Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

F. Usman vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 10 December, 2018

Author: S.M.Subramaniam

Bench: S.M.Subramaniam

                                                                 1


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED 10.12.2018

                                                         CORAM

                                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                                W.P.No.25246 of 2005
                                                         and
                                               W.P.M.P.No.27655 of 2005

                          F. USMAN                                                  ...Petitioner


                                                         Vs

                      1.State of Tamil Nadu
                        rep. by its Secretary to Government
                        Commercial Tax Department, Fort St.George,
                         Chennai-9.

                      2. The Commercial Tax Officer,
                        46, Greams Road, Chennai-6.

                      3.The Regional Transport Officer,
                        (South), Chennai.                                           ...Respondents

                      PRAYER : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                      praying to issue a Writ of     Mandamus Directing the 3rd respondent to
                      register    the   imported   car    viz.       Porsche   bearing   Chassis     No.
                      WPOZZZ98Z5U723828 Engine No. 62507785 without demanding Entry
                      Tax Clearance Certificate from the Second Respondent.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                             2



                                   For Petitioner      : No Appearance

                                   For Respondents : Mr.M.Hariharan
                                                      Additional Government Pleader (Taxes)
                                                      for R1 & R2

                                                       Mr.G.B.Rajesh, Government Advocate
                                                         for R3


                                                    ORDER

The writ petition was listed for hearing on 05.12.2018. None appeared for the writ petitioner. Thus, the case was directed to be listed on 06.12.2018 under the caption “For Dismissal”.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing on 06.12.2018, again there is no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner and in order to give one more opportunity to the writ petitioner, it was directed to be listed under the same caption on 10.12.2018.

3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, once again there is no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner. Thus, it is to be construed that the writ petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.

http://www.judis.nic.in 3

4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-

prosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                                   10.12.2018

                      Index      : Yes/No.
                      Internet   : Yes/No.

Speaking order/Non-Speaking Order sk To

1.The Secretary to Government Commercial Tax Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9.

2. The Commercial Tax Officer, 46, Greams Road, Chennai-6.

3.The Regional Transport Officer, (South), Chennai.

http://www.judis.nic.in 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

sk WP No.25246 of 2005 10.12.2018 http://www.judis.nic.in