Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Agri K.P.T.Ganesan vs The Ministry Of Finance on 24 February, 2017

Bench: A.Selvam, P.Kalaiyarasan

        

 

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT               

DATED: 24.02.2017  

CORAM   

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM           
and 
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN             

W.P(MD)No.22244 of 2016   

Agri K.P.T.Ganesan                              ..  Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Ministry of Finance,
   Department of Economic Affairs,
   Union of India, New Delhi.

2.The Governor,
   Reserve Bank of India,
   New Delhi.                                   ..  Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying for the issuance of a Writ of Declaration, declaring that the bank
notes of the denomination value of Rs.2,000/- is not valid.


For Petitioner                  : Mr.S.Doraisamy 

For Respondent No.1     : Mr.D.Saravanan,
                                  Central Government Senior
                                  Standing Counsel.

        For Respondent No.2     : Mr.K.R.Laxman  



:ORDER  

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to declare that the bank notes of denomination value of Rs.2,000/- is not valid, by way of issuing a writ of declaration.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has represented to the effect that in Rs.2,000/- currency notes Article 343(1) of the Constitution of India has not been followed and under the said circumstances the same is invalid.

3.It is represented on the side of the respondents that similar matters are pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

4.Considering the nature of the relief sought in the writ petition and also considering the fact that similar matters are pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition and therefore this writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

5.In fine, this writ petition is dismissed without costs. However liberty is given to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

To

1.The Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, Union of India, New Delhi.

2.The Governor, Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi..