Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Phonographic Performance Limited vs Grand Arsh on 11 November, 2025

2025:BHC-OS:20667


                                                                             52-ial-16049-2023.doc


                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                           IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

                                   INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.16049 OF 2023
                                                     IN
                                      COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO.487 OF 2025

                Phonographic Performance Limited                              ...Plaintiff
                            Versus
                Grand Arsh and Ors.                                           ...Defendants

                                         ------------
                Mr. Amogh Singh a/w. Mr. A. Nimbalkar i/b. Mr. D.P. Singh, for the
                Plaintiffs.
                                         ------------

                                               CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
                                               DATE    : NOVEMBER 11, 2025


                P. C. :

1. By order dated 17th July, 2023, ad-interim relief was granted in terms of prayer clauses (a).

2. Learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff submits that the Defendant has been duly served, however, no appearance has been caused. He would insist that the ad-interim relief be confirmed as interim relief in absence of any response by the Defendant.

3. The order of 17th July, 2023 records that the Defendant was served with notice even at the time of hearing of the ad-interim relief. None had appeared on behalf of the Defendant at that point of time Vishal Parekar 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 12/11/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 12/11/2025 20:39:16 ::: 52-ial-16049-2023.doc and even today none appears for the Defendant. While passing the order of 17th July, 2023, the Court had accepted the Plaintiff's claim of ownership and control as exclusive licensor of the public performance right of around 400 music labels and the right to grant license under Section 30 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The unauthorised broadcasting of the sound recordings by the Defendant in which the Plaintiff held copyright, was prima facie accepted by this Court and the Court had arrived at a finding that there is infringement of the copyright. There is no material which is placed on record to displace the prima facie finding arrived at by this Court. The Defendant has chosen not to appear before this Court despite service on multiple occasions. There is no reason as to why the ad-interim relief granted in the year 2023 should not be confirmed as interim relief.

4. In view of the above, the ad-interim relief in terms prayer clause

(a) is confirmed as interim relief.

5. Interim Application is allowed in the above terms.




                                          [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]




Vishal Parekar                        2 of 2




::: Uploaded on - 12/11/2025                    ::: Downloaded on - 12/11/2025 20:39:16 :::