Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Oil Khad Surakha Somity vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 27 September, 2023

Author: Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Bench: Sanjay Kumar Medhi

                                                                     Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010016472016




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                Case No. : WP(C)/3132/2016

            OIL KHAD SURAKHA SOMITY
            HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT TENGKHAT, P.O. WILLTON, DISBRUGARH,
            ASSAM, PIN-786101, REP. BY ITS ASSTT. GENERAL SECY. SRI MONOJ
            PATHAK, S/O LT. MOHAN PATHAK, R/O NO.2 MOUMARI GAON, P.O.
            KATHALGURI, DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM


            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM and 2 ORS.
            REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPTT.
            OF HOME , DISPUR, GHY-6

            2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ASSAM POLICE HQ
             ULUBARI
             GHY-7

            3:OIL INDIA LTD.

             DULIAJAN
             ASSAM
             PIN-78602
             REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGE

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MRU SARMA

Advocate for the Respondent : MR.A SARMAR-3
                                                                             Page No.# 2/2


                                  BEFORE
                 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

                                        ORDER

27-09-2023 Vide order dated 17.08.2023 passed in IA(C) No. 1796/2023, the prayer for impleadment of two new parties as respondent nos. 4 & 5 was allowed. It is submitted that the amended cause title has been filed today.

List after a week.

The learned counsel for the petitioner is also directed to serve extra copies of the writ petition with corrected cause title upon Shri T. C. Chutia, learned State Counsel, Ms. K. Phukan, learned CGC and Shri L. Sangtam for Oil India Ltd.

The aforesaid names of the learned counsel for the respondents may be reflected in the cause list.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant