Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Raheja Vistas Phase Iv Building No T5 And ... vs The Divisional Joint Registrar, Co ... on 22 July, 2022

Author: Nitin W. Sambre

Bench: Nitin W. Sambre

                       (7)-WP-8696 & 4790-22.doc.


                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  WRIT PETITION NO.8696 OF 2022
                                               WITH
          Digitally


BALAJI
          signed by
          BALAJI
          GOVINDRAO
                               WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.4790 OF 2021
GOVINDRAO PANCHAL
PANCHAL   Date:
          2022.07.26
          16:09:50
          +0530
                       Raheja Vistas Phase IV Building No.T5
                       & T6 Co-operative Housing Society Limited     ..Petitioner
                            Versus
                       The Divisional Joint Registrar
                       Co-operative Societies, Pune Division
                       Pune & Anr.                                   ..Respondents

                       Mr. Radhikesh Uttarwar i/by Shrikant D. Patil a/w Arjun
                       Pawar & Pooja Thakur, for the Petitioner.
                       Mr. Girish Godbole a/w Hemlata Jain, Sukhada Wagle &
                       Aishwarya Wagle i/by Varitas Legal, for the Respondent
                       No.2.

                                                    CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 22nd JULY, 2022 P.C.

1. The consent terms in the form of draft order duly signed by the authorized signatory of the petitioner and respondent No.2 are tendered during the course of hearing by Mr. Girish Godbole, who appears for respondent No.2. According to Mr. Girish Godbole, paragraphs 12, 16, 20, 21, 23 and 24 are the undertakings given by the respective parties hereto of which this Court must take note of.

2. As such, according to him, the consent terms in BGP. 1 of 2 (7)-WP-8696 & 4790-22.doc.

the form of draft order resolves entire issue inter se between the parties who are signatories to it. As such, a joint request is made that the petitions be disposed of in terms of the draft order which is consented by the parties.

3. As such, the said consent terms in the form of draft order are taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

4. Both the petitions accordingly stand disposed of in terms of the said consent terms.




                               [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]




BGP.                                                   2 of 2