Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

V.A.Augustine vs The Assistant Commissioner(Kvat) on 26 December, 2016

Author: K.Vinod Chandran

Bench: K.Vinod Chandran

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT:

           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

     MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2017/22ND PHALGUNA, 1938

                   WP(C).No. 8239 of 2017 (D)
                   ---------------------------


PETITIONER(S):
-------------

            V.A.AUGUSTINE,
            PROPRIETOR,
            M/S SONY RUBBERS,
            RAMAPURAM BAZAR P.O.,
            KOTTAYAM



            BY ADVS.SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR
                   SMT.K.HYMAVATHY

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

     1.    THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(KVAT),
           SPECIAL CIRCLE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,
           KOTTAYAM-686 575

     2.    THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),
           DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,
           KOTTAYAM-686 575

     3.    THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
           DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,
           PALA-686 575


       BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. V.K.SHAMSUDHEEN

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
       ON 13-03-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
       FOLLOWING:

SKG

WP(C).No. 8239 of 2017 (D)
---------------------------

                            APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------


P1   TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY 1ST RESPONDENT
     FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 DATED 26.12.2016

P2   TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY 1ST RESPONDENT
     FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DATED 26.12.2016

P3   TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE
     2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 DATED 04.02.2017

P4   TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE
     2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DATED 04.02.2017

P5   TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER
     BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 DATED
     04.02.2017

P6   TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER
     BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DATED
     04.02.2017

P7   TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE
     KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY ACT ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT FOR
     THE YEAR 2014-15 DATED 04.03.2017

P7   TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE
     KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY ACT ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT FOR
     THE YEAR 2015-16 DATED 04.03.2017



RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------               NIL

                                       /TRUE COPY/



                                      P.S. TO JUDGE
SKG



                        K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J
                         - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                        W.P(C) No.8239 of 2017 D
                        - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                Dated this the 13th day of March, 2017

                              J U D G M E N T

Exts.P1 and P2 is the assessment order passed against the petitioner for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16. Against these orders, petitioner filed Exts.P3 and P4 appeals, which is accompanied by Exts.P5 and P6 stay petitions before the 2nd respondent. Appeal and stay petition are pending before the 2nd respondent. In the meanwhile, coercive proceedings have been initiated. It is in this context, the writ petition has been filed.

2. In the above circumstances, it is directed that the appellate authority, the 2nd respondent herein, consider and dispose of Exts.P5 and P6 stay applications within a period of two WP(C).8239/2017 2 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment and the coercive proceedings be stayed until such orders are passed, which order shall determine the matter thereafter. The consideration is also to be made keeping in mind proviso to Section 55(4) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and condition if at all imposed confined to 20% or less of the tax demanded, at the first appellate stage.

The writ petition is disposed of without any observation on merits and keeping in abeyance the recovery till such time as the directions herein are complied with by the appellate authority, whose orders shall determine the further steps thereafter.

Sd/-

                                       K.VINOD CHANDRAN,
                                             Judge
jma                  //true copy//
                                       P.A to Judge