Tehsil
- Khandela, District- Sikar (Rajasthan)-332709. Roll No.
2405512449
3. Rakesh Kumar Kumawat, S/o Shri Ramawtar Kumawat,
Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village - Dulhepura,
Post - Hod, Tehsil - Khandela, District- Sikar (Rajasthan)-
332709. Roll No. 2406001468

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (25 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

4. Ratan Lal Meena, S/o Shri Girdhari Lal Meena, Aged
About 34 Years, Resident Of Vpo - Nangal, Ward No. 1,
Tehsil - Udaipurwati, District - Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) -
333307. Roll No. 2406003265
5. Kamlesh Kumar Kumawat, S/o Shri Kailash Chand
Kumawat, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Vpo - Gokul
Ka Bas, Tehsil - Khandela, District- Sikar (Rajasthan) -
332709. Roll No. 2405027786
6. Sanwar Mal Meena, S/o Shri Shreeram Meena, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Vpo - Todpura, Tehsil -
Nawalgarh, District - Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). Roll No.
2405026949
7. Manoj Kumar Swami, S/o Shri Shankar Lal Swami, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Village - Kanarpura, Via -
Kaladera, Tehsil - Chomu, District - Jaipur (Rajasthan).
Roll No. 2405563672
8. Mukesh Kumar, S/o Shri Pyarelal, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Vpo - Kairu, Tehsil - Nawalgarh, District -
Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). Roll No. 2405561321
9. Raju Lal Jat, S/o Shri Lalaram Jat, Aged About 26 Years,
Resident Of Vpo - Dantri, Tehsil - Dudu, District - Jaipur
(Rajasthan)-303008. Roll No. 2401502403
10. Shyodan Ghatala, S/o Shri Ramswaroop Choudhary, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Village - Gahlota, Tehsil -
Dudu, District - Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 303008. Roll No.
2401512348
11. Panna Lal, S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal Dhayal, Aged About
29 Years, Resident Of Vpo - Banoora, Via - Khud, Tehsil -
Danta Ramgarh, District - Sikar (Rajasthan) - 332023.
Roll No. 2406502579
12. Brij Mohan Swami, S/o Shri Moolchand Swami, Aged
About 32 Years, Resident Of Vpo - Bhuri Bhadaj, Tehsil -
Kotputli, District - Jaipur (Rajasthan). Roll No.
2405012757
13. Onkar Ram, S/o Shri Rama Ram, Aged About 29 Years,
Resident Of Vpo - Rajlota, Tehsil - Degana, District -
Nagaur (Rajasthan) - 341503. Roll No. 2401511967
14. Choutharam, S/o Shri Lumba Ram, Aged About 29 Years,
Resident Of Vpo - Sathin, Via - Pipar City, Tehsil - Pipad

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (26 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

City, District - Jodhpur (Rajasthan) - 342601. Roll No.
2406518797
15. Mana Ram, S/o Shri Ganga Vishan, Aged About 29 Years,
Resident Of Vpo - Sathin, Via - Pipar City, Tehsil - Pipad
City, District - Jodhpur (Rajasthan) - 342601. Roll No.
2406507088
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of Of India, Through The Secretary Home
Department Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi
India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26455/2018
Mahendra Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Shivlal Gurjar, Aged About 27
Years, R/o - Village Banka, Post Gopalpura, Tehsil Kotputli,
District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26457/2018
1. Ganpat Ram, S/o Shri Lichhman Ram Lamror, Aged About
29 Years, Resident Of Village Surpura, Post Bikharniya
Kalla, Tehsil Degana, District Nagour (Rajasthan)-341031.
Roll No. 2401505457
2. Govind Jat, S/o Shri Ramdev Jat, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Vpo Sursura, Tehsil Kishangarh, District
Ajmer (Rajasthan)-305801. Roll No. 8000029600
3. Mukesh Jyani, S/o Shri Sharvan Jyani, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Gehlota, Tehsil Dudu, District

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (27 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 303008. Roll No. 2401512996
4. Sultan Singh Meena, S/o Shri Bhag Chand Meena, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Vpo Makha, Via Narena,
Tehsil Dudu, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). Roll No.
2401516136
5. Shyoraj Jat, S/o Shri Nanda Ram Jat, Aged About 30
Years, Resident Of Vpo Sirohi Kalan, Tehsil Dudu, District
Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 303008. Roll No. 2401506103
6. Mukesh Kumar Bijarnia, S/o Shri Prahlad Ram Bijarnia,
Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Bijarnia Ki
Dhani, Post Singrawat, District Nagaur (Rajasthan). Roll
No. 2401000905
7. Shivdan Godara, S/o Shri Mangi Lal, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of Village Sardarpura Khurd, Via Beri
Chhoti, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan). Roll
No. 2404501095
8. Ramniwas, S/o Shri Mangi Lal, Aged About 31 Years,
Resident Of Village Sardarpura Khurd, Via Beri Chhoti,
Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan)-341551. Roll
No. 2405015961
9. Sandeep Kumar Meel, S/o Shri Omprakash Meel, Aged
About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Milo Ka Bass, Post
Barwasi, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu
(Rajasthan)-333042. Roll No. 2405026087
10. Rakesh Kumar, S/o Shri Mangi Lal, Aged About 26 Years,
Resident Of Vpo Nalwa, Via Mandrela, Tehsil Chirawa,
District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) - 333025. Roll No.
2404003678
11. Jugal Kishor, S/o Shri Ramdeva Ram, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Village Hukampura, Post Singrawat,
Tehsil Dhodh, District Sikar (Rajasthan) - 332030. Roll
No. 2405511225
12. Nemichand Bagariya, S/o Shri Chothu Ram Bagariya,
Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Sarwadi, Via
Singrawat, Tehsil Dhodh, District Sikar (Rajasthan) -
332030. Roll No. 2401003089
13. Harish Chandra, S/o Shri Banwari Lal, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Vpo Lalpur, Via Bagar, Tehsil And
District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) - 333023. Roll No.

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (28 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

2405515639
14. Ajeet Singh, S/o Shri Mohar Singh, Aged About 30 Years,
Resident Of Vpo Ghardana Kalan, Tehsil Buhana, District
Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) - 333516. Roll No. 2404510267
15. Krishan Kumar, S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of Vpo Ghardana Kalan, Tehsil Buhana,
District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) - 333516. Roll No.
2409000485
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 190/2019
Subhash Chand Yadav S/o Sanwal Ram Yadav, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Dhani Chetakiin, Village Pritampuri, Tehsil Neem Ka
Thana, District-Sikar (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2409506130
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 541/2019
Vikash Kumar Boran S/o Shri Man Singh, Aged About 25 Years,
R/o - Poopa Ka Bas, Post- Chichroli, Tehsil Khetri District
Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan), Roll No. 24072508231
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi Inida.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (29 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Region Block No. 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1644/2019
Ramesh Chand Yadav S/o Shri Madan Lal Yadav, Aged About 30
Years, Resident Of Dhani Shree Kishan Wala, Village Post Sirohi
Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2405554904
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi
India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1906/2019
Sagar Mal S/o Shri Mothu Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o -
Dhani Saran Ki, Village Kalyanpura Via Thoi Tehsil Sri Madhopur,
District Sikar (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2401002593
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi
India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2295/2019
1. Vinod Kumar Meena S/o Shri Mahadev Ram Meena, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Dumoli, Post Jhiri,
Tehsil Thanagaji, District Alwar (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2402005094
2. Rahul Kumar S/o Shri Bhagwana Ram, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of Post Anokhu, Tehsil Dhond District
Sikar (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2405025626
3. Ramavtar Meena S/o Shri Mahadev Meena, Aged About

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (30 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

31 Years, Resident Of Village Dumoli, Post Jhiri, Tehsil
Thanagaji, District Alwar (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2405023429
4. Shriram Sharma S/o Shri Kishan Lal Sharma, Resident Of
Vpo Lunwa, Post Nawa District Nagaur (Rajasthan) Roll
No.2405528202
5. Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Shubhash Chand, Resident Of
Village Bachia Ki Dhani, Post Arooka, District Jhunjhunu
(Rajasthan) Roll No. 2405000210
6. Surendra Kumar Borakh S/o Shri Prahalad Ram Borakh,
Resident Of Village Bandpura (Shivnagas), Post Guhala,
Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2405557897
7. Bhagirath Singh Jat S/o Shri Bholu Ram Jat, Resident Of
Village Machharkhani, Post Jorpura (Jobner), Tehsil
Phulera, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2405010656
8. Lokesh Mitharwal S/o Shri Prabhu Dayal Mitharwal,
Resident Of Village Fatehpura, Post Tiwadi Ki Dhani No. 2,
Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2405023408
9. Dev Prakash S/o Shri Jaswant Kumar, Resident Of Bada
Mohalla, Vpo Kaman, Tehsil Kaman, District Bharatpur
(Rajasthan) Roll No. 2402520375
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No. 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Dlehi-
1100003, India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2565/2019
1. Kailash Chand S/o Shri Tota Ram, Aged About 32 Years,
Obc Resident Of Village Bagheri Khurd, Tehsil Katkasim,
District Alwar (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2402518987
2. Babli Ram S/o Shri Chetram, Aged About 30 Years,
Resident Of Village Mojdeeka, Tehsil And District Alwar
(Rajasthan) Roll No. 2402515493

