Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Rahul Naresh Puglia And Others vs Atul N. Wandile Thr. Special P.O.A. ... on 18 December, 2025

  2025:BHC-NAG:14571

                                                                   1                                52-cra 122.2025.odt


                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                    NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
                                           CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 122 OF 2025
                                           ( Rahul Naresh Puglia and others vs. Atul N. Wandile and others )
                               Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram,
                               appearances, Court's orders or the directions,                   Court's or Judge's order
                               and Registrar's orders.
                                          Mr. M. P. Khajanchi, Advocate for petitioner.
                                          Mr. A. M. Chandekar, Advocate for respondent No.1.
                                          Mr. Rahul Vyavhare, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5.

                                          CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.

DECEMBER 18, 2025

1) Learned counsel for the respondent No.1/plaintiff makes a motion on instructions from the plaintiff that Commercial Suit No.01/2024 pending before the Judge, Commercial Court, Chandrapur be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh suit on the same cause of action.

2) It appears from the perusal of the pleadings that although case of urgent interim orders is not made out, suit is filed without taking recourse or pre-institution mediation as contemplated under Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

3) Permission to withdraw Commercial Suit is granted with liberty to file afresh suit on the same cause of action. Time spent from the date of institution of suit till today shall be excluded for the purpose of computation of limitation.

4) Liberty is granted to the respondent No.1/plaintiff to make appropriate application before the learned Trial Court for refund of Court fees.

( ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. ) KOLHE Signed by: Mr. Ravikant Kolhe Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 19/12/2025 16:26:04