Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Chattisgarh High Court

Gopal Prasad Chouhan vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 December, 2021

                                            1


                                                                                 NAFR

                 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                    WPS No. 6411 of 2021

     • Gopal Prasad Chouhan S/o Shri Maya Ram Chouhan Aged About 37 Years
       Working As Lecturer And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Farsatoli,
       Block Pathalgaon, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh

                                                                          ---- Petitioner

                                         Versus

     1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And
        Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar New Raipur
        District Raipur Chhattisgarh

     2. Director Office Of Directorate Of Panchayat, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

     3. Chief Executive Office Zila Panchayat Jashpur District Jashpur Chhattisgarh

     4. Block Education Officer Pathalgaon, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh

                                                                     ---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State : Ms. Sunita Jain, Govt. Adv.

S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 07/12/2021 Heard.

1. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue involved in this petition is covered by decision rendered by this Court in the case of Avinesh Kumar Namdev and ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh and ors. (WPS No.5328/2021) in which in paragraphs 5 and 6, this Court observed -

"5. Given the limited grievance that the petitioners have i.e. for clearance of the arrears of payment at the earliest and considering 2 the fact that it is almost 10 months now that the decision of the respondents Annexure P/3 was taken on 22.12.2020, ends of justice would serve if the writ petition at this juncture disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that the entire arrears of payment payable to the petitioners are cleared at the earliest preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, failing which the entire amount shall carry interest @ 10% p.a. from the date of order Annexure P/3 dated 22.12.2020 till the actual date of payment is made.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of."

2. Accepting the submission of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is finally disposed off in terms of paragraphs 5 and 6 passed in the case of Avinesh Kumar Namdev (supra). No order as to cost (s).

Sd/--

( Sanjay K. Agrawal ) Judge Deepti