Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Mr. Rajeev Jain vs Auto Hanger (India) Pvt Ltd & Anr. on 21 February, 2011

  
 
 
 
 BEFORE THE HON



 

 
    
     
     


       
          
           
           


            BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 
        
         
           
           


          COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
        
      
    
     

 
  
   
     
     

 
  
   
     
     
        
         
         
            
             
             


            Complaint Case No. CC/09/1
          
        
         

 
      
       
         
         


         
      
       
         
         
            
             
             
                
                 
                 

1.

MR. RAJEEV JAIN JAISONS HOUSE 13 TH ROAD KHAR MUMBAI 400052     ...........Complainant(s) Versus

1. AUTO HANGER (INDIA) PVT LTD RAJAN HOUSE GR FLOOR APPA SAHEB MARATHE MARG PRABHADEVI MUMBAI  

2. MERCEDES BENZ INDIA PVT.LTD.

SECTOR 15-A, CHIKHALI, PIMPRI PUNE-18   ............Opp.Party(s)     BEFORE:

   
Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar PRESIDING MEMBER   Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar Member     PRESENT:
Ms.Rashmi Manne,Advocate, Proxy for U.WAVIKAR, Advocate for the Complainant   Ms.Deeksha Dadwal, Advocate Proxy for Hariani & Co. for opponent No.1.
Mr.M.S. Pandit, Advocate for opponent No.2.
       
ORDER Per Shri P.N. Kashalkar, Honble Presiding Judicial Member           It appears that complainant is satisfied with the repairs and jobs carried out to his car by the opponents.  He has recorded satisfaction in the letter dated 31/01/2011.  He has also taken vehicle back from the opponents.  Opponent No.2 therefore submits that the Commission should dispose of the complaint with consent of parties to this complaint.  Advocate Ms.Rashmi Manne appearing for the complainant agrees with the submissions made by Advocate Mr.Pandit in this behalf.  As repairs have been carried out to the satisfaction of the complainant to his car, no consumer dispute remains.  As such we pass the following order :-
                   -: ORDER :-
1.       Complaint stands dismissed as there is no surviving consumer dispute.
2.       No order as to costs.
3.       Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.
 

Pronounced Dated 21st February 2011.

     

[Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar] PRESIDING MEMBER       [Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar] Member dd