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (31 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

3. Sandeep Kumar S/o Shri Rajendra Kumar Ghaseel, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Dasa Ki Dhani, Post
Gokulpura, District Sikar (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2405023429
4. Vikas Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Bodan Ram Yadav, Aged
About 31 Years, Resident Of Mazri Khola, Post Padmada
Khurd, Tehsil Mudawar, District Alwar (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2402512631
5. Hemraj Dhakar S/o Shri Jagdish Dhakar, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Village Sohanpura, Post Lallai, Via
Sarwar, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2401508333
6. Deshraj Meena S/o Shri Harphool Meena, Aged About 27
Years, Category St Resident Of Village Sanwatsar, Post
Jhiri, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2405015333
7. Sandeep Kumar S/o Shri Sohan Lal, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Village Mundia Khera, Post Chikani, Tehsil And
District Alwar (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2408501379
8. Sona Ram S/o Shri Ram, Aged About 25 Years, Resident
Of Village Gurda Dang, Post Sahpur, Tehsil Bayana,
District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2405500159
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No. 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4265/2019
1. Ramratan Meena Son Of Prahalad Sahai Meena, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Malera, Post Jatawali,
Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur (Raj.) Roll No. 2405522138.
2. Devi Ram Yadav Son Of Damodar Lal, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Vpo Jaishari, Tehsil Nagar Distt.
Bharatpur, Rajasthan Roll No. 2402502123.
3. Iliyas Khan Son Of Noor Mohammad, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Buttiyana, Tehsil Laxmangarh,

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (32 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Distt. Alwar, Rajasthan 301021, Roll No. 2402001920
4. Bhagwan Saini Son Of Param Ram Saini, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Village Rambas, Tehsil Govindgarh,
Distt. Alwar, Rajasthan 301604, Roll No.2402509469
5. Suresh Chand Meena Son Of Suraj Ram Meena, Aged
About 29 Years, Resident Of Village Buttiyana, Tehsil
Axmangarh, Distt. Alwar, Rajasthan 301021, Roll No.
2402001986
6. Bhagu Ram Son Of Narsha Ram, Aged About 31 Years,
Village Dhani Vpo Megsar, Tehsil Taranagar, Distt. Churu,
Rajasthan 331304,roll No. 2404003525.
7. Shailendra Son Of Maru Ram, Aged About 26 Years,
Resident Of Gudia, Tehsil Nohar, Distt. Hanumangarh,
Rajasthan 335523, Roll No. 2408000799.
8. Dalip Kumar Son Of Balvir Singh, Aged About 30 Years,
Resident Of Gudia, Tehsil Nohar, Distt. Hanumangarh,
Rajasthan 335523, Roll No. 2406504449.
9. Rakesh Kumar Son Of Balveer Singh, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Khundiya Bass, Post- Rampura
Beri, Tehsil- Rajgarh, Distt. Churu, Rajasthan 331301,
Roll No. 2406001439.
10. Krishan Kumar Son Of Jai Chand, Aged About 27 Years,
Resident Of Village Jaitpur, Post- Kuharwas, Tehsil
Buhana, Distt. Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan 333034, Roll No.
2405006091.
11. Kamal Singh Gurjar Son Of Ram Phool Gurjar, Aged About
28 Years, Resident Of Shyaluta, Tehsil Rajgarh, Distt.
Alwar, Rajasthan 301410.
12. Sanjay Kumar Son Of Hoshiyar Singh, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of Village Nanwas, Post- Kuharwas, Tehsil
Buhana, Distt. Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan 333034, Roll No.
2405551811
13. Bheekam Singh Son Of Ratti Ram, Aged About 29 Years,
Resident Of Village Naya Gaon Kalan, Tehsil Bayana, Distt.
Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321408, Roll No. 2402519942
14. Mahendra Kumar Godara Son Of Ramawtar Godara, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Gudha Khurd, Post-
Palsana, Tehsil Sikar, Distt. Sikar, Rajasthan 332402, Roll
No. 2405024450

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (33 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

15. Jitendra Son Of Vijay Singh, Aged About 29 Years, Village
Dhosi, Tehsil Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu, Rajastha 332746,
Roll No. 2405520808.
16. Niranjan Son Of Jayachand, Aged About 26 Years,
Resident Of Village Bewar, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu,
Rajasthan 331301.roll No. 2404002329
17. Sandeep Kumar Son Of Mani Ram, Aged About 26 Years,
Resident Of Village Kaman, Post- Khairubari, Tehsil
Rajgarh, Distt. Churu, Rajasthan 331301. Roll No.
2406518594
18. Banbari Lal Son Of Prem Singh, Aged About 27 Years,
Resident Of Village Gajnua, Post- Samari, Tehsil Bayana,
Distt. Bharatpur,rajasthan 321405. Roll No. 2407504252.
19. Yogesh Kumar Meena Son Of Bansi Lal Meena, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Goramgarh, Vpo- Kuradiya,
Tehsil- Jahazpur, Distt. Bhilwara, Rajasthan 311201, Roll
No. 2401501218
20. Vikram Singh Son Of Mahendra Singh, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Rawal Rawato Ka Mohalla,
Doomar,ajmer,rajasthan 305206, Roll No. 2401516503.
21. Mahendra Singh Awana Son Of Hukam Singh, Aged About
28 Years, Resident Of Village Nimali, Post- Kolwa, Tehsil
Dausa,rajasthan 303325, Roll No. 2401001810
22. Tara Singh Gurjar Son Of Jagdish Prasad Gurjar, Aged
About 27 Years, Resident Of Koleshwar Kalen, Post-
Titwar, Dausa, Rajasthan 303325, Roll No. 2405528363
23. Digamvar Singh Son Of Shri Kaptan Singh, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of Vilage Sajjawas, Post- Dhana Kheri,
Tehsil Rupbas, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321403, Roll
No. 2406519579
24. Sonvir Singh Son Of Amar Singh, Aged About 27 Years,
Resident Of Village Pattipur, Post- Ekta, Tehsil Basedi,
Distt. Dholpur, Rajasthan, Roll No. 2407501665.
25. Ajeeram Gurjar Son Of Dharam Singh Gurjar, Aged About
28 Years, Resident Of Kutuki, Post- Shyaluta, Tehsil
Rajgarh, Distt. Alwar, Rajasthan 301410, Roll No.
2405005509.
26. Sumer Singh Son Of Nahar Singh, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Village Kumas, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan 333041,

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (34 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Roll No. 2404000989
27. Mukesh Kumar Son Of Kishor Singh, Aged About 30
Years, Resident Of Village Derawala, Jhunjhunu,rajasthan.
Roll No. 2401514606
28. Phool Chand Rewad Son Of Pokhar Ram, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Hapas, Post- Patoda, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Distt. Sikar, Rajasthan. Roll No.
2406001539
29. Hardesh Singh Kushwaha Son Of Anand Singh Kushwaha,
Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Bapu Nagar, Bhilwara,
Rajasthan 311001, Roll No. 2401502782.
30. Vikas Kumar Son Of Babulal, Aged About 29 Years,
Resident Ofvillage Nayabas, Tehsil Neem Kathana,
Distt.sikar, Rajasthan332713.
31. Sayar Singh Son Of Ramprasad, Aged About 29 Years,
Resident Of Village Nayabas, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Distt.
Sikar, Rajasthan 332713, Roll No. 2405562637.
32. Shakti Singh Son Of Dalpat Singh, Aged About 29 Years,
Resident Of Village Holpur Kalla, Post- Hariyara, Tehsil-
Bilara, Distt. Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342605. Roll No.
2406001730.
33. Hansraj Gurjar Son Of Shri Ramavtar Gurjar, Aged About
26 Years, Resident Of Village Kuhada, Tehsil Virat Nagar,
District Jaipur,rajasthan.roll No. 2405520546
34. Hansraj Meena Son Of Amarpa Meena, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Somnath Nagar, Bharnjari Mod, Dausa,
Rajasthan-303303, Roll No. 2405015466.
35. Mukesh Kumar Choudhary Son Of Jagdish Lal, Aged About
32 Years, Resident Of Village Kantichandrapura, Post-
Beejwad, Tehsil Dewli, District Tonk, Rajasthan
304507,roll No. 2401508747.
36. Onkar Ram Jat Son Of Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Rikshabas, Post- Dhankoli,
Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan 341516, Roll
No. 2406004304.
37. Raj Kishan Son Of Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Dabarwas, Tehsil Neemrana,
District Alwar, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2402509009.
38. Vinod Kumar Son Of Abhay Singh Yadav, Aged About 25

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (35 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Years, Resident Of Village Nanagwas, Tehsil-Neemrana,
District- Alwar, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2402508345.
39. Vikas Singh Son Of Jagdeesh Yadav, Aged About 29 Years,
Resident Of Village Nanagwas, Tehsil-Neemrana, District-
Alwar, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2406506680.
40. Gyarsi Lal Son Of Phool Chand Gurjar, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of Dhani Palwali, Post- Bhagega, Tehsil-
Neemkathana, District-Sikar, Rajasthan. Roll
No.2405560115.
41. Balvir Singh Son Of Noparam, Aged About 32 Years,
Resident Of Village Post- Netarwas, Tehsil-Dhod, District-
Sikar, Rajasthan.roll No. 2405500271.
42. Suresh Kumar Dhaka Son Of Gopal Singh, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Village Post- Netarwas, Tehsil-Dhod,
District- Sikar, Rajasthan.
43. Ramawatar Samota Son Of Dhura Ram, Aged About 25
Years, Resident Of Village- Loharwara, Tehsil-Khandela,
District- Sikar, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2405559832
44. Rang Lal Son Of Bhajan Lal, Aged About 31 Years,
Resident Of Dhani Septan Ki, Post- Bhadwari, Tehsil-
Khandela, District- Sikar, Rajasthan.roll No. 2405545211.
45. Girdhari Lal Yogi Son Of Shaitan Yogi, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Village Shuklawas, Tehsil- Kotputli,
District- Jaipur, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2405005894.
46. Surendra Singh Son Of Radheshyam Singh, Aged About
26 Years, Resident Of Vpo- Panchudlala Chid Via Rajnota,
Tehsil- Kotputli, District- Jaipur, Rajasthan.roll No.
2201004828.
47. Harendra Singh Shekhawat Son Of Arjun Singh
Shekhawat, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Vpo-
Karoli, Tehsil- Kotputli, District- Jaipur, Rajasthan.roll No.
2402005090.
48. Sheesh Ram Saini Son Of Mula Ram Saini, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Village- Jatala, Post- Monda, Tehsil-
Neem Ka Thana, District- Sikar, Rajasthan.roll No.
2407500761.
49. Baldev Ram Saini Son Of Dana Ram Saini, Aged About 31
Years, Resident Of Village- Jatala, Post- Monda, Tehsil-
Neem Ka Thana, District- Sikar, Rajasthan. Roll No.

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (36 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

2405560943.
50. Mukesh Kumar Kuri Son Of Jagana Ram Kuri, Aged About
29 Years, Resident Of Dhani Dudhyan Via Guhala, Post-
Narsinghpuri, Tehsil- Neem Ka Thana, Disrict- Sikar,
Rajasthan.roll No.- 2405563862.
51. Hansraj Meena Son Of Kishan Lal Meena, Aged About 30
Years, Resident Of Village Burja-Khirat Ka Bas, Post-
Golakabas, Tehsil- Rajgarh, District- Alwar, Rajasthan. Roll
No. 2405029166
52. Satya Narayan Meena Son Of Ramphool, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Village- Rambas, Post- Titarwara
Kalan, Dausa, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2405006672.
53. Tulsi Ram Meena Son Of Kishan Ram Meena, Aged About
27 Years, Resident Of Village- Kherli Pichnot, Post-
Khareda, Tehsil-Malakhar, District- Alwar, Rajasthan. Roll
No. 2402512329.
54. Jansi Ram Meena Son Of Mahadev Prasad Meena, Aged
About 31 Years, Resident Of Village Kyara, Post-
Suratgarh, Tehsil- Thanagazi, District- Alwar, Rajasthan.
Roll No. 2400519042.
55. Bhagirath Mal Saini Son Of Kishan Lal Saini, Aged About
25 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 12, Kampura, Narsingh
Puri, Tehsil- Neem Ka Thana, District- Sikar, Rajasthan.
Roll No. 2401515888
56. Surendra Kumar Son Of Baldev Singh, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of Mitharwalo Ki Dhani, Post- Khirod,
Tehsil- Nawalgarh, District- Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Roll
No. 2405006755
57. Rajkumar Naga Son Of Danaram Naga, Aged About 31
Years, Resident Of Village Naga Ki Dhani (Kanwarpura),
Tehsil- Dhod, District- Sikar, Rajasthan. Roll No.
2405518635
58. Narendra Kumarson Of Mahabeer Prasad Kumhar, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Dhani Kumaharan, Tehsil-
Taranagar, District- Churu, Rajasthan. Roll No.
2404003020.
59. Abid Khan Son Of Ramjyan Sara, Aged About 27 Years,
Resident Of Village Rajpura, Tehsil- Taranagar, District-
Churu, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2404512306.

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (37 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

60. Vikram Kumar Son Of Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Village Gunathu, Tehsil- Dhod, District-
Sikar, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2405507207
61. Anil Kumar Son Of Banwaree Lal, Aged About 27 Years,
Resident Of Village Dudhwamitha, Post- Rampurabass,
Tehsil And District- Churu, Rajasthan. Roll No.
2406513637.
62. Anil Kumar Son Of Shri Ram, Aged About 29 Years,
Resident Of Village Mandasi, Tehsil- Navalgarh, District-
Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2404000414.
63. Ishwar Son Of Om Prakash, Aged About 25 Years,
Resident Of Vilage Ojatu, Tehsil- Chirawa, District-
Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2409000186.
64. Pradeep Kumar Son Of Kailash Chand, Resident Of Village
Dabarwas, Tehsil Neemrana, District Alwar, Rajasthan-
301704. Roll No. 2402509078.
65. Om Prakash Son Of Ved Prakash, Resident Of Vpo-
Ghiloth, Tehsil Neemrana, District Alwar, Rajasthan-
301705. Roll No. 2402509734.
66. Ajeet Kumar Yogi Son Of Rajendra Prasad, Resident Of
Vpo- Ghiloth, Tehsil Neemrana, District Alwar, Rajasthan-
301705. Roll No. 2201512034.
67. Purn Singh Son Of Rajendra Singh, Resident Of Vpo-
Ghiloth, Tehsil Neemrana, District Alwar, Rajasthan-
301705. Roll No. 2402510570.
68. Nujesh Kumar Son Of Mani Ram, Resident Of Village
Shyampura, Post Kishorpura, Tehsil Chirawa, District
Jhunjhunu- 333028. Roll No. 2408002835
69. Deepa Ram Son Of Ram Kumar Bhakar, Resident Of Vpo
Nuwa, Vaya Beri Choti, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagour
(Raj.)-341551. Roll No. 2406500228.
70. Hemraj Prajapat Son Of Kailash Prajapat, Resident Of Vpo
Bhonawas, Tehsil Kotputli, Jaipur-303106. Roll No.
2201001016.
71. Dhanesh Kumar Son Of Madha Ram, Resident Of Village
Dhabro Ki Dhani, Gudha Gorji, Post Gudha Gorji, Tehsil
Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan-333022. Roll
No. 2405013657
72. Anil Kumar Son Of Hari Ram, Resident Of Village Dhabro

