Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Johnson P.John vs Mr. D.Manivannan on 16 October, 2015

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT:

     THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR
                                  &
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN

       THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/14TH ASWINA, 1938

        Con.Case(C).No. 809 of 2016 (S)  IN OP (CAT).69/2015
        -----------------------------------------------------

  AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP (CAT) 69/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
                          DATED 16-10-2015

PETITIONER(S):
-------------

            JOHNSON P.JOHN
            AGED;54 YEARS, S/O (LATE) SHRI. KOSHY YOHANNAN,
            (EX) PGT-PHYSICS, GOSPEL MOUNT, KAKANNI, DHONI PO,
            PALAKKAD, KERALA  STATE-678009


            BY SRI JOHNSON P.JOHN(PARTY IN PERSON)

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

          1. MR. D.MANIVANNAN
            (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
            DY. COMMISSIONER, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN,
            REGIONAL OFFICE, SECUNDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE-500009

          2. MR. SANTHOSH KUMAR MALL
            AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
            DY. COMMISSIONER, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGTHAN,
            18,INSUTITUTIONAL AREA, S J SINGH MARG,
            NEW DELHI- 110016

          3. MRS. RAMA DEVI
            AGED AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
            PRINCIPAL, KV NO. 1, UPPAL, HYDERABAD,
            TELANGANA STATE-500039

          4. MR. S.M. SALEEM
            AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
            (EX) DY. COMMISSIONER, C/O K V S (R.O)
            SECUNDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE-500009 PRESENTLY WOKING AS
            DY. COMMISSIONER, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SNAGATHAN,
            (REGIONAL OFFICE), IIT CAMPUS, CHENNAI,
            TAMIL NADU-600036

            R1 -R 4  BY ADV. SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER, SC, KENDRIYA
                             VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN
                        ADV.SRI.V.V.ASHOKAN (SENIOR)
                        SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SRI.V.TEKCHAND

       THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL)  HAVING BEEN FINALLY
HEARD  ON  06-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:

C.O.(C).No. 809 of 20156
---------------------------

                             APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES
-----------------------
ANNEXURE A1      CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.10.2015 IN
                 OP(CAT) 69/2015.

ANNEXURE A2      TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18.10.2015
                 ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A3      CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 07.12.2015 IN RP
                 1144/2015.

ANNEXURE A4      TRUE COPY OF THE 2ND REMINDER LETTER DATED
                 18.12.2015 ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A5      TRUE COPY OF LETTER BEARING FILE NO.F.13-GEN/KVS-
                 HR/2013-14/A&A/4001-4006.

ANNEXURE A6      TRUE COPY OF GPF ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR 2012-2013 IN
                 RESPECT OF A/C NO.78382.

ANNEXURE A7      TRUE COPY OF LETTER WITH REF. NO.F.PF(JPJ)PGT
                 (Phys)/KV1UPPAL/2012-13/270.

ANNEXURE A8      TRUE COPY OF GPF ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR 2013-14 IN
                 RESPECT OF A/C NO.78383.

ANNEXURE A9      TRUE COPY OF LETTER BEARING NO.F.JPJ/KV1(U)/2015-
                 16/257.

ANNEXURE A10     TRUE COPY OF GPF ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR 2014-15 IN
                 RESPECT OF A/C NO.78382.

ANNEXURE A11     TRUE COPY OF PAGES 1,5,6&7 OF THE ADDITIONAL
                 AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE DY.COMMISSIONER ON BEHALF OF
                 KVS RESPONDENTS THEREIN IN CP(C) 23/2013 IN O.A
                 457/2011 WITHOUT ANNEXURES.

ANNEXURE A12     TRUE COPY OF OFFICER ORDER BEARING FILE NO.F.13-
                 GEN/KVS-HR/2016-17/A&A/5546.

ANNEXURE A13     TRUE COPY OF LETTER BY REGISTERED POST ADDRESSED TO
                 THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A14     TRUE COPY OF LETTER BY REGISTERED POST ADDRESSED TO
                 THE 1ST RESPONDENT.



RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES
-----------------------

ANNEXURE A       TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.31069/12/2016-KVS(L&C)
                 MISC.

ANNEXURE B       TRUE COPY OF THE PENSION SANCTION ORDER NO.11-24
                 (741)/2016-17/KVS(HR)A&A/13763-65.

ANNEXURE C       TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUTATION ORDER NO.11-24(741)/
                 2016-17/KVS(HR)A&A/13764.
                                                          /...2/

C.O.(C).No. 809 of 20156
---------------------------

ANNEXURE D       TRUE COPY OF THE GPF FINAL PAYMENT SANCTION ORDER
                 NO.F.13-GEN/KVS(HR)2016-17/A&A/13756.

ANNEXURE E       TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT NO.142726.

ANNEXURE F       TRUE COPY OF THE FRESH STATEMENT OF INTEREST
                 PAYMENT FOR VARIOUS SPELLS ON ACCOUNT OF FINAL GPF
                 PAYMENT.

ANNEXURE G       TRUE COPY OF THE FRESH STATEMENT OF INTEREST
                 CALCULATION FOR VARIOUS SPELLS ON ACCOUNT OF
                 GRATUITY PAYMENT.

ANNEXURE H       TRUE COPY OF THE CALCULATION STATEMENT OF INTEREST
                 FROM 01.12.2012 TO 31.08.2016.

ANNEXURE I       TRUE COPY OF THE REVISED PENSION SANCTION ORDER.



                                          TRUE COPY

                                        P.A TO JUDGE
vdv



        Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, C.J. & Sathish Ninan, J
       ===============================
                        C.O.(C) No.809 of 2016
             ==========================
               Dated this the 6th day of October, 2016


                             JUDGMENT

Mohan M.Shantanagoudar, C.J.

Heard party in person and senior counsel appearing for the first respondent.

2. During the course of hearing, the complainant drew our attention to the additional affidavit filed by the first respondent on 30.09.2016. Annexure I document dated 27.09.2016, produced along with the additional affidavit, clearly reveals that the revised retirement pension of the complainant is fixed at 13,915/- plus DR(Dearness Relief) and that he is entitled to the same with effect from 01.12.2012. It is made clear in the said document that the Bank is authorised to calculate interest on pension arrears payable to the pensioner for the period from 01.12.2012 to 31.08.2016 following interest rates as are applicable for GPF as specified in the very same document. Family pension is also ordered to be paid as per the sanction C.O.(C) No.809/2016 2 order. It is also made clear in the said document that the pensioner is entitled to fixed medical allowance of 300/- per month from 01.12.2012 to 18.11.2014 and thereafter at 500/- per month with the condition that he is not availing any medical facility from any other source.

3. The complainant is satisfied with the additional affidavit filed by the first respondent. However, his only grievance is that the interest on arrears of pension is calculated only up to 31.08.2016 and not subsequently. Such submission cannot be accepted. Matter is pending before this Court since one year. Moreover, Annexure I is dated 27.09.2016 and therefore, this Court can call on the first respondent to calculate the interest only up to 31.08.2016 i.e., the end of the previous month.

4. It is further brought to the notice of this Court by the Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the first respondent that the entire amounts due to the complainant are already deposited in the State Bank of India and the State Bank of India C.O.(C) No.809/2016 3 generally takes one month's time to disburse the amount to the complainant as is being done in respect of other employees.

5. Having regard to the aforementioned submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, we are satisfied that an order has already been passed by the first respondent and pursuant to such order, the entire pensionary benefits due to the complainant is deposited by the first respondent in the bank to be disbursed to the complainant. In view of the same, we do not propose to continue the contempt proceedings.

Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed with the above observations.

Sd/-

MohanChief M.Shantanagoudar, Justice.

Sd/-

Sathish Ninan, Judge vdv/06/10/16