Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Subhendu Parichha vs State Of Odisha & Others .... Opp. ... on 12 August, 2022

Author: Biswajit Mohanty

Bench: Biswajit Mohanty

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                            CRLMP No.1501 of 2022

                 Subhendu Parichha                   ....          Petitioner

                                     Mr. B. Tripathy,
                                     Advocate

                                         -versus-
                 State of Odisha & others            ....       Opp. Parties

                                     Mr. D.K. Mohanty,
                                     Additional Standing Counsel

                                  CORAM:
                         JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY
                                      ORDER

Order No. 12.08.2022

01. 1. Heard Mr. B. Tripathy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.K. Mohanty, learned Additional Standing Counsel.

2. According to Mr. Tripathy, the grievance of the petitioner in this case pertains to non-registration of his complaint dated 18.07.2022 under Annexure-1 as F.I.R. by the I.I.C., Riakia Police Station (opposite party No.3) though the same reveals commission of cognizable offences. Despite receipt of complaint under Annexure-1, when nothing was done by opposite party No.3, a copy of the said complaint was sent to the said opposite party by speed post on 20.07.2022. He further submits that the petitioner also sent a grievance petition dated 21.07.2022 to the Superintendent of Police, Kandhamal (opposite party No.2) under Annexure-2 through speed post on the same day. However, till date no action has been taken on the same. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to the Superintendent of Police, Kandhamal to take a decision on the grievance petition of the petitioner within a specific time period.

// 2 //

3. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Superintendent of Police, Kandhamal to take a decision on the grievance petition dated 21.07.2022 of the petitioner under Annexure-2 in accordance with law keeping in mind the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. State of U.P. & Others reported in AIR 2014 SC 187 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, if in the meantime, the same has not been disposed of and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to supply copies of the complaint dated 18.07.2022 under Annexure-1 as well as grievance petition dated 21.07.2022 under Annexure-2 to opposite party No.2 while presenting a certified copy of this order.

4. Accordingly, this CRLMP is disposed of.

5. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

( Biswajit Mohanty) Judge Prasant Page 2 of 2