Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 vs Shri Rakeshbhai K ... on 22 June, 2016

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi, A.J. Shastri

                    O/TAXAP/218/2016                                                ORDER




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                   TAX APPEAL NO. 218 of 2016

         ==========================================================
               PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3,AHMEDABAD....Appellant(s)
                                      Versus
                        SHRI RAKESHBHAI K PATEL....Opponent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR NITIN K MEHTA, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

             CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
                    and
                    HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI

                                         Date : 22/06/2016


                                          ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)   Tax   appeal   is   admitted   for   consideration   of   following  substantial questions of law :

"[A]   Whether   the   Hon'ble   ITAT   has   erred   in   law   and   on  facts     in   directing   the   A0   to   adopt   the   cash   system   of  accounting instead of mercantile system even when in the  block assessment year the system of accounting had been  adopted as mercantile. 
[B] Whether the Hon'ble ITAT has erred in law and on facts  in   dismissing   the   appeal   of   the   revenue   and   thereby  deleting the addition made on account of accrued interest  of Rs 1,44,50,000/­in respect of repurchasing of 850 DDBs  {C] Whether the Hon'ble ITAT has erred in law and on facts  Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Fri Jun 24 02:16:31 IST 2016 O/TAXAP/218/2016 ORDER in   dismissing   the   appeal   of   the   revenue   and   thereby  deleting   the   disallowance   made   on   account   of   denial   of  claim u/s 54EC of the Act in respect of DDBs. 
[D] Whether the Hon'ble ITAT has erred in law and on facts  in   treating   the   capital   gain   of   Rs.   2,21,55,222/­   derived  from   the   sale   of   Deep   Discount   Bonds   as   Long   Term  Capital Gain instead of Short Term Capital Gain as held by  the A0 and allowing deduction u/s 54EC of the Act. 
[E] Whether the Hon'ble ITAT has erred in law and on facts  in   dismissing   the   appeal   of   the   revenue   and   thereby  deleting the addition made on account of accrued interest  of Rs. 48,83,858/­ on holding of DDBs of Nirma Ltd." 

  To be heard with Tax Appeal No.766/2013.

(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (A.J. SHASTRI, J.) raghu Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Fri Jun 24 02:16:31 IST 2016