Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Rasmi Ranjan Patra @ vs State Of Odisha .... Opposite Party on 7 January, 2026

Author: V. Narasingh

Bench: V. Narasingh

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                       ABLAPL No. 698 of 2025

        Rasmi Ranjan Patra @                ....            Petitioner
        Rashmi Ranjan Patra
                                            Mr. A.P. Das, Advocate
                                 -versus-

        State of Odisha                     ....      Opposite Party
                                             Mr. C. Mohanty, ASC
                                   Mr. P.S. Das, Adv. (Informant)

                      CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
                                   ORDER
Order No.                        07.01.2026
02.   1.      Heard    learned   counsel    for   the   Petitioner,

learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Informant.

2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.950 of 2024 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C.-IV (Cog. Taking), Cuttack, arising out of Govindpur P.S. Case No.256 of 2024 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 9B of the Explosive Substance Act.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that to wriggle out of the accusation on account of the counter case, the present case has been falsely foisted. Hence, the Petitioner may be protected by pre-arrest bail.

Page 1 of 3

4. Learned counsel for the State as well as Informant oppose the prayer for pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned counsel for the State also submits that the Petitioner has criminal antecedents of similar nature.

6. Perused the materials on record.

7. Considering the same, this Court is not inclined to entertain the application for pre-arrest bail. However, it is directed that Petitioner may surrender before the learned J.M.F.C.-IV (Cog. Taking), Cuttack in connection with the aforementioned case within one month from today.

In the event of his surrender and motion for bail, the same be considered by the learned J.M.F.C.- IV (Cog. Taking), Cuttack on merits, in the first hour of the day.

In the event of rejection of the prayer for bail by the learned J.M.F.C.-IV (Cog. Taking), Cuttack, the Petitioner is at liberty to move the higher forum for bail in the second hour on the same day.

8. On being so moved, the higher forum is requested to make an endeavor to dispose of the bail application of the Petitioner on the same day.

The case diary shall be made available to the concerned courts to facilitate disposal of the bail application of the Petitioner and learned J.M.F.C.-IV Page 2 of 3 (Cog. Taking), Cuttack is called upon to transmit the case record to the higher forum at the earliest in the event of rejection of such bail application.

Ground of parity, if any, may be considered by the learned court(s) below.

9. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.

10. U.C.C. as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 09-Jan-2026 10:55:15 Page 3 of 3