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (38 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Ki Dhani, Gudha Gorji, Post Gudha Gorji, Tehsil
Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan-333022. Roll
No. 2405007604
73. Suresh Kumar Son Of Joraram, Resident Of Village Ola Ki
Dhani, Post Chhawshri Via Titanwar, District Jhunjhunu,
Rajasthan-333012. Roll No. 2405503836
74. Rajesh Kumar Son Of Mahaveer Prasad Kharinta, Resident
Of Village Sonthali, Post Titanwar, District Jhunjhunu,
Rajasthan-333012. Roll No. 2401502365
75. Krishan Kumar Son Of Om Prakash, Residentof Vpo-
Dhosi, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Roll
No. 2405544999
76. Meer Singh Son Of Bhoop Singh, Resident Of Vpo Dhosi,
Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Roll No.
2405520810
77. Sunita Kumari Wife Of Harphool Meena, Resident Of Ward
No., 6, Mohalla Meeno Ka, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana,
Bhoodoli, Sikar, Rajasthan-332713. Rolll No. 2405033131
78. Sandeep Kumar Son Of Kalu Ram, Resident Of Village
Gadhwalo Ki Dhani, Post Chhawashri, Via Tatanwar,
District Jhunjhunu-333012. Roll No. 2401509774
79. Vinod Kumar Son Of Prabhat Ram, Resident Of Village
Railya Ki Dhani, Post Duriya, Via Gudha Gorji, District
Jhunjhunu-333022. Roll No. 2406501846
80. Mukesh Kumar Son Of Om Prakash Mahala, Resident Of
Mahala Ki Dhani, Post Titanwar, District Jhunjhunu-
333012. Roll No. 2405514931
81. Sanjay Singh Son Of Suraj Mal, Resident Of Village
Kanchanpur, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar Rajasthan.
Roll No. 2405522635
82. Vikash Kumar Son Of Harlal Singh, Resident Of Village
And Post Dhani Majhav, Viaa Jakhal, Tehsil Udaipurwati,
District Jhunjhunu-333305. Roll No. 2201513261
83. Shankar Lal Son Of Nwahar Singh, Resident Of Village
Duriyan, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu-333022.
Roll No. 2401002013
84. Sishram Muval Son Of Jawahar Lal Muval, Resident Of
Dulthana, Post Pujari Ka Bas, Tehsil Khandela, District
Sikar, Rajasthan-332722. Roll No. 2201515172.

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (39 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

85. Mool Chand Kharinta Son Of Harlal Singh, Resident Of
Village Sounthali, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
Roll No. 2401501033
86. Shiv Charan Rao Son Of Om Prakash Rao, Resident Of
Village Siroj, Tehsil Kishangarh, District Ajmer. Roll No.
2402517309.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretariat New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No. 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5696/2019
1. Mamta Kajla D/o Shri Suraj Mal Kajla, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of Village Lamiya, Via- Khatushayam,
Tehsil Dataramgrah, District Sikar (Rajasthan) Roll No.
24050235753
2. Keshar Ram S/o Shri Hanuman Ram, Aged About 31
Years, Resident Of Village And Post -Araksar Tehsil Nawa,
District Nagour (Rajasthan) Roll No. 2405026018.
3. Mahesh Kumar S/o Shri Khayali Ram Gurjar, Aged About
27 Years, Resident Of Siradhana Ki Post Harjanpura, Via
Kanwat, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana District Sikar (Rajasthan)
Roll No. 2405544254
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretarate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5702/2019
Prakash Chand Yadav S/o Shri Ram Chandra Yadav, Aged About
30 Years, Resident Of Dhani Borawali, Sati Mod Narsingh Puri

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (40 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Rajasthan) Roll No.
2401513642
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No. 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi
India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7347/2019
Vinod Kumar Meena S/o Shri Gopal Lal Meena, Aged About 26
Years, R/o - Post Dadiya Rampura, Shri Madhopur, Sikar,
Rajasthan Roll No. 2405027035
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No. 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
1100003 India.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7393/2019
1. Vijapal Singh S/o Shivpa Singh, Aged About 27 Years,
Resident Of Ward No. 7, Patwari Ka Bas, Tehsil
Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. Roll No.
2405006833
2. Kamal Singh S/o Kaluram, Aged About 32 Years, Resident
Of Village- Bhawanpura, Tehsil- Rupawas, District
Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2405520434
3. Gaje Singh Yadav S/o Ram Karan, Aged About 31 Years,
Resident Of Bal Kishan Ki Dhani, Post- Tatarpur, Tehsil-
Mundawar, District- Alwar, Rajasthan. Roll No.
2402504069
4. Rajendra Singh Yadav S/o Suraj Bhan Yadav, Aged About
31 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 26, Kalyanpura, Tehsil-
Bansur, District- Alwar, Rajasthan. Roll No.2404511634

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (41 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

5. Sahid Khan S/o Rasid Khan, Aged About 31 Years,
Resident Of Bayana Gate Weir, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Roll
No.2402506224
6. Chandra Prakash Meena S/o Gyarsi Lal Meena, Aged
About 32 Years, Resident Of Vpo- Mahangi, Tehsi- Jamva
Ramgarh, District- Jaipur, Rajasthan. Roll No.2405534407
7. Naresh Kumar S/o Bhogi Ram, Aged About 27 Years,
Resident Of Village- Nibhera, Tehsil- Roopwas, District-
Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Roll No.
8. Ranbeer Singh S/o Girdhar Singh, Aged About 32 Years,
Resident Of Village Gurjar Balai, Post- Kheda Thakur,
Tehsil- Roopwas, District- Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Roll No.
2405030530
9. Hanuman Shai Meena S/o Ramji Lal Meena, Resident Of
Village Birkadi, Post- Ajabgarh, Tehsil- Thanagaji, District-
Alwar, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2409500917
10. Aslam Ali S/o Mohd. Iqbal, Resident Of Hamir Khan Ka
Bass, Post- Jabasar, Tehsil- Malsisar, District-Jhunjhunu,
Rajasthan. Roll No.2405536710
11. Bijender S/o Sahi Ram, Resident Of Village- Nangliya,
Post- Dudhwa, Tehsil- Khetri, District- Jhunjhunu,
Rajasthan. Roll No.
12. Bhawani Singh Meena S/o Ramniwas Meena, Aged About
31 Years, Resident Of Village- Thoi, Tehsil- Srimadhopur,
District- Sikar, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2405500737
13. Ramesh Chand Gurjar S/o Bhagirath, Aged About 30
Years, Resident Of Village- Pahari, Tehsil- Behror, District-
Alwar, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2402516940
14. Ashok Kumar S/o Lami Narayan, Resident Of Village-
Pahari, Tehsil- Behror, District- Alwar, Rajasthan. Roll No.
2402510626
15. Ashok Kumar S/o Ramji Lal, Aged About 30 Years,
Resident Of Jorawar Nagar Via Kanwat, Tehsil-
Srimadhopur, District- Sikar, Rajasthan. Roll No.
2405501304.
16. Rakesh Kumar S/o Dayaram, Aged About 27 Years,
Resident Of Village Jejusar, Tehsil- Nawalgarh, District-
Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Roll No. 2405017809.
17. Sajjan Kumar S/o Girdhari Lal, Aged About 27 Years,

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (42 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Resident Of Ward No.11, Doomra, Tehsil Nawalgarh,
District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthna. Roll No. 2404000609.
18. Govind Singh Baghel S/o Ramesh Chand Baghel, Aged
About 27 Years, Resident Of New Sgergad, Purana Sahar,
Dholpur (Raj.). Roll No. 2405542375
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretariat New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No. 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
100003 India.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8326/2019
Ram Kishan Sharma S/o Shri Gogaram Sharma, R/o- Village Post
Lamba Rulan, Tehsil Todaraisingh, District Tonk (Raj.) Roll No.
2405527282
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi India
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region Block No 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi -
1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10060/2019
1. Mukesh Kumar Dhinwa S/o Shri Bansi Dhar Dhinwa, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Todapur, Tehsil Nawalgarh,
District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, Roll No. 2405009589.
2. Rajesh Kumar Gurjar S/o Shri Sadhu Ram, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village- Dolaj, Post- Tevri, Tehsil- Virat
Nagar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan, Roll No. 2405031581.
3. Sardar Mal Jat S/o Harsahay Jat, Aged About 25 Years,
Resident Of Ward No. 04, Katariya Krishi Farm, Tehsil-
Sahapura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan, Roll No.
2405023590.
4. Mukesh Kumar Yadav S/o Girdhari Lal Yadav, Resident Of

