Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Vimal Babu K vs State Of Kerala on 19 July, 2016

Author: P.B.Suresh Kumar

Bench: P.B.Suresh Kumar

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                           PRESENT:

                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

                 TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2016/28TH ASHADHA, 1938

                                 WP(C).No. 23960 of 2016 (T)
                                     ----------------------------


PETITIONER:
--------------------

                     VIMAL BABU K., S/O.GOVINDRAJ,
                    AGED 43 YEARS, KOLLANKANDY HOUSE,
                    P.O.VADAKKUMBAD, THALASSERY,
                    KANNUR-670 105.

                     BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.PRAVEEN,
                            SMT.P.SHEEBA.

RESPONDENTS:
-----------------------

        1.          STATE OF KERALA,
                     REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
                     DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION, SECRETARIAT,
                     THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-686 008.

        2.          INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION,
                     O/O. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION,
                     VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

        3.          THE SUB REGISTRAR,
                     OFFICE OF SUB REGISTRAR,
                     THALASSERY.


                    BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.GIKKU JACOB.


                    THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
                    ON 19-07-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
                    FOLLOWING:
rs.

WP(C).No. 23960 of 2016 (T)


                                   APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-


EXHIBITS P1         COPY OF THE NOTICE OF INTENDED MARRIAGE UNDER
                    SECTION 5 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT DTD 07/07/2016
                    SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBITS P2         COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE SHOWING THE SINGLE STATUS OF
                    THE WOMAN, CATHY ZARAGOSA LATUMBO ISSUED BY THE
                    NATIONAL STATISTICIAN AND CIVIL REGISTRAR GENERAL,
                    PHILIPPINERS STATISTICS AUTHORITY AUTHENTICATED BY
                    THE DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, PHILIPPINERS.

EXHIBITS P3         COPY OF THE PASSPORT ISSUED FOR TRAVELING ABROAD
                    TO CATHY LATUMBO ZARAGOSA BY THE REPUBLIC OF
                    PHILIPPINES.

EXHIBITS P4         COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DTD 07/07/2016 ISSUED BY
                    THE 3RD RESPONDENT REJECTING EXT P1 NOTICE OF
                    MARRIAGE OF THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBITS P5         COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.RR-6-23638/2014 DTD 21/10/2014
                    ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBITS P6         COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.24086/2014
                    DTD 18/09/2014 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

EXHIBITS P7         COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.19525/2016
                    DTD 07/06/2016 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.


RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:-         NIL.




                                                   //TRUE COPY//


                                                   P.S.TO JUDGE


rs.



                   P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.

                -----------------------------------

                  W.P.(C)No.23960 of 2016

         ------------------------------------------------
           Dated this the 19th day of July, 2016


                            JUDGMENT

The petitioner, a citizen of India, intends to marry a foreign national. Though he has approached the Marriage Officer concerned under the Special Marriage Act with Ext.P1 notice of the intended marriage, the Marriage Officer refused to accept the notice, submits the petitioner.

2. Identical cases have come up before this Court earlier, wherein, this Court has taken the view that there is no impediment for an Indian citizen to marry a foreign national under the Special Marriage Act. The judgment rendered by this Court in WP(C) No.29378 of 2015 is one of such cases. In the light of the judgment in the said case and other cases, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition as follows:

i. The third respondent shall receive notice of marriage under the W.P.(C)No.23960 of 2016 2 Special Marriage Act from the petitioner. ii. The date of notice has to be reckoned as today. iii.The marriage shall be registered on the expiry of 30 days from today in accordance with the provisions of the Special Marriage Act.
iv.The petitioner shall, before the registration of the marriage, produce necessary documents before the Marriage Officer to satisfy him the single status of the person with whom the marriage is proposed.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
smm