Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

P.Subramanian vs Indian Overseas Bank on 14 July, 2009

Author: R.S.Ramanathan

Bench: R.S.Ramanathan

       

  

  

 
 
 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 14/07/2009

CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN

Writ Petition No.5950 of 2009
and M.P.No.1 of 2009

1.P.Subramanian

2.S.Savithri			... 	Petitioners

Vs

Indian Overseas Bank
Main Branch,
Dindigul,
Represented by its
Branch Manager			...	Respondent
			
	Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for
the issuance of  writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent Bank to for one time
settlement as per guidelines of the Reserve Bank of India in respect or the loan
A/c.No.580400001 dated 27.09.2004.

!For petitioners ...	Mr.R.Venkatraman
^For respondent  ...	Mr.M.Senthilkumar
	
:ORDER

The petitioner filed this Writ Petition challenging the action of the respondent Bank in bringing the property through auction. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that under the provisions of SARFAESI Act (herein after referred to as "the Act"), he can approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal only if any case is pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal and as per Section 17 of the Act, in the absence of any order, he cannot approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

2. In my opinion, the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner cannot be accepted. Whenever a person is aggrieved by the issuance notice under of Section 13(4) of the Act, it is open to him to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the Act, as Section 17 contemplates an appeal can be preferred against any action taken pursuant to Section 13(4) and it is not stated that only after an order has been passed, the party can file an appeal under Section 17 of the Act. Further there is no need for any proceeding to be pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal for invoking Section 17 of the Act. The remedy available to the petitioner is to file an appeal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the Act and this Court cannot entertain such Writ Petition.

With this observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of. It is open to the petitioner to invoke the provisions of the SARFAESI Act before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

RR To Indian Overseas Bank Main Branch, Dindigul,