Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Ratansinh Ramsinh Rathod vs The State Of Gujarat on 8 August, 2018

Author: P.P.Bhatt

Bench: P.P.Bhatt

       R/CR.MA/13787/2018                           ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 13787 of 2018

==========================================================
                       RATANSINH RAMSINH RATHOD
                                 Versus
                         THE STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR BC DAVE(245) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
MR H K PATEL, APP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.P.BHATT

                            Date : 08/08/2018

                             ORAL ORDER

1. The   present   application   is   filed   under   Section  439   of   the   Code   of   Criminal   Procedure   by   the  applicant for regular bail in connection with First  Information Report being C.R.No.I­122/2017 registered  with   Kadodara   GIDC   Police   Station,   Surat   for   the  offences   punishable   under   Sections   395,   397   and  120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. 

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well  as   learned   Additional   Public   Prosecutor   for   the  respondent­State. 

3. Learned   advocate   for   the  applicant   submitted  that the applicant is an innocent person, however, he  Page 1 of 6 R/CR.MA/13787/2018 ORDER has been falsely implicated in the alleged offences.  It   is   further   submitted   that   investigation   is   over  and   chargesheet   is   filed.   Therefore,   there   is   no  possibility to temper with the evidence. It is also  submitted   that   co­accused   namely   Amarsinh   Indrasinh  Suaavat   and   Vikramsinh   @   Shaktisinh   Hanumansinh  Suawat   have   been   enlarged   on   bail   vide   order   dated  04.05.2018 in Criminal Misc. Application No. 7903 of  2018 and Criminal Misc. Application No. 4974 of 2018  respectively.   The   copy   of   the   orders   are   annexed  herewith   at   Annexure­C   collectively.   It   is   also  submitted that other two co­accused namely Vishalsinh  Bhairavsinh   Kharvad   and   Jagdish   @   Kadu   Shankarnath  Yogi have been enlarged on bail by the Sessions court  vide   order   dated   14.05.2018   in   Criminal   Misc.  Application   No.   221   of   2018   and   23.05.2018   in  Criminal Misc. Application No. 233 of 2018. The copy  of   this   orders   are   annexed   herewith.   It   is   also  submitted that the entire muddamal has been recovered  from   another   accused.   There   are   no   criminal  antecedent   of   the   present   applicant.   It   is   further  submitted that from the other chargesheet papers as  well as the FIR, there is no prima facie case against  Page 2 of 6 R/CR.MA/13787/2018 ORDER the present applicant for committing alleged offence.  It is further submitted that the applicant is ready  and willing to abide by the terms and conditions that  may be imposed by this Court and therefore, there is  no possibility of tampering with the evidence. It is  further submitted that applicant is having roots in  District   ­   Udepur,   State   ­   Rajasthan   and   having  responsibility   to   look   after   his   family,   and  therefore,   he  is  not   likely   to  run   away  or   abscond  and his presence can be secured at the time of trial  by imposing appropriate conditions as may be deemed,  fit and proper by this Court. Therefore, considering  the nature and gravity of the accusation made against  the   applicant   and   the   role   attributed   to   the  applicant,   he  may   be   enlarged   on   regular   bail   by  imposing suitable conditions. 

4. Learned   Additional   Public   Prosecutor   appearing  for the respondent­State has opposed the application  for grant of regular bail looking to the nature and  gravity of the offence. He has further submitted that  from the FIR as well as chargesheet papers, there is  a  prima   facie  case   against   the   present   applicant.  Therefore, the present application may be rejected.  Page 3 of 6

R/CR.MA/13787/2018 ORDER

5.   Regard being  had to the above submissions, in  the   facts   and   circumstances   of   the   case   and  considering the nature and gravity of accusation made  against the applicant in the First Information Report  and   other   chargesheet   papers,   this   Court   is   of   the  view that discretion is required to be exercised in  favour   of   the   applicant   for   grant   of   bail   as   the  chargesheet   is   filed,   therefore,   now   there   is   no  possibility of tampering with the evidence. Moreover,  the applicant assures that he will abide by the terms  and conditions that may be imposed by the Court and  shall   not   commit   any   breach.   Hence,   the   present  application is allowed and the  applicant is  ordered  to be released on regular bail in connection with the  FIR being  C.R.No.I­122/2017  registered with  Kadodara  GIDC   Police   Station,   Surat  on   his   executing   a  personal   bond   of  Rs.10,000/­  (Rupees   Ten   Thousand  Only)   with   one   surety   of   the   like   amount   to   the  satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, and subject  to   the   following   conditions,   that   the  applicant  shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or  misuse liberty;

[b] not   act   in   a   manner   injurious   to   the  Page 4 of 6 R/CR.MA/13787/2018 ORDER interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender   passport,   if   any,   to   the   lower  court within a week;

[d] not enter into the State of Gujarat except  for the purpose of marking of presence and  attending the trial.

[e] mark   presence   before   the   concerned   Police  Station   on   every   Monday   of   each   English  calendar month for a period of three months  and   thereafter,   alternate   Monday   for   a  period   of  six  months,   between   11:00   a.m.  and 2:00 p.m.;

[f] furnish   latest   and   permanent   address   of  residence to the Investigating Officer, and  also to the Court at the time of execution  of   the   bond,   and   shall   not   change   the  residence   without   prior   permission   of   this  Court;

6. The authorities will release the  applicant  only  if he is not required  in connection with any other  offence for the time being. If breach of any of the  above   conditions   is   committed,   the   Sessions   Judge  concerned   will   be   free   to   issue   warrant   or   take  appropriate   action   in   the   matter.   Bail   bond   to   be  executed   before   the   learned   Lower   Court   having  jurisdiction   to   try   the   case.   It   will   be   open   for  the   concerned   Court   to   delete,   modify   and/or   relax  Page 5 of 6 R/CR.MA/13787/2018 ORDER any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.  At   the   trial,   learned   trial   court   shall   not   be  influenced   by   the   observations   of   preliminary  nature, qua the evidence at this stage made by this  Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. 

8. Rule   is   made   absolute   to   the   aforesaid   extent.  Direct service is permitted. 

(P.P.BHATT, J) N.V.MEWADA Page 6 of 6