Telangana High Court
Smt. N. Mahalakshmi vs The State Of Telangana, And 3 Others on 23 July, 2019
Author: P. Naveen Rao
Bench: P.Naveen Rao
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.15245 OF 2019
Date:23.07.2019
Between:
Smt. N. Mahalakshmi, W/o. Bhanu Babu,
Aged 39 years, Occ: Household,
R/o.H.No.6-157/1, Boyawada Road,
Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District .. Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana, rep., by its
Principal Secretary to Government,
Panchayat Raj and Rural Development
Department, Telangana Secretariat,
Hyderabad and others .. Respondents
The Court made the following:
2
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.15245 OF 2019
ORDER:
Petitioner contested as Councilor to Ward No.9 of Ibrahimpatnam Nagar Panchayat, Ranga Reddy District, in the elections held in the year 2014. Alleging that petitioner did not file election expenditure, order was passed on 10.07.2017 by the State Election Commission declaring the petitioner as ineligible for three years from the date of issue of that order to contest any election to be held for any office under the provisions of Telangana Municipalities Act, 1965.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State Election Commission. Learned counsel appearing for State Election Commission agrees that subject matter of the writ petition is covered by the decision of learned single judge of this Court rendered in W.P.No.2630 of 2018 and batch on 20.03.2019.
3. From the reading of the order impugned, it is apparent that no prior notice was issued before passing such order and notice was not issued within reasonable time from the date of conclusion of election process.
4. In W.P.No.2630 of 2018 and batch, dated 20.03.2019, learned single Judge of this Court considered the issue in detail and held such action of the State Election Commission in disqualifying the candidates on the ground that they did not file election expenditure in the elections held in the year 2014 after 3 long lapse of time as illegal, and amounts to arbitrary exercise of power, and set aside the similar orders passed against the petitioners therein.
5. Following the earlier orders of this Court, this Writ Petition is also allowed by setting aside the order impugned. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed.
_____________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J Date:23.07.2019 KH