Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Ct. 55 vs Sg on 24 September, 2025

Item-                                    WPA 22920 of 2025
        24-09-2025
  39.
                                       Bijoy @ Santosh Gupta
         Ct. 550                              Versus
 sg
                                    State of West Bengal & Ors.


                          Mrs. Sutapa Sanyal
                          Mr. Anindya Halder
                                                      ...for the petitioner
                          Mr. Jayanta Samanta
                                                      ...for the State


                     1.   The Sate Legal Services Authority, West Bengal, has

                          filed the present writ petition on behalf of the life convict

                          namely, Bijoy @ Santosh Gupta, who was convicted in

                          connection with Titagarh P.S. Case No. 254/04 dated 10-

                          08-2004 under Sections 302/120B/34 IPC and under

                          Section 25(1)(A)/27(1)(A)/35 of the Arms Act. He has

                          undergone imprisonment more than 20 years for

                          premature release.

                     2.   The petitioner has prayed for pre-mature release of the

                          life convict since the guidelines prescribed by the

                          National Legal Services Authority as well as Hon'ble

                          Apex Court are not being followed by the respondent

authorities.

3. I have gone through the National Legal Services Authority's Standard Operating Procedure on the process of Premature Release, Parole and Furlough of Prisoners, 2002 and also Section 62 of the West Bengal Correctional Services Act, 1992.

4. In view of the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the State should not wait for convict's application for 2 premature release and should take appropriate steps periodically.

5. It prima facie appears that it is not followed in this matter.

6. Accordingly, the respondent authorities are directed to consider the prayer of the convict/petitioner, Bijoy @ Santosh Gupta, in accordance with the relevant guidelines and laws as mentioned above and to pass appropriate order in connection with the prayer of the convict Bijoy @ Santosh Gupta.

7. With this direction, the instant writ petition is deposed.

8. The life convict be informed of this order through the State Legal Services Authority, West Bengal accordingly.

9. It is true that his prayer for premature release was refused by the State Sentence Review Board on earlier occasion. However, considering his period for detention and also the fact that the correctional authority has submitted a fresh conduct report, the respondent authorities are directed to re-consider his prayer for premature release of the petitioner in accordance with the guidelines mentioned above and Section 61(2) of West Bengal Correctional Services Act, 1992.

10. The order dated 06.06.2022 passed by the State Sentence Review Board is hereby set aside.

11. With this direction, the present writ application being WPA 22920 of 2025 is disposed of.

12. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

3

(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)