Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi

Devinder Pal Singh Kohli, New Delhi vs Acit, New Delhi on 21 June, 2017

                                                                         1



             IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                 [ DELHI BENCHES: "B" NEW DELHI ]


           BEFORE SHRI I. C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER
           AND SHRI L. P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                I.T. Appeal Nos. 1665 & 1666/Del/2014
                Assessment Years : 2008-09 & 2009-10

Shri Devinder Pal Singh Kohli,                     Asstt. Commissioner
C/o. Shri Rakesh Chadha, C. A.;          Vs.       of Income Tax,
E-95/2, Naraina Vihar,                             Circle : 11,
N e w D e l h i - 110 028.                         New Delhi.
  PAN : APRPK 9704 M
      (Appellant)                                       (Respondent)


                          Assessee by : N O N E;

           Department by : Shri Anil Kumar Sharma, Sr. D. R.

                     Date of Hearing : 02.05.2017

                Date of Pronouncement :        21.06.2017

                               O R D E R.
PER I. C. SUDHIR, J. M. :


     Both the above appeals have been preferred by the assessee. These

were time barred and applications for condonation of delay along with

affidavits were filed.   These appeals were first listed for hearing on

05.04.2016 on which date the same were adjourned to 26.07.2016 due

to non-functioning of the Bench. On 26.07.2016, nobody appeared on

behalf of the assessee and both the appeals were adjourned to
                                                                         2



07.11.2016 with a direction to the Registry that "Issue Notice by RPAD.

On 07.11.2016 both the cases were adjourned to 06.02.2017.            On

07.11.2016 and 06.02.2017 as the Bench did not function, both the

appeals were adjourned to 02.05.2017 and the notice fixing the date was

issued by Speed Post.


2.     Notice of hearing for 02.05.2017 was sent to the assessee by

Post on 28.03.2017 at the address mentioned in Form No. 36 vide

Column No. 10 which has been returned back by the postal authority

with the remark "Refused". It is, thus, inferred that the assessee is not

interested in prosecution of his appeals, therefore, in our considered

opinion, no useful purpose would be served to send the notice again and

again on the same address. These appeals are accordingly dismissed in

default, for non-prosecution.


3.   The order is pronounced in the Open Court on : 21 st June, 2017.


         Sd/-                                             Sd/-
   ( L. P. SAHU )                                  ( I. C. SUDHIR )
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                 JUDICIAL MEMBER




Dated : the 21st June, 2017.


*MEHTA*
                                                                    3




Copy of the Order forwarded to :-
1. Appellant;

2. Respondent;

3. CIT;

4. CIT (Appeals);

5. DR, ITAT, ND.
                                                    BY ORDER


ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Date Draft dictated on 21.06.2017 Draft placed before author 21.06.2017 Draft proposed & placed before the second member Draft discussed/approved by Second Member.

Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Kept for pronouncement on File sent to the Bench Clerk Date on which file goes to the AR Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk.

Date of dispatch of Order.

4