Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court of India

Collector Of Central Excise, Hyderabad vs Hyderabad Race Club, Malakpet, ... on 19 November, 1996

Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 1996 SC 923

Bench: S.P. Bharucha, K. Venkataswami

           PETITIONER:
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD

	Vs.

RESPONDENT:
HYDERABAD RACE CLUB, MALAKPET, HYDERABAD

DATE OF JUDGMENT:	19/11/1996

BENCH:
S.P. BHARUCHA, K. VENKATASWAMI




ACT:



HEADNOTE:



JUDGMENT:

J U D G M E N T BHARUCHA. J.

The Revenue challenges the correctness of the order of Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal which holds that the totaliser system installed at the race course of the respondents was not liable to excise duty. Upon the record before it, the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the totaliser was embedded in the earth and was not 'goods' upon which excise duty was leviable.

Having regard to the judgment that we have just delivered in C.A. No. 2919/86, M/s Mittal Engineering works (P) Ltd. vs. Collector of Central Excise, Meerut, and the content of a totaliser or tote machine employed at a race course as found by the Tribunal upon the evidence, the same is not 'goods' for the purposes of levy of excise duty.

The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.