Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Madan Lal vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 11 April, 2016

Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, C. Nagappan

     ITEM NO.41                               COURT NO.3                  SECTION II
                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F       I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 9167/2013
     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30/01/2013
     in CRLR No. 121/2011 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New
     Delhi)

     MADAN LAL                                                             Petitioner(s)
                                     VERSUS
     STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS                                            Respondent(s)
     (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T.)

     Date : 11/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN

     For Petitioner(s)                  Mr.   Pankaj Sinha, Adv.
                                        Ms.   Nidhi Parashar, Adv.
                                        Ms.   Charu Ambani, Adv.
                                        for   Mr. Navin Chawla,AOR

     For Respondent(s)                  Mrs. K. Sarada Devi,Adv.

                                         Dr. R. R. Deshpande,Adv.

                                        Dr. Abhishek Atrey, Adv.
                                        Ms. Sadhna Sandhu, Adv.
                                        for Mr. D. S. Mahra,AOR

                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                  O R D E R

Since respondent no.3 is now represented through Mrs. K. Sarada Devi, Advocate, after getting 'No Objection Certificate' from the erstwhile counsel Mr. R.R.Deshpande, he is being discharged from representing respondent no.3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that it is not essential to file any rejoinder affidavit in this case. Signature Not Verified

In view of the above, pleadings are complete. Digitally signed by PARVEEN KUMAR Date: 2016.04.13 16:26:43 IST Reason: Post for hearing after four weeks.

     (Renuka Sadana)                                                     (Parveen Kumar)
      Court Master                                                          AR-cum-PS