Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Marico Limited vs Morvin India Health Care Private ... on 12 February, 2026

             Digitally
             signed by
             SHAGUFTA
   2026:BHC-OS:4178
SHAGUFTA     QUTBUDDIN
QUTBUDDIN PATHAN
PATHAN       Date:                                                 502-COMIP-L-32513-2024.odt
             2026.02.13
             14:41:03
             +0530

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                            IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

                                COMMERCIAL IP SUIT (STAMP) NO.32513 OF 2024

                   Marico Limited                               ... Plaintiff
                           Versus
                   Morvin India Health Care Private Limited &
                   Ors.                                       ... Defendants
                                                    WITH
                          INTERIM APPLICATION (LODGING) NO.32651 OF 2024
                                                   WITH
                             LEAVE PETITION (LODGING) NO.32762 OF 2024
                                                    IN
                            COMMERCIAL IP Suit (STAMP) NO.32513 OF 2024
                                                   WITH
                               COURT RECEIVER'S REPORT NO.508 OF 2024

                   Marico Limited                               ... Applicant/
                                                                  Petitioner
                   IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
                   Marico Limited                               .... Plaintiff
                           Versus
                   Morvin India Health Care Private Limited &
                   Ors.                                       ... Defendants
                                        ______________
                   Ms. Rakshita Singh i/b Khaitan & Co. for the Plaintiff/
                   Applicant/Petitioner

                   Mr. Saurav N. Katkar for the Defendant Nos. 1 to 5

                   Mr. Nayankumar P. Fadadu, Defendant No.5, is present through VC
                                        ______________


       SQ Pathan                                                                                     1/3



                    ::: Uploaded on - 13/02/2026                ::: Downloaded on - 13/02/2026 22:29:26 :::
                                                                 502-COMIP-L-32513-2024.odt


                                               CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.

THURSDAY, 12th FEBRUARY 2026 P.C :

1 Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Production Board.
2 This Court is informed that the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties. Insofar as Defendant Nos. 6 and 7 are concerned, the Suit has already been settled between the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 6 and 7. The Consent Terms are tendered, taken on record, and marked "X" for identification. By the said Consent Terms, the Suit is settled between the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
3 The Consent Terms are signed by the authorised signatory of the Plaintiff; by the Director of Defendant No. 1; by the partner and authorised signatory of Defendant No. 2 and Defendant No.3; by the Constituted Attorney of Defendant No. 4;

and by Defendant No. 5. Defendant No. 5 is present through video conferencing and reiterates the terms and conditions of the Consent Terms. The Defendant No. 2 is the Director of Defendant SQ Pathan 2/3 ::: Uploaded on - 13/02/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 13/02/2026 22:29:26 ::: 502-COMIP-L-32513-2024.odt No. 1, the partner and authorised signatory of Defendant Nos. 2 and 3, and Constituted Attorney of Defendant No. 4. 4 The statements made in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings given to this Court. 5 The Suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b),

(c), and (e) of the Plaint. Refund of court fees as per rules. 6 The Interim Application does not survive for consideration and stands disposed of. 7 The Court Receiver's report is disposed of. The Court Receiver stands discharged without passing of accounts. All costs, charges, and expenses of the Court Receiver to be paid by the Plaintiff within a period of eight days of demand being raised by the Court Receiver.

8 As the Suit has been settled between the parties, the leave petition is allowed.

SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.

SQ Pathan 3/3 ::: Uploaded on - 13/02/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 13/02/2026 22:29:26 :::