Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Kallavva W/O Gadigeppa Begur vs Dr Mahesh on 29 October, 2025

Author: S G Pandit

Bench: S G Pandit

                                                       -1-
                                                             NC: 2025:KHC-D:14537-DB
                                                             CCC No. 100332 of 2025


                        HC-KAR



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
                            DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025
                                            PRESENT
                                 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT
                                                AND
                                 THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.
                              CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100332 OF 2025
                       BETWEEN:
                            SMT. KALLAVVA W/O GADIGEPPA BEGUR
                            [DAUGHTER OF SHIVAPPA ANGADI],
                            AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
                            R/O TARIHAL VILLAGE, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD.
                                                                 ...COMPLAINANT
                       (BY SRI. UDAYASHANKAR SHINDHE, ADVOCATE)
                       AND:
                       1.   DR. MAHESH
                            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
                            KIADB, BENGALURU 01.
                       2.   SRI. S.K. BHANDHARI, KAS.,
                            SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KIADB,
                            KANIJA BHAVAN, BENGALURU 560001.
                                                                      ...ACCUSED
                       3.   THE CHIEF SECRETARY,
                            GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
VISHAL
NINGAPPA                    M.S. BUILDING, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.
PATTIHAL
Digitally signed by
VISHAL NINGAPPA
PATTIHAL
                                                      ...PROFORMA RESPONDENT
                       (BY SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR PROFORMA RESPONDENT)
Location: HIGH COURT
OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH




                             THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
                       CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION
                       OF INDIA,1950, PRAYING TO KINDLY INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
                       ISSUING DIRECTIONS TO RESPONDETN-1 & 2 UNDER CONTEMPT
                       PROCEEDINGS TO DISBERSE THE 1/4TH TO PETITIONER AND TO EACH OF
                       THE LR'S OF THE DEAD SHIVAPPA K ANGADI IN THE TOTAL 1/6TH SHARE
                       IN TOTAL COMPENSATION AWARDED IN TERMS ORDER PASSED BY THE
                       LEARNED 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE HUBBALLI DATED 22-06-
                       2023 IN FDP 31/2021 AT ANNEXURE-F TO ENABLE TO DISBURSE THE
                       COMPENSATION AVAILABLE IB THE OFFICE OF RESPONDANT-11 AS PER
                       ANNEXURE-K & ETC.
                               -2-
                                      NC: 2025:KHC-D:14537-DB
                                      CCC No. 100332 of 2025


HC-KAR



    THIS   CCC   COMING   ON   FOR       ORDERS,   THIS   DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT
            AND
            THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.

                         ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) This contempt petition is filed under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India alleging violation of order dated 22.06.2023 passed in FDP No.31/2021 on the file of learned I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Hubballi.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the complainant and perused the entire contempt petition papers.

3. Learned counsel for the complainant would submit that under order dated 22.06.2023 passed in FDP No.31/2021 on the file of learned I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Hubballi, in respect of Schedule A & B properties, the petitioner and respondents No.3 to 6 each are entitled to 1/6th share out of compensation awarded by KIADB. He submits that the order would declare that the legal representatives of the respondent No.1 Shivappa shall be equally entitled to 1/6th share of respondent No.1 in the said compensation amount. Learned counsel would submit that the complainant/respondent No.9 would be entitled for equal share among legal representatives of respondent No.1 Shivappa.

-3-

NC: 2025:KHC-D:14537-DB CCC No. 100332 of 2025 HC-KAR

4. There is no specific direction to pay any compensation to respondent No.9/complainant herein. The complainant/respondent No.9 has to claim his share by establishing that respondent No.9 is also legal representative of respondent No.1 Shivappa in the said FDP proceedings. Moreover, KIADB is not a party to the proceedings in FDP No.31/2021. The settlement, if any, in FDP No.31/2021 is between the parties to the said FDP proceedings.

5. Therefore, in the above circumstances, it cannot be said that the respondents/accused have violated the order dated 22.06.2023 passed in FDP No.31/2021. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands rejected.

Sd/-

(S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/-

(GEETHA K.B.) JUDGE JTR, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 7