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (43 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Vpo Khatkad, Tehsil-Srimadhopur, District Sikar,
Rajasthan,roll No. 2405553497.
5. Mohan Lal Yadav S/o Mahadev Prasad Yadav, Aged About
27 Years, Resident Of Dhani Tejajiwali, Village Sherpura,
Post- Khori, Tehsil- Sahapura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan,
Roll No. 2405559469.
6. Amit Kumar Bohra S/o Nathu Ram Bohra, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Chirana, Tehsil- Nawalgarh, District
Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, Roll No. 2405543800.
7. Rajanish Meena S/o Prakash Kumar Meena, Aged About
29 Years, Resident Of Vpo Kushalpura, Via Piprali, District
Sikar, Rajasthan, Roll No. 2405015691.
8. Sayar Mal Yadav S/o Balu Ram Yadav, Aged About 32
Years, Resident Of Vpo Divrala, Tehsil- Srimadhopur,
District Sikar, Rajasthan, Roll No. 2405001030.
9. Rajesh Kumar Meena S/o Bhagwan Ram Meena, Aged
About 27 Years, Permanent Resident Of Village-Todpura,
Post- Chirana, Tehsil- Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu,
Presently Resideing Ward No. 2, Village Post- Ratan
Nagar, Churu, Rajasthan, Roll No. 2405552039.
10. Rajendra Kumar Yadav S/o Gopal Yadav, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Dhani Sirsawali, Vpo Divrala, Tehsil-
Srimadhopur, District- Sikar, Rajasthan, Roll No.
2405010505.
11. Sunda Ram Saini S/o Hardeva Ram Saini, Aged About 30
Years, Resident Of Khetu Mali Ki Dhani, Village- Bajor,
District- Sikar, Rajasthan, Roll No. 2405556163.
12. Har Phool Singh S/o Ram Chandra Singh, Aged About 25
Years, Resident Of Post- Gokulpura, Tehsil And District
Sikar, Rajasthan, Roll No. 2405501418.
13. Hari Singh Meena S/o Laxman Prasad Meena, Aged About
32 Years, Resident Of Near Power House, Manpura,
District Dausa, Rajasthan, Roll No. 3001045018.
14. Mukesh Kumar S/o Arjun Lal, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Village Bawaliy, Post- Neemera, District Sikar,
Rajasthan, Roll No. 2405030459.
15. Dinesh Kumar S/o Chote Lal, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Village Khamchand Ki Dhani, Post- Dhamora,
Tehsil- Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, Roll

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (44 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

No. 2405015974.
16. Jitendra Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Rekha Ram, Aged About
28 Years, Resident Of Dhani Bilbawali, Village Anatpura,
Post Diwrala Via Ajitgarh, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District
Sikar, Rajasthan, Roll No. 2405000820.
17. Mamraj Yadav S/o Kalu Ram, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Village Post Gothara, Tehsil- Nawalgarh,
District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, Roll No. 2405539978.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home Department
Government Of India Secretariat New Delhi India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No. 12 Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-
100003 India.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10767/2019
1. Kailash Chand Meena S/o Shri Kajor Mal Meena, Aged
About 31 Years, Resident Of Village Padak Chhapli, Post
Pratapgarh, Tehsil Thanagazi District Alwar, Rajasthan.
2. Om Prakash Meena S/o Shri Shankar Lal Meena, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Bhinvpura Post
Bagwada, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3. Dashrath Meena S/o Shri Babu Lal Meena, Resident Of
Village Heesla, Post Saleta,tehsil Thanagazi District Alwar,
Rajasthan.
4. Ram Lal Meena S/o Gopi Ram Meena, Aged About 31
Years, Resident Of Bhinvpura, (Bodeya Ki Dhani), Post
Bagwada, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan
5. Chhote Lal Meena S/o Shri Jagdish Meena, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Angari, Post Nangalbani Tehsil
Thanagazi District Alwar, Rajasthan.
6. Richpal Singh Rajput S/o Shri Sardar Singh Rajput, Aged
About 27 Years, Resident Of Vpo Bishanpura, Bia
Sainthal, Tehsil And District Dausa, Rajasthan.
7. Mukesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Pokhar Mal Meena, Aged
About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Bhinvpura, Post
Bagwada, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (45 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

8. Mahaveer Prasad Meena S/o Shri Ram Karan Meena, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Angari, Post
Nangalwani, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Home Dpartment,
Government Of India, Secretariat, New Delhi
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region, Block No. 12 Cgo Complex, Lodhi Road, New
Delhi- 1100003 India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14354/2019
1. Mahendra Kumar Gurjar S/o Shri Prahalad Gurjar, Aged
About 27 Years, Resident Of Pathreri, Tehsil Kotputli,
District Jaipur, Rajasthan. (Roll No. Ssc (Gd)- 2011-
2402001364)
2. Kalu Ram Gurjar S/o Shri Bhairoo Sahai Gurjar, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Village Pachpadi, Post
Pratapgarh, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.) (Roll
No. Ssc (Gd) 2011-2405543296)
3. Danveer Singh S/o Shri Ratan Singh, Resident Of Village
Tayopura, Post Kumha, Tehsil And District Bharatpur,
(Raj.) (Roll No. Ssc (Gd) 2011-2405561309)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Home
Department, Government Of India, Secretariat, New
Delhi.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission Northern
Region, Block No. 12 Cgo Complex, Lodhi Road, New
Delhi India
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14361/2019
1. Ashok Kumar Gurjar S/o Shri Dhuna Ram Gurjar, Aged
About 25 Years, Resident Of V.p.o. Mandha, Dhani-
Chobala-Ki, Via Rajnota, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur
(Raj.) (Roll. No. Ssc (Gd)-2011 2405014268)

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (46 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

2. Chhajoo Ram S/o Shri Ganga Ram Gurjar, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of Village Padak Chhapli, Post Pratapgarh,
Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.) (Roll No. Ssc
(Gd)2011 2402005771)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Home
Department, Government Of India, Secretariat, New
Delhi.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region, Block No. 12 Cgo Complex, Lodhi Road, New
Delhi-1100003 India.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1165/2020
1. Sanwar Mal Son Of Shri Sharwan Kumar, Aged About 31
Years, Resident Of Village Gordhanpura, Via Palsana,
Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
2. Balram Gadwal Son Of Shri Bhagwana Ram, Aged About
28 Years, Resident Of Dukiya, Via Palsana, Tehsil
Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
3. Mahendra Kumar Yadav Son Of Shri Hajari Lal Yadav,
Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Manda (Madani) Via
Palsana, Tehsil Dantramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Home
Department, Government Of India Secretrate New Delhi
India.
2. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Northern
Region Block No. 12, Cgo Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi.
1100003 (India)
----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.N. Mathur, Senior Counsel with
Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola, Adv.
Mr. Surya Pratap Singh for Mr. Deepak
Sharma, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.D. Rastogi, ASG with Mr. Ashish

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (47 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

Kumar, Mr. Anand Sharma, Mr.
Devesh Yadav, Mr. Shubhankit, Mr.
C.S. Sinha, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Judgment

Reserved On: 17/05/2023
Pronounced On: 25/08/2023

1. The common issue involved in all these writ petitions relates

to claim for appointment to the post of Constable (General Duty) in

pursuance to advertisement dated 05.02.2011. This is the second round

of litigation subsequent to representation on the issue, earlier directed,

having been dismissed. As common issue is involved in all these writ

petitions, with the consent of the parties, all the petitions were heard

together and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26389/2018 was taken as lead

file.

2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the rejection of their

representation vide order dated 22.02.2018 and non-consideration of

their candidature for appointment to the post of Constable (GD) in

pursuance to advertisement dated 05.02.2011, the present bunch of

writ petitions are filed seeking the following relief:
"(i) By issuing a writ of mandamus for Appointment of
petitioner on the post of Constable (GD) in CISF, BSF, CRPF,
SSB, Assam Rifles / ITBP against left out vacancy according to
other similarly situated persons on the basis of note / condition
no 3 & 4 of the permission letter mentioned as in para no 3 &
4 of the permission letter and the as per para 10 sub para iv of
impugned advertisement "the commission with the approval of
the Ministry of Home Affairs shall have the discretion to divert
candidates from surplus State to deficit State" with all
consequential benefit as per higher merit position or also
against vacant post available with the department same
vacant post should not be carry forward or fill up against the
vacancy of next against vacant post available with the
department same vacant post should not be carry forward or

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (48 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

fill up against the vacancy of next recruitment year as year
2015 or year 2017
(ii) and the impugned order dated 55/02/2018 (Annexure-18)
may kindly be declared arbitrary, unconstitutional and quashed
and set aside
(iii) the cost of the petition be awarded in favour of the
petitioners
(iv) Any other appropriate writ order of direction which this
Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the
petitioners."

