Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 4]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Lilu Ram & Ors vs Sumit Kumar Land Acquisition Collector ... on 25 August, 2017

Bench: Rajesh Bindal, Gurvinder Singh Gill

COCP No.1821 of 2017 (O&M)                                                --1--

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                          AT CHANDIGARH

                                         COCP No.1821 of 2017 (O&M)
                                         Date of Decision:-August 25, 2017

Lilu Ram and others
                                                            ......Petitioners

                                 Versus

Sh. Sumit Kumar, Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate Haryana,
Hisar and others
                                                 ......Respondents


CORAM:       Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
             Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill

Present :    None for the petitioners.

             Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl.A.G. Haryana.

             ******

Rajesh Bindal J:

The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners whose land was acquired by the State. The grievance raised is that in terms of the award of the reference Court, which was subsequently modified by this Court and the amount of compensation was enhanced, the amount was not being paid, though there was direction by the reference Court to pay the amount within one month from the date of award of the reference Court. Alleging violation thereof, the petitioners have filed the present contempt petition. It is not in dispute that the petitioners have already filed execution of the award, which is still pending before the Court below, still contempt jurisdiction has been invoked.
There had been lot of acquisition of land in the State. The issue was raised by the land owners regarding non-payment of compensation.




                                      1 of 3
                   ::: Downloaded on - 08-09-2017 23:21:03 :::
 COCP No.1821 of 2017 (O&M)                                               --2--

Number of writ petitions were filed in this Court. In CWP No.727 of 2017-

M/S Daulatram-Dharambir Auto Pvt. Ltd. V/S State of Haryana and others, the matter was taken up by this Court and is being monitered to ensure that all the land owners in the State, whose land has been acquired for use by the Urban Estates Department, are paid the compensation.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the State that priority list has been prepared in order of seniority i.e. firstly award of the Collector, then award of the reference Court thereafter the amount, if any, enhanced by the High Court and Hon'ble the Supreme Court. Priority list has been prepared considering the time when the acquisition was carried out. Approximate liability on account of compensation payable by the State to different land owners was stated to be about ` 15,000/- crores. After the aforesaid writ petition was taken up on 2.6.2017 and is being monitored by the Court, out of the aforesaid amount, a sum of ` 4,043/- crores has already been paid to the land owners and the priority list for payment of another ` 3,800/- crores has been uploaded on the website of Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA). Out of this ` 3,200/- crores are available with HUDA. Further arrangements are also being made.

Considering the aforesaid facts, we do not find any good ground to continue with this contempt petition, the same is accordingly dismissed.

Learned counsel for the State submitted that, he will sensitise the officers to apprise all the land owners, whose compensation has not been paid that priority list for payment of compensation has been uploaded on the website of HUDA. Further in case their names are not reflected therein though they have a claim which is admissible prior to the persons mentioned 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 08-09-2017 23:21:04 ::: COCP No.1821 of 2017 (O&M) --3--

in the list, to which authority they have to approach. He further submitted that a request shall be made to the Director, Development and Panchayat, to flash this message to the land owners through Gram Panchayats at the village level.




                                                       ( Rajesh Bindal )
                                                            Judge



August 25, 2017                                    ( Gurvinder Singh Gill )
pankaj                                                      Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned                 Yes/No

Whether reportable                        Yes/No




                                        3 of 3
                     ::: Downloaded on - 08-09-2017 23:21:04 :::