Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Uoi vs Kuldeep Kumar on 7 March, 2014

r
ITEM NO.11                  Court No.5              SECTION XVII


              S U P R E M E    C O U R T   O F    I N D I A
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

    CIVIL APPEAL D.NO(s). 4602 OF 2014 (For Prel. Hearing)


UOI & ORS                                               Appellant (s)

                   VERSUS

KULDEEP KUMAR                                           Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for leave to appeal u/s 31(1) of the        Armed   Forces   Tribunal
Act, 2007 and office report )


Date: 07/03/2014    This Petition was called on for hearing today.


CORAM :
          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR
          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN


For Petitioner(s)           Mr. R.Balasubramaniun, Adv.
                            MS. Anindita Pujari, Adv.
                            Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.


For Respondent(s)


             UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                                 O R D E R

Heard.

Apart from the fact that this application seeking leave to appeal is inordinately delayed by 1097 days for which no cogent explanation is forthcoming from the appellants, we find no substantial question of law of general public importance arising for our consideration. The application for grant of leave to appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

|(Shashi Sareen) | |(Veena Khera) | |Court Master | |Court Master | (Signed order is placed on the file) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. D 4602 OF 2014 |UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. |...| Appellant(s) | | Versus | |KULDEEP KUMAR |...| Respondent(s) | O R D E R Heard.

Apart from the fact that this application seeking leave to appeal is inordinately delayed by 1097 days for which no cogent explanation is forthcoming from the appellants, we find no substantial question of law of general public importance arising for our consideration. The application for grant of leave to appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

......................J. (T.S.THAKUR) ......................J. (C.NAGAPPAN) New Delhi, March 07, 2014.