BACKGROUND

3. In the earlier round of litigation, the petition seeking similar

relief was disposed of vide order dated 17.05.2017 by Co-ordinate

Bench of this Court in SBCWP No. 2867/2017 titled as 'Kashi Ram

vs. Union of India & Anr', and other connected matters, with the

following directions:

"(a) That all petitioners shall appear before Secretary, Staff
Selection Commission and they shall submit comprehensive
detailed representation giving details of the candidates who
being less meritorious have been appointed.
(b) That the petitioners in the representation to be filed shall
be at liberty to demolish the arguments raised by the
respondents that less meritorious persons because of
belonging to border area or of being more in age or for any
other reasons have been given appointment.
(c) The petitioners shall also be entitled to raise arguments
that wrongly candidates from the State of Rajasthan were
diverted to other States even they were less meritorious or
qua meritorious persons route of diversion to the other state
was not followed. Petitioners shall be also at liberty to
ventilate any other grievance they have regarding the
recruitment process undertaken by Regional Director, Staff
Selection Commission, Northern Region. The Secretary, Staff
Selection Commission, shall hold a fact finding inquiry into the
allegations leveled against the officials who at the relevant
time were posted in the Regional Directorate of Staff Selection
Commission, Northern Region.
(d) Secretary, Staff Selection Commission, before decision of
the representation shall publish a list of all candidates who
appeared in the State of Rajasthan for the recruitment to the
post of Constable (General Duty) in paramilitary forces in
pursuance to impugned advertisement qua all the categories
be it General, OBC, SC or ST. In the list so published marks

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (49 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

secured by each candidate shall be depicted along with cut off-
marks, of the category to which candidate belong.
(e) In the list, so published, in pursuance of above directions
the reasons shall be assigned as to why a particular candidate
has been appointed even though he has secured less marks.
(f) After publication of the list Secretary, Staff Selection
Commission shall afford hearing to the petitioners and shall
pass a detailed reasoned speaking order within one month
after the conclusion of the hearing.
The petitioners shall be at liberty to re-approach this
court, in case, they are aggrieved against the order to be
passed by the Secretary, Staff Selection Commission."

4. Pursuant to the aforesaid directions, the petitioner(s) filed a

representation, which was rejected vide impugned order dated

22.02.2018. Contempt petitions (S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.

1413/2017 and other similar petitions) filed against the rejection of

representation was also dismissed vide order dated 07.05.2018.

SUBMISSIONS OF PETITIONERS

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that vide

advertisement dated 05.02.2011, initially about 49,000 (forty nine

thousand) posts of Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, CRPF & SSB were

advertised, which were subsequently increased to about 72,000

(seventy two thousand) and then ultimately to about 90,000 (ninety

thousand) by including the posts of Constable (GD) in ITBP and Assam

Rifles. All the petitioners scored more than the cut off marks in the

written exam and were accordingly called for the physical/medical test.

However, when the final merit list was published, the name of the

petitioners was not reflected therein. Being aggrieved, different

petitioners filed different petitions which were all disposed of with

similar direction to file representations. Learned counsel for the

petitioners contends that all the representations were rejected

mechanically, without application of mind and with utter disregard to

the specific directions of this Court issued vide order dated 17.05.2017

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (50 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

and therefore all the impugned orders are liable to be quashed and set

aside and accordingly the petitioners be afforded appointment on the

vacant posts. In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the

petitioners has made the following submissions:

5.1) That the advertised posts were to fill the vacancies arising

all over India in the paramilitary forces. As per the advertisement dated

05.02.2011 and the admission certificate, the applicants could be

diverted from one State having surplus applicants to another State

having deficit candidates. The relevant para 10 (iv) of the

advertisement and note-3 of the admission certificate are reproduced as

under:

"10. Mode of selection:
(iv) The Commission, with the approval of the Ministry of
Home Affairs, shall have the discretion to divert candidates
from Surplus States to deficit States.
...
Note-3: Candidates would be required to exercise additional
options for posting in Assam Rifles/ITBP in order of
preference at option boxes given in the Attendance Sheet to
be provided in the examination hall. These two additional
options would be applicable only in case they are not
selected for Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, SSB & CRPF and
otherwise eligible"

Relying upon the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the recruitment process was for posts available throughout the country

and the new theory about the recruitment being state and category

wise, which the respondents have adopted at this belated stage, is

contrary to the terms of the advertisement.

5.2) That the recruitment process in pursuance to advertisement

dated 05.02.2011 is still ongoing and as many as 28,044 vacancies are

pending, which is evident from letter dated 15.03.2016 (Annexure-19)

issued by Deputy Director, Staff Selection Commission, Allahabad (UP).

Further, some applicants were given appointment as late as in 2019 and

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (51 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

therefore even at this stage, the writ petition with the prayed relief of

appointment has not become infructuous.

5.3) That the selection process was entirely arbitrary and pick

and choose policy was adopted by the respondents. Similarly situated

candidates and candidates lower in merit were given appointment both

in the State of Rajasthan and outside. In this regard, an illustrative list

of candidates was also provided containing the similarly situated

candidates/lower meritorious candidates who were purportedly given

appointment. Learned counsel also highlighted the case of one applicant

named 'Raju Singh' who belonged to Suratgarh, District

Shriganganagar, which is border area, and who scored more than the

cut-off marks for a candidate belonging to border area and yet his

candidature was rejected mechanically by treating him as a candidate

belonging to general area.

5.4) That the impugned order rejecting the representation is

based on false statements made by the respondents. The impugned

order is supposedly passed on the basis of "record available with

Commission", whereas no such record is available with the Commission

as per the respondent's own submission made before the Hon'ble

Supreme Court. In the case of Hari Om Singh vs. Union of India &

Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 130/2018; decided on 10.01.2018), the

respondents categorically submitted that since the advertisement was

of 2011, the record could not be found in 2018. The relevant part of the

order dated 10.01.2018 is reproduced as under:

"Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India has
fairly submitted that this is a 2011 case, and therefore the
record could not be found, but for this obviously the appellant
cannot be made to suffer. It is also submitted that the
appellant has now crossed the age bar. According to us neither
of these contentions can be countenanced. In view of the fact
that for an obvious mistake the appellant should not be
penalized, if otherwise eligible on merits. In view of the

(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)
[2023/RJJP/011482] (52 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

matter, we allow the appeal and set aside the judgment
passed by the High Court. The appellant will be absorbed in
the BSF forthwith."

By the respondent's own submission, the record of 2011 advertisement

was weeded out after the expiry of their record retention scheduled

period and the very fact that the respondents decided the

representation on the basis on non-existent record proves that the

representation was rejected mechanically.

5.5) That the directions issued by Co-ordinate Bench of this

Court vide order dated 17.05.2017 were not complied with in letter and

in spirit. The spirit of the Court's order was to ensure that there was no

discrimination vis-à-vis the other appointment to the post of Constable

(GD) with para military forces pursuant to the advertisement dated

05.02.2011. The non-speaking impugned order does not ensure that no

lower meritorious candidates have been appointed and this fact by itself

indicates that there has been bungling in the appointment to the post of

Constable (GD) pursuant to advertisement dated 05.02.2011. Further, a

fact finding inquiry was also directed to be conducted into allegations

levelled against the concerned officers at the time. However, no report

in this regard was ever produced.

SUBMISSIONS OF RESPONDENTS

6. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents has raised

preliminary objections on the maintainability of the present bunch of

writ petitions. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents

submits that this is the fifth round of litigation by these petitioners, who remained unsuccessful for no other reason than lack of merit. The representation of the petitioners was decided by way of a speaking order wherein all the contentions raised before this Court were duly answered, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM) [2023/RJJP/011482] (53 of 65) [CW-26389/2018] and it was clarified, in no uncertain terms, that no person below the cut-off was given appointment. Learned counsel for the respondent contends that there is no merit in any of the contentions raised by the petitioners herein, that the petitioners are compulsive litigants who are still agitating the recruitment in pursuance to the advertisement issued in the year 2011 even after four subsequent recruitment cycles have been concluded and therefore the present bunch of writ petitions should be dismissed at this threshold with heavy cost, especially considering that no vacant posts exists as on date.

7. On merits, learned counsel for the respondents made the following submissions:

7.1) That after the conclusion of the recruitment process in pursuance to the advertisement dated 05.02.2011, four subsequent rounds of recruitment, in the year 2012, 2013, 2015 and 2018, have also concluded and no vacancies exist as on date qua advertisement dated 05.02.2011 to accommodate the petitioners. 7.2) That in the advertisement itself it was clearly mentioned that vacancies, which were prescribed State wise and category wise, were tentative. The scheme of recruitment was prepared by the Ministry of Home Affairs (for short "MHA") and the Staff Selection Commission (hereinafter referred to as "the Commission") conducted the recruitment according to the said scheme. The mode of selection was always prescribed to be state and category wise. The minimum cut-off marks prescribed in para 10 of the advertisement dated 05.02.2011 was for the limited purpose of preparing list of those candidates who would qualify for the detailed medical examination (for short "DME") and the cut-off for final selection was fixed as per the stipulated criterion of merit-cum-post preference option given by the candidate and subject to State, District Area and category wise number of (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM) [2023/RJJP/011482] (54 of 65) [CW-26389/2018] vacancies reported by CAPFs. Initially the advertisement was only for recruitment in BSF, CISF, CRPF and SSB, but subsequently the applicants were also given an additional option to give their preference for posting in Assam Rifles or ITBP. But at the same time, it was clarified that the Commission only proposes to fill up the left over vacancy, if any, in Assam Rifles and ITBP after filling them from the two dedicated separate examination conducted simultaneously from the eligible and successful candidates of recruitment of Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, CRPF and SSB. However, since all the vacancies of Assam Rifles and ITBP were filled from their separate dedicated examination, there was no occasion to consider the candidature of the petitioners in Assam Rifles and ITBP.

