Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Pandula Devid Harsan vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 18 February, 2026

                                                                                                   1:


/
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

                 WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
                           TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

                                           :PRESENT:

                THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
                      CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8010 OF 2023

    Between:

        1.   Pandula Devid Harsan, S/o Peter, Aged about 55yrs                                     .
       2.    Pandula Jyothi, W/o David Harson, Aged about 50yrs
        3.   Pandula George Bush, S/o David Harson, Aged about 30yrs
       4.    Pandula Kranthi Kumar, S/o David Harson, Aged about 28yrs
        5.   Pandula John David, S/o Peter, Aged about 40yrs
       6.    Pandula Krupamma, W/o John David, Aged about 35yrs
             All are residents of Mundalmur village & Mandal, Prakasam District
                                                        ...Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 to 7

                                                AND

        1.   The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Publis Prosecutor High Court of
             Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.

                                                                 ...Respondent/Complainant


       2.    Thatapudi Shanta Kumar, S/o Thatapudi Yesu Dasu R/o Mundlamuru
             village and mandal Prakasam district
                                                      ...Respondent/DefactoComplainant
             Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is filed praying                  that   in   the

    circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the
    Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in
    C.C.No.737/2022      on   the   file   of   the   Judicial    I   Class   Magistrate,   Darsi,
    Prakasam District to the extent of petitioners concerned in the interest of
    justice.
 J




    lA NO: 1 OF 2023

               Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.      is filed    praying that in the
    circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the
    petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings
    including appearance of the petitioners in C.C.No.737/2022 on the file of the
    Judicial I Class Magistrate, Darsi, Prakasam District, pending disposal of
    CRLP No. 8010 of 2023, on the file of the High Court.
               The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and
    memorandum of grounds filed herein and the High Court                    order   dated

    13.10.2023 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P Nagendra
    Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and of Public Prosecutor                   for   the

    respondent No.1 and of Sri I. Koti Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No.2-,
    the Court made the following
    ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. At the request of the learned counsel for the 2"'* respondent, list orl 05.03.2026, as a last chance.

Interim order granted earlier on 13.10.2023 is extended until the next date of hearing.

SD/-A.VIJAYA BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Darsi, Prakasam District.

2. One CC to Sri P Nagendra Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor (AP) High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]

4. One spare copy AJ HIGH COURT PR YLR,J DATED:18.02.2026 LIST ON 05.03.2026, AS A LAST CHANCE ORDER CRLP.No.801 Oof 2023 INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED