Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Ulka Seafoods Pvt Ltd Throu. Director ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Throu. Govt ... on 23 July, 2025

Author: Revati Mohite Dere

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere

     NISHA               Digitally signed by NISHA
                         SANDEEP CHITNIS
     SANDEEP             Date: 2025.07.24 16:10:09
     CHITNIS             +0530
                                                                                      10-wp.9844.2025.doc


                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         WRIT PETITION NO.9844 OF 2025

                Ulka Seafoods Pvt. Ltd.
                Through its director
                Raju Gorakh Rohakale                                        ...Petitioner
                     Versus
                The State of Maharashtra and Ors.                           ...Respondents

                Ms. Samiksha J. Patil a/w Mr. Vijay Shinde i/b Shinde & Co., for the
                Petitioner.

                Ms. Tanu N. Bhatia, A.G.P for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3-State.

                None for the Respondent Nos.4 to 8.

                                                      CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
                                                              DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

DATE : 23rd JULY 2025 P.C. :

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to amend the prayer clause. Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out within one week from today and amended copy be served on the other side.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
N. S. Chitnis 1/2 ::: Uploaded on - 24/07/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 02/08/2025 07:50:06 :::

10-wp.9844.2025.doc

3. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 26th August 2025. Learned A.G.P. waives notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3-State and seeks time to take instructions. Hamdast permitted.

4. In addition to Court notice, learned counsel for the petitioner to serve the respondent Nos.4 to 8, by private notice and file affidavit of service before the next date.

5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner to supply spare copies in the Registry, within one week from today, so as to enable the Registry to issue notices to the said respondents.

6. Affidavit-in-replies, if any, to be filed in the Registry, before the next date and advance copy to be served on the other side. DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. N. S. Chitnis 2/2 ::: Uploaded on - 24/07/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 02/08/2025 07:50:06 :::