7.3) That the Select List was prepared as per State-wise vacancies with further reservation for candidates of Border Districts/Naxal or Military affected districts within the State. Surplus candidates securing marks above the highest cut off marks fixed in the written examination for their respective categories were included in the Reserve List and considered for allocation against the unfilled vacancies in other states. However, MHA advised that unfilled vacancies in Jammu & Kashmir, North Eastern States (Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura), Naxal and Military affected States (Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Orissa, Jharkhand, Chattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal) should not be filled with candidates from surplus States/UTs. Therefore, such vacancies were not taken into consideration after preparation of Select List while allotting surplus candidates against vacancies in deficit States/UTs. The 28,044 vacancies that the petitioner alleges are also vacancies that fall within these States, which could not be filled by surplus candidates, including the present petitioners who apart from (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM) [2023/RJJP/011482] (55 of 65) [CW-26389/2018] being from the State of Rajasthan are also not high enough in merit to be included in the Reserve List. Details of marks of last selected candidates for the vacancies allotted to Rajasthan (State Code: 29) are given below:

Select List State State CAP Category SC ST OBC UR Ex.S Code Name & F Area 29 Rajasthan BSF 37 63 63 70 38 (General) 29 Rajasthan BSF 45 33 33 47 48 (Border) 29 Rajasthan CISF 63 76 76 79 36 (General) 29 Rajasthan CISF - - - - -

(Border) 29 Rajasthan CRPF 49 69 70 71 35 (General) 29 Rajasthan SSB 33 62 66 68 42 (General) Reserve List (prepared on All India Basis):

   CPO               SC             ST                OBC               UR             Ex-S
BSF (A)       42               60               60                 65             56
CISF (B)      55               74               72                 76             53
CRPF (C)      42               65               61                 67             -
SSB (D)       33               59               58                 62             -


7.4)          That taking the case of the petitioner Sita Ram for instance,

who being an OBC candidate belonging to General District Area of State of Rajasthan (code-29) had scored 45 marks in the written examination, which were less than the marks of last selected candidate of same State, same District Area and same category in the Select List prepared State wise as well as in the Reserve List prepared on all India basis.

Therefore, he was not selected in the Constable (GD) Examination 2011 (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM) [2023/RJJP/011482] (56 of 65) [CW-26389/2018] due to his low merit in both Select List and Reserve List. Similarly, the Commission never declared any person selected in the Select List or the Reserve List below the cut-off marks as detailed in result write-up dated 28.11.2011.

7.5) That it is further clarified that as the vacancies were State wise for the Select List, hence it is not justified for any two candidates of said recruitment examination for the same year to compare their selection status with respect to each other if both of them do not belong to the same State, same district area and same category in Select List and do not belong to same category in case of Reserve List, which was prepared on all India basis. The comparison of selection status by candidate of different States, different district areas and different category is not justified.

7.6) That it is also wrong to say that the representation was decided without availability of record. The reason for availability of basic data despite the fact that physical record pertaining to this examination, i.e. dossier of non-selected candidates being weeded out, is that the copy of application containing basic data filled by the candidate in his/her application submitted in the exam is still available in electronic form with data processing agency of the Commission. Further, the result of this exam is also available on the website of the Commission. Hence all required date is available in electronic form. 7.7) That even if some mistake is committed and someone who is not meritorious is erroneously accorded appointment, the appropriate step would be to remove such candidate, rather than perpetuating such illegality. It is a settled position of law that illegality cannot be perpetuated. Reliance in this regard can be placed on Apex Court judgments of Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur vs. Daulat Mal Jain and Ors.: (1997) 1 SCC 35, Basawaraj and Ors. (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM) [2023/RJJP/011482] (57 of 65) [CW-26389/2018] vs. The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer: (2013) 14 SCC 81, Fuljit Kaur vs. State of Punjab: (2010) 11 SCC 455, and Sneh Prabha vs. State of UP: (1996) 7 SCC 426.

7.8) That the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court had the occasion to consider similar controversy pertaining to the same advertisement dated 05.02.2011 in the case of Ajit Singh and Ors. vs. Union of India and Ors. (Writ A. No. 48354 of 2017; decided on:

20.08.2018) and the Court ruled in favour of Union of India. The said judgment has been upheld by both the Division Bench of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in Vinay Kumar Singh and Ors. vs. Union of India and Ors. (Special Appeal Defective No. 962 of 2018;

decided on: 12.10.2020) as well as by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kuldeep Kumar & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 2861/2021; decided on 26.11.2021). 7.9) That as per settled position of law, mere inclusion in the select list does not confer any absolute right upon the petitioner for being appointed. Reliance in this regard is placed on Apex Court judgment of Ashwani Kumar Singh vs. UPPSC: (2003) 11 SCC

584. 7.10) That had the petitioners provided substantial documents in support of their candidature and selection, such as scoring more marks in the written examination than the marks secured by the last selected candidate in the same category, same district area and same State in Select List or marks secured by the last selected candidate in same category in Reserve List of the said examination, their case would have been considered for revision of their result and their representation would not have been rejected. But since all the petitioners are clearly not selected on account of their low merit, the writ petition should be (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM) [2023/RJJP/011482] (58 of 65) [CW-26389/2018] dismissed with exemplary cost to avoid unwarranted and unending litigation.

ANALYSIS

8. Heard the arguments advanced by both the sides, scanned the record of the writ petition and considered the judgments cited at Bar.

9. The primary issue raised by the petitioners is that since the advertisement dated 05.02.2011 was floated for recruitment on the post of Constable (GD) all over the country in different paramilitary forces, including that of Assam Rifles and ITBP, and since similarly situated persons have been given appointment, the petitioners may also be given appointment as there are still about 28,044 vacancies which are pending as on date.

10. Before proceedings to the merits of the case, it is necessary to elucidate the mode and manner of selection in pursuance to advertisement dated 05.02.2011. The Commission published advertisement for three recruitment exams simultaneously in the Employment News/Rozgar Samachar on 05.02.2011:

a.) Recruitment of Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, CRPF, and SSB Examination 2011;

b.) Recruitment of Constable (GD) in ITBP, Examination 2011; c.) Recruitment of Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifle Examination 2011.

The candidates applying for post of Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, CRPF, and SSB were cautioned that they were required to submit their application in the prescribed format to the concerned Regional office of Commission under whose jurisdiction the Center selected by him/her for written examination falls. The candidates applying for the post of Constable (GD) in ITBP were required to submit their application form (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM) [2023/RJJP/011482] (59 of 65) [CW-26389/2018] to North West Regional Office of the Commission at Chandigarh and candidates applying for the post of Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles were required to submit their application form to North East Regional Office of the Commission at Guwahati. What is pertinent to note is that the examination of all the aforementioned three recruitment process were separate. During the written examination for Constable (GD) in BSF (Code A), CISF (Code B), CRPF (Code C), and SSB (Code D), candidates were given an option to submit their preference for ITBP (Code E) and Assam Rifles (Code F) also. However, it was clarified that the Commission only proposes to fill up the left up vacancies, if any, after the declaration of results of the separate examination of ITBP and Assam Rifles. The result of Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifle Examination 2011 was declared on 30.05.2011 and 3915 candidates were called for the DME against the 2076 vacancies. The result of Constable (GD) in ITBP, Examination 2011 was declared on 02.06.2011 and 17707 candidates were called for DME against the 16467 vacancies. Since no vacancies remained after declaration of the results of Assam Rifle Examination 2011 and ITBP, Examination 2011, there was no occasion to consider the candidature of petitioners, let alone anyone else who only applied for Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, CRPF, and SSB Examination 2011, for appointment in Assam Rifles or ITBP. It has specifically been pleaded that no candidate of Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, CRPF & SSB Examination 2011 was selected in ITBP / Assam Rifles.

