Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Dr.S Satyanarayana vs Ministry Of Human Resource Development on 6 August, 2013

                      CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                           Club Building (Near Post Office)
                        Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067
                                Tel: +91-11-26105682


                           File No.CIC/RM/A/2013/000001


Appellant:                                     Dr. S. Satyanarayana, Secunderabad



Public Authority:                              University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad

Date of Hearing:                               06.08.2013



Date of decision:                              06.08.2013



Heard today, dated 06.08.2013 through video conferencing.

Appellant is present along with Shri Sambasiva Rao.

The Public Authority is represented by Shri Vijay Saradhi, Dy Registrar In-charge,
Shri A.Gopi, Asstt Registrar, Shri Avinash, Office Superintendent.

FACTS

Vide RTI dt 4.3.12, appellant had sought photocopies of applications of those candidates who had been called for interview for the post of Reader, Associate Professor, Lecturer, Asstt Professor in the Department of Telugu, vide their advertisement dt 1.1.10.

2. CPIO vide letter dt 21.3.12, informed the appellant to deposit Rs 10000 as photocopying charges.

3. An appeal was filed on 12.9.12.

4. AA vide order dt 29.9.12, observed that the appellant had vide his earlier letter dt 30.1.12 had clearly mentioned that he needed attested copies enclosed to the application. Accordingly, decision of the CPIO was upheld.

5. Submissions made by the appellant and public authority were heard. Dy Registrar submitted that they are willing to allow inspection of the concerned records to the appellant and he may indicate the pages which he requires to be photocopied. Appellant was agreeable to the above.

DECISION 1

6. The Commission directs the PIO to provide inspection of the concerned records to the appellant on a mutually convenient date and time within two weeks from date of receipt of the order.

The appeal is disposed of.

Sd/-

(Rajiv Mathur) Central Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy forwarded to:

The CPIO University of Hyderabad P.O. Central University, Prof.C.R.Rao Road Gachibowli, Hyderabad -500046 The Registrar & First Appellate Authority University of Hyderabad P.O. Central University, Prof.C.R.Rao Road Gachibowli, Hyderabad -500046 Dr. S Satyanarayana Shyamlal, H No. 1-11-87 & 88 Begumpet, Beat -19, Secunderabad -16 (Raghubir Singh) Deputy Registrar .08.2013 2