Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Patel Manubhai Nanabhai vs State Of Gujarat on 22 March, 2018

Author: R.M.Chhaya

Bench: R.M.Chhaya

       C/SCA/18524/2017                             ORDER




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18524 of 2017

==========================================================
                          PATEL MANUBHAI NANABHAI
                                   Versus
                             STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR KB PUJARA(680) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
DR VENUGOPAL PATEL, AGP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1-3
MR HS MUNSHAW(495) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 5
MR MANISH J PATEL(2131) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 4
NOTICE SERVED BY DS(5) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2,3
==========================================================

 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA

                              Date : 22/03/2018

                                ORAL ORDER

1. Heard   Mr.   K.B.   Pujara,   learned   counsel   for  the   petitioner,   Dr.   Venugopal   Patel,   learned  Assistant   Government   Pleader   for   the   respondent  Nos. 1 to 3, Mr. Manish J. Patel, learned counsel  for   respondent   No.   4   and   Mr.   H.S.   Munshaw,  learned counsel for the respondent No. 5.

 

2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of  the Constitution of India, petitioner has prayed  for the following reliefs:­ "(a)   to   issue   Notice   for   Final  Disposal on Returnable Date;

(b)   to   direct   the   respondents   ands  particularly   the   respondent   Nos.   3  and   4   to   modify   the   Inter­district  Page 1 of 3 C/SCA/18524/2017 ORDER transfer order dtd. 18­9­2015 as per  Annexure­D   and   to   post   the  petitioner   at   any   place   near   his  native   place   of   Jalodar,   Taluka   : 

Modasa,   dist   :   Arvali   as   the  petitioner   is   suffering   from  Physically   Disability   of   more   than  45%;"

3. The   petitioner   was   initially   appointed   as  Vidya­Sahayak as Physically Handicapped candidate  in   Kheda   District   by   an   order   dated   27/09/1999  and after completion of 5 years in fixed pay, the  petitioner   has been  placed  in regular  pay scale  on 28/09/2004 by an order dated 07/01/2005.

4. The   petitioner   belongs   to   village:   Jalodar,  Taluka:   Modasa,   District:   Aravalli   which   was  formerly in Sabarkantha District. The petitioner  applied   for   inter­district   transfer   to  Sabarkantha   District   and   instead   of   Jalodar  Primary School, the petitioner was transferred to  Patadiyavarg   Primary   School,   Matoda   Group,  Taluka: Khedbrahma, District: Sabarkantha.

5. It   is   a   matter   of   record   that   because   of  creation   of   new   District   Aravalli,   the  petitioner's   transfer   has   taken   place   when   his  native place Jalodar was in Sabarkantha District.  Considering   the   fact   that   the   petitioner   is  Physically   Handicapped,   it   is   prayed   that   his  request  for transfer  to Jalodar  or nearer  place  in Aravalli District be considered.

Page 2 of 3 C/SCA/18524/2017 ORDER

6. Considering   the   policy   of   Government  Resolution   dated   23/05/2012,   inter­district  transfer is permitted only once and therefore, as  per  the said  policy,   the petitioner  has  already  availed   the   said   benefit,   still   however,  considering   the   special   fact   that   because   of  creation   of   new   revenue   District,   problem   still  continues   and   hence,   the   present   petition   be  considered   as   an   application   of   the   petitioner  and respondent authorities shall take appropriate  decision   upon   it,   as   expeditiously   as   possible,  preferably before the next academic year.  It is,  however,   clarified   that   this   Court   has   not  expressed any opinion on merits of the matter. 

7. With   the   aforesaid   observations   and  direction,   the   petition   stands   disposed   of.  Notice discharged. There shall be no order as to  costs. 

(R.M.CHHAYA, J) N.V.MEWADA Page 3 of 3