11. It appears that the petitioners have proceeded with the misconceived notion that the recruitment to Assam Rifles and ITBP were to be made exclusively from the results of Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, CRPF, and SSB Examination 2011. However, since such a notion is factually incorrect, no relief to that extent can be granted to the (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM) [2023/RJJP/011482] (60 of 65) [CW-26389/2018] petitioners, even if they were declared successful in the Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, CRPF, and SSB Examination 2011. Therefore, the prayer of the petitioners to be considered against the posts of Assam Rifles and ITBP, being completely devoid of merits, was rightly rejected vide the impugned order dated 22.02.2018.

12. Since the issue related to Assam Rifles and ITBP is settled, the next issue which requires the consideration of this Court is with respect to preparation of Select List and Reserve List for the Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, CRPF, and SSB Examination 2011 and the issue of diversion of candidates from surplus State to deficit State. The written exam for Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, CRPF, and SSB Examination 2011 was held on 05.06.2011. As per para 10 of the advertisement, relied upon by the petitioners, the minimum cut-off percentage of marks was prescribed only for the limited purpose of qualification of the candidate for appearance in DME and not for the final selection, as contended by the petitioners. The result of the Constable (GD) in BSF, CISF, CRPF, and SSB Examination 2011 was declared on 28.11.2011 for those male candidate who were declared 'Fit' in DME. The write-up/result dated 28.11.2011 contained methodology of the selection, details of marks of last selected candidates- State/UT wise, CAPF-wise, category wise, area wise etc. Details of marks of last selected candidate for the vacancies allotted to Station code 29 (Rajasthan), under the jurisdiction of Northern Regional Office of the Commission at Delhi were also provided. The Select List was accordingly prepared as per State wise vacancies with further reservations for Border / Naxal or military affected areas. The Reserve List was prepared on all India basis and the cut-off marks for inclusion in the Reserve List was based on the marks obtained by the last selected candidate in that particular category. The category wise cut-off marks of the Select List and the Reserve List has been (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM) [2023/RJJP/011482] (61 of 65) [CW-26389/2018] reproduced above, but for the sake of convenience, the same is reproduced again:

Select List State State CAP Category SC ST OBC UR Ex.S Code Name & F Area

29 Rajasthan BSF 37 63 63 70 38 (General) 29 Rajasthan BSF 45 33 33 47 48 (Border) 29 Rajasthan CISF 63 76 76 79 36 (General) 29 Rajasthan CISF - - - - -

(Border) 29 Rajasthan CRPF 49 69 70 71 35 (General) 29 Rajasthan SSB 33 62 66 68 42 (General) Reserve List (prepared on All India Basis):

   CPO               SC             ST                OBC               UR             Ex-S
BSF (A)       42               60               60                 65             56
CISF (B)      55               74               72                 76             53
CRPF (C)      42               65               61                 67             -
SSB (D)       33               59               58                 62             -

The result/write-up dated 28.11.2011 and the cut-off marks of last selected candidate has not been challenged. The consistent stand of the Commission has been that no person below the cut-off has been selected in either of the lists and if any candidate has been wrongly appointed, then such cases of aberrations have been duly scrutinized and cancelled. It is noted that the petitioner Sita Ram, being an OBC candidate from General Area of State of Rajasthan, had scored only 45 marks in the written examination as against the cut-off of 58 marks for inclusion in the Reserve List. Therefore, being low in merit, the (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM) [2023/RJJP/011482] (62 of 65) [CW-26389/2018] candidature of the petitioner was rightly rejected by the Commission. It appears that the petitioners have again proceeded with the misconceived notion that the Select List and Reserve List were to be prepared on all India basis on single merit. It is pertinent to mention here that as per the Scheme of the advertisement, vacancies were not only categorized with reference to State, but were also separate and distinct with reference to naxal/military affected areas, border areas and general areas even within the State and therefore merit was rightly drawn with reference to each unit separately. Once it is established that the candidature of the petitioner was rejected on account of low merit, no relief can be granted to such petitioners. The list of purported similarly situated candidates supplied by the petitioners have been sufficiently controverted by the respondents and it is not deemed necessary to repeat those reasons mentioned in the impugned order dated 22.02.2018. However, it is clarified that if any candidate low in merit has been erroneously appointed, then the respondent shall take necessary steps, in accordance with law, to rectify such error(s). In view of the above, the contention of the petitioners that similarly situated persons have been given appointment, being baseless and without merit, is rejected.

13. The next issue which falls into consideration of this Court is with respect to diversion of candidates from the surplus State (in the instant case(s), the State of Rajasthan) to deficit States. As per the para 10 (iv) of the advertisement dated 05.02.2011, relied upon by the petitioners, the Commission had the discretion to divert candidate from surplus State to deficit State. This discretion of the Commission was subject to the approval of MHA. It has been the contention of the petitioner that about 28,044 posts are still lying vacant in pursuance to advertisement dated 05.02.2011. However, these vacant posts are from (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM) [2023/RJJP/011482] (63 of 65) [CW-26389/2018] those States (J&K, North Eastern States and Naxal/Military affected States) wherein the MHA has directed not to fill the vacancies from candidates of surplus State. The reason for non-inclusion of these vacant posts while preparing the Reserve List is attributed to the direction of MHA not to fill the posts of Constable (GD) in those particular States. The same has also been stated clearly in the impugned order dated 22.02.2018. Once the MHA has issued direction not to divert candidates from surplus State to those particular States, the Commission had no occasion to exercise the discretion of diversion on those 28,044 posts and therefore the Reserve List was rightly prepared on all India basis from non-selected candidates of surplus State against the vacancies that remained unfilled in deficit States (except J&K, North Eastern States and naxal/military affected States). The Allahabad High Court, on being faced with similar controversy, in the case of Ajit Singh vs. UOI (supra), which has been upheld by the Apex Court, also observed and held as under:

"17. An affidavit has been filed by the Deputy Director of the Commission on 26.07.2018, in which a categorical statement is made, in paragraph no. 3, that no vacant post of Constable (GD) is available against the advertisement issued for recruitment in the year 2011. So far as issue of 28,044 posts reported to be vacant is concerned, it has been clarified that these vacancies pertain to either North-Eastern region, Jammu & Kashmir, Naxal and Militancy affected areas and that, no vacancy is available in the category to which the petitioners belong. A further reiteration is made in paragraph no. 9 of the said affidavit that there exists no change in the cut off marks for inclusion in selected list published on 28.11.2011. It is stated that most of the petitioners belong to general area of the State of Uttar Pradesh, for which category code is 33 and that, all posts pertaining to such area stand filled up. It is also stated that cut off declared on 28.11.2011 has not been compromised.

18. In view of the specific stand taken by the Commission, through the affidavit of its Deputy Director, the submission advanced on behalf of the petitioners that 28,044 posts or any other vacancy still remains available cannot be accepted. The instructions issued by the Ministry for (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM) [2023/RJJP/011482] (64 of 65) [CW-26389/2018] conduct of recruitment, already extracted above, clearly records that candidates from the surplus categories would not be adjusted against vacant positions of Jammu & Kashmir, North Eastern States and naxal and militancy areas. The action of respondents, not to fill up such posts, is thus as per the instructions issued. The petitioners' plea, in that regard, therefore, stands rejected.

(Emphasis supplied)"

14. On the issue of non-availability of record, this Court is convinced of the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents in stating that basic and relevant record is available in electronic form. The reliance placed by the petitioner on the Apex Court judgment dated 10.01.2018 in the case of Hari Om Singh vs. UOI (supra) is also misconceived for the reason that the issue therein was limited to clerical error as the merit of the petitioner was not disputed and the Apex Court was of the view that for non-availability of record to correct mere clerical error, the appellant should not be made to suffer. In this case, all the petitioners are demonstrably low in merit. The respondents have rebutted the contentions made by the petitioners on purported similarly situated candidates vide detailed speaking order dated 22.02.2018 and the petitioners have failed to demonstrate any irregularity in the same.

15. It is also required to be noted that unfulfilled vacancies, if any, for a particular year are carried forward to subsequent year of recruitment examination and subsequent to 2011, selection processes have been undertaken for specific vacancies in the year 2012, 2013, 2015 and 2018 and final result of these examinations have also been declared. Therefore, as on date, no vacancies exist in pursuance to the advertisement dated 05.02.2011. The said fact is also corroborated by MHA letters dated 30.09.2019 and 12.12.2019 (Annexure-AA/5). (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM)

[2023/RJJP/011482] (65 of 65) [CW-26389/2018]

16. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that the impugned order dated 22.02.2018 is just and legal and that the candidature of the petitioners was rightly rejected on account of their low merit.

17. Accordingly, the present bunch of writ petitions, being absolutely devoid of merits, are dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(SAMEER JAIN), J ANIL SHARMA /1-80 (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:32:41 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur