Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Ravi vs The State Of Tamilnadu on 6 December, 2022

Bench: P.N.Prakash, N.Anand Venkatesh

                                                                                 H.C.P.No.1206 of 2022

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 06..12..2022

                                                        Coram

                                       The Honourable Mr. Justice P.N.PRAKASH
                                                           and
                                   The Honourable Mr. Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                        Habeas Corpus Petition No.1206 of 2022
                     Ravi
                                                                                  ..... Petitioner
                                                        -Versus-
                     1.The State of Tamilnadu,
                       Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government,
                       Home, Prohibition & Excise Department,
                       Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

                     2.The District Collector and District Magistrate,
                       Tiruvarur District, Tiruvarur.

                     3.The Superintendent of Police,
                       Tiruvarur District, Tiruvarur.

                     4.The Inspector of Police,
                       Arivalam Police Station,
                       Tiruvarur.

                     5.The Superintendent of Prison,
                       Tiruchirappalli.
                                                                                 .... Respondents




                     Page 1 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                        H.C.P.No.1206 of 2022

                                  Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a
                     Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records relating to the detention order
                     dated 09.05.2022 passed by the second respondent in C.O.C.No.08/2022
                     detaining Muthu @ Pallumuthu, Son of Ravi, the petitioner herein, under
                     Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 as a Goonda, and to quash
                     the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the
                     petitioner's son , now, confined in Central Prison, Tiruchirappalli, before
                     this court and set him at liberty.


                                           For Petitioner       : Mr.O.S.Thilak Pasumbadiyar

                                           For Respondents      : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj,
                                                                  Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                              ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH.J.,] The petitioner is the father of the detenu viz., Muthu @ Pallumuthu, aged 25 years. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by his order in C.O.C.No.08/2022 dated 09.05.2022 holding him to be a "Goonda", as contemplated under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition.

Page 2 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.1206 of 2022

2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority.

3. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner has raised several other grounds to assail the order of detention, he has mainly focused on the ground that the arrest intimation has not been properly translated in vernacular language. This deprived the detenu from making effective representation. Therefore, on this ground, the detention order is liable to be quashed.

4. On consideration of the submissions made on either side and upon perusal of the documents available on record, especially, Page No.117 of the booklet, it is clear that the arrest intimation has not been properly translated in vernacular language. Thus the impugned detention order is liable to be set aside on this ground.

Page 3 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.1206 of 2022 In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in C.O.C.No.08/2022 dated 09.05.2022 passed by the second respondent is set aside. The detenu viz., Muthu @ Pallumuthu, is directed to be released forthwith unless his detention is required in connection with any other case.

                                                                       (P.N.P., J.)     (N.A.V.,J.)
                                                                             06..12..2022
                     Index: Yes/No
                     kmk




                     Page 4 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.1206 of 2022 To

1.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition & Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Tiruvarur District, Tiruvarur.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvarur District, Tiruvarur.

4.The Inspector of Police, Arivalam Police Station, Tiruvarur.

5.The Superintendent of Prison, Tiruchirapalli.

6.The Joint Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Public, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

7.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Page 5 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.1206 of 2022 P.N.PRAKASH.J., AND N.ANAND VENKATESH.J., kmk H.C.P.No.1206 of 2022

06..12..2022 Page 6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis