Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr. Vishwas S. Bhamburkar vs Indira Institute Of Management ,Pune on 21 July, 2009

                    CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                        Club Building, Old JNU Campus,
                      Opposite Ber Sarai, New Delhi 110 067.
                              Tel: +91 11 26161796

                                                    Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2009/001456/4204
                                                           Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2009/001456

Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal:

Appellant                            :      Mr. Vishwas S. Bhamburkar
                                            B-72, Satellite Center , Vastrapur
                                            Ahmedabad-380015

Respondent                           :      Mrs. Tarita Hehendale
                                            Public Information Officer
                                            Indira Institute of Management ,Pune,
                                            "Tapasya", 85/5-A,
                                            New Pune- Mumbai Highway,
                                            Tathawade, Pune-411033.

RTI application filed on             :      26/02/2009
PIO replied                          :      No mentioned
First Appeal filed on                :      06/04/2009
First Appellate Authority order      :      21/04/2009
Second Appeal filed on               :      09/06/2009


Information sought

by the Appellant:

1. Please let me know which buildings are used by Indira Institute of Management studies , Pune (IIPM) for the MBA and MCA program of the University of Pune for which u have also got the accreditation by the National Board of Accreditation.
2. Please provide me photocopy of the detailed building plan with the stamp of approval and the building use permission provided by the competent authority.
3. I be informed of details if any , of other entities functioning from the same premises that have been clearly earmarked for IIPM , including but not limited to chairman's office of shree Chanakya Education Society
4. Please provide me the name of the members of the governing council of IIPM.would like to have also there addresses, a brief resume and their profession.
5. Please provide me the political affiliation of the member of the governing council and whether any of them hold public office, wether corporate MLA,MLC,MP etc . Or are Public servants.
6. Please provide me with the detail of the basis of selection and or nomination of the member of the governing council.

PIO'S reply:

Not mentioned.
Grounds for First Appeal:
No reply by the PIO Order of the First Appellate Authority:
In the light of the same your Aforesaid letter as well as the Application under right to information act 2005 dated 26th Feb. 2009 received by this office on 4th March 2009 and also your application dated 27th feb,2009 which is never received by the organization can not be entertained at this juncture.
Grounds for Second Appeal:
Unsatisfactory and incomplete information.
Relevant facts emerging during hearing: The following were present:
Appellant: Mr. Vishwas S. Bhamburkar Respondent: Mr. Manoj on behalf of PIO Mrs. Tarita Hehendale Mr. Manoj states that, "he accepts that they are the public authority". However he points out that the college is affiliated to Pune University and hence the jurisdiction over this appeal lies with the State Information Commission of Maharashtra. The contention of the Respondent is correct and the Appellant was asked if he had any argument in this matter, the Appellant agrees.
Decision:
The Appeal is dismissed.
The Commission has no jurisdiction over this appeal.
This decision is announced in open chamber. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
Shailesh Gandhi Information Commissioner 21 July 2009 (In any case correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.) (R.K)