Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Himanshu Mohta And Associates vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 March, 2021

Author: Rajiv Shakdher

Bench: Rajiv Shakdher, Talwant Singh

$~6, 11, 12, 13 & 15
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
6
+       W.P.(C) 13154/2019
        HIMANSHU MOHTA AND ASSOCIATES              ..... Petitioner
                         Through: Ms. Shivanshi Karnani, Advocate

                                versus

        UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                              ..... Respondents
                      Through:           Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing
                                         Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur,
                                         Advocate for R-2.
11
+       W.P.(C) 6293/2019
        BHARTI TELEMEDIA LTD.                     ..... Petitioner
                         Through: Mr. Deepak Thakur, Advocate

                                versus

        UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                              ..... Respondents
                      Through:           Mr. Ruchir Mishra and Mr. Mukesh
                                         Kumar Tiwari, Advocate for UOI.
                                         Ms. Sonu Bhatnagar, Senior Standing
                                         Counsel with Ms. Venus Mehrotra,
                                         Advocate for R-3 and R-4.

12
+       W.P.(C) 13097/2019 & CM APPL.53392/2019
        SALES TAX, BAR ASSOCIATION ( REGD,). & ANR.
                                                         ..... Petitioner
                         Through: Ms. Shivanshi Karnani, Advocate.

                                versus

        UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                              ..... Respondents
W.P.(C) 13154/2019 & conn. matters                               Page 1
                                 Through:   Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing
                                           Counsel with Ms. Sohani Mathur,
                                           Advocate for R-2.
13
+       W.P.(C) 6914/2020
        BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED                     ..... Petitioner
                         Through: Mr. Deepak Thakur, Advocate

                                versus

        UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                ..... Respondents
                      Through:             Ms. Sonu Bhatnagar, Senior Standing
                                           Counsel with Ms. Venus Mehrotra,
                                           Advocate for R-3 to R-6.
15
+       W.P.(C) 6895/2020
        BHARTI TELEMEDIA LIMITED                  ..... Petitioner
                         Through: Mr. Deepak Thakur, Advocate

                                versus

        UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                ..... Respondents
                      Through:             Ms. Sonu Bhatnagar, Senior Standing
                                           Counsel with Ms. Venus Mehrotra,
                                           Advocate for R-3 to R-5.

        CORAM:
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
                      ORDER

% 01.03.2021 (Physical Court Hearing)

1. A request for accommodation is made on behalf of the respondents. 1.1 The request is not opposed.

2. According to learned counsel for the respondents, counter affidavits W.P.(C) 13154/2019 & conn. matters Page 2 have been filed in W.P.(C) Nos. 6293/2019, 6914/2020 and 6895/2020. 2.1 Learned counsel for the respondents say that the counter affidavits filed in the aforementioned matters will be adopted in the remaining matters. 2.2. The statement of the counsel for the respondents is taken on record.

3. We are informed that rejoinders have also been filed in the W.P.(C) Nos. 6293/2019, 6914/2020 and 6895/2020.

4. Although this Court had indicated that no further adjournments will be given irrespective of the fact that whether the pleadings are complete or not, since learned counsel for the petitioner has acceded to the request for adjournment, list the captioned matters on 10.05.2021.

5. In the meanwhile, learned counsel for the parties will file their written submissions not exceeding three pages each at least three days prior to the next date of hearing.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J TALWANT SINGH, J MARCH 1, 2021/mr Click here to check corrigendum, if any W.P.(C) 13154/2019 & conn. matters Page 3