Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ghanshyam And Another vs Deputy Commissioner And Anr on 7 July, 2023

            233                                                                2023:PHHC:085764
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                    AT CHANDIGARH

                                                                         CWP-3558-2023
                                                          Date of Decision: July 07, 2023

            GHANSHYAM AND ANOTHER                                            ......petitioners
                                Versus
            DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ANR.                                 ........Respondents


            CORAM:             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

            Present:           Mr. Lalit Pardhan, Advocate for petitioner.
                               Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana.
                               Mr. Abhilaksh Gain, Advocate for NHAI.

            HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

1. By way of present petition, prayer has been made for issuance of directions to respondent No.1(Deputy Commissioner-cum- Arbitrator) to expeditiously decide reference petition No. LAC-227-2011 dated 26.05.2011 titled as "Jagdev & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors"

and LAC-462-2013 titled as "Jagdev & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors".

2. In the present case, land owned by petitioners situated in Village Dohki, Tehsil and District Rewari was acquired vide notification dated 28.09.2010 issued under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 1956 Act) followed by an award passed under Section 3E thereof on 21.04.2011. Being dissatisfied, the petitioners invoked reference under Section 3G(5) of 1956 Act bearing Nos. LAC-227-2011 and LAC-462-2013.

3. A short grievance of the petitioners at this stage is that the aforementioned two reference petitions have not been adjudicated upon finally by respondent No.1 even after the expiry of more than 10 years TEJWINDER SINGH 2023.07.11 09:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2023:PHHC:085764 CWP-3558-2023 -2- of filing. In response thereto, a status report by way of affidavit dated 04/05.05.2023 has been filed by respondent No.1 wherein the following stand has been taken:-

"4. That earlier, the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Rewari was appointed as Arbitrator under Section 3(G) of National Highway Act, 1956. Thereafter vide notification No.S.O. 2374(E) dated 05.07.2019 the Divisional Commissioner, Gurugram was appointed as Arbitrator to decide the reference petition mentioned above for the revenue estate of Rewari. After that vide notification no. S.O. 4231(E) dated 21.11.2019, the Deputy Commissioner, Rewari was appointed as the Arbitrator in place of Divisional Commissioner. The copies of the notification dated 05.11.2019 and 21.11.2019 are attached herewith as Annexure R-1/B and R-1/C."

3. In view of the aforesaid, stand taken by respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the reference petitions filed at the instance of petitioners in a time-bound manner, preferably within a period of six months from today.

4. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms.



            07.07.2023                                           ( HARKESH MANUJA )
            tejwinder                                                  JUDGE


                                    Whether speaking/reasoned               Yes/No
                                       Whether Reportable                   Yes/No




TEJWINDER SINGH
2023.07.11 09:25
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
 TEJWINDER SINGH
2023.07.11 09:25
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document