Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Adolf Xavier Aged 56 Years vs Unknown on 9 April, 2014

Author: Thomas P.Joseph

Bench: Thomas P.Joseph

       

  

  

 
 
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT:

             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH

      WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL 2014/19TH CHAITHRA, 1936

                   Bail Appl..No. 2483 of 2014 ()
                   -------------------------------
  CRIME NO. 1238/2013 OF ALAPPUZHA SOUTH POLICE STATION , ALAPPUZHA

     PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
     -------------------

       ADOLF XAVIER AGED 56 YEARS
       S/O XAVIER, RETIRED HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER
       RESIDING AT KALLUKULAM HOUSE, KAITHAVANA WARD
       SANATHANAPURAM P.O., PAZHAVEEDU VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA.

       BY ADV. SRI.MAURICE VINCENT

     RESPONDNET/STATE:
     -----------------

       STATE OF KERALA
       REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
       MANNANCHERRY POLICE STATION
       BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA
       ERNAKULAM.

       BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR: ADV LALIZA

THIS BAIL APPLICATION  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON  09-04-2014,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:



                    THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.
            ====================================
                      B.A. No.2483 of 2014
            ====================================
             Dated this the 09th day of April, 2014

                           O R D E R

Petitioner is accused in Crime No.1238 of 2013 of the Alappuzha South Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 403, 406, 465, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, apprehends arrest and has filed this application.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application. It is submitted that the petitioner was entrusted with renovation work of four roads by the Alappuzha Municipality. An agreement was executed on 18.03.2013. The petitioner did not complete the work but on the strength of the forged documents, collected Rs.6,64,672/- from the said Municipality.

Learned counsel submits that the allegations are not true. According to the learned counsel, the petitioner is not having connection with the case as the prosecution alleges. It is also submitted that the petitioner was spending money from his pocket to complete the work.

3. Having heard both sides, it is revealed that even using bills on the strength of unsigned documents, the petitioner used B.A. No.2483 of 2014 -: 2 :- to collect money from the Municipality. I wonder how this could be possible unless there is connivance of the officials concerned. This is a matter which the investigating Officer has to look into. It also remains to be seen how without verifying the work bills were passed.

4. Having heard both sides I an not inclined to grant relief to the petitioner.

Application is dismissed.

THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE.

vsv