Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Thang Khan Tuang Hatzaw vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors on 3 September, 2020

Author: Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Bench: Sanjay Kumar Medhi

                                                                 Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010107022020




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : WP(C) 3147/2020

         1:THANG KHAN TUANG HATZAW
         S/O. KHAM KHAN PAU, PRESENTLY POSTED AS CMO (NFSG) 31ST BN. SSB,
         GOSSAIGAON, P.O. GOSSAIGAON, DIST. KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM.

         VERSUS

         1:THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS.
         REP. BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK,
         NEW DELHI-110001.

         2:DIRECTOR GENERAL
          SASHASTRA SEEMA BAL (SSB)
          FHQ
          EAST BLOCK-V
          R.K. PURAM
          NEW DELHI-110066.

         3:INSPECTOR GENERAL (MEDICAL)
          SSB
          FHQ
          EAST BLOCK-V
          R.K. PURAM
          NEW DELHI-110066.

         4:INSPECTOR GENERAL
          FTR HQ
          SSB
          GUWAHATI
          NIKITA COMPLEX
          KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-781022
         ASSAM.

         5:COMMANDANT
          31ST BN.
                                                                                  Page No.# 2/2

             SSB
             GOSSAIGAON-783360
             KOKRAJHAR
             ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. K PAUL

Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.




                                   BEFORE
                  HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

                                             ORDER

03-09-2020 Heard Shri K. Paul, learned counsel for the petitioner, who is aggrieved by the delay in the process of release of financial benefits under the Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme (DACP). It is the case of the petitioner that in an earlier occasion, this Court had passed an order dated 02.02.2017 in WP(C) No. 4361/2016 to take a decision within a period of 2(two) months.

Issue Notice.

Shri Bora, learned CGC accepts notice on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 5. Extra copies of the writ petition be served upon him by tomorrow. The Notice is made returnable by 4(four) weeks. It is needless to observe that pendency of this case shall not be a bar for payment of the admissible dues to the petitioner.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant