Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

The Asadkhan Co-Operative vs The Deputy Registrar Of on 7 November, 2024

                                                -1-
                                                             NC: 2024:KHC-D:16311
                                                         WP No. 108755 of 2016




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                        DHARWAD BENCH

                           DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

                                              BEFORE

                            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

                           WRIT PETITION NO.108755 OF 2016 (CS-RES)

                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   THE ASADKHAN CO-OPERATIVE
                        HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED, BELAGAVI,
                        RPTD BY ITS CHAIRMAN
                        SHRI IBRAHIM @ NAUHSHAD
                        KAMARUDDIN SHEIKH, AGE: 45 YEARS,
                        R/O: MUJAWAR GALLI, BELAGAVI - 590 001.

                   2.   THE ASADKHAN CO - OPERATIVE,
                        HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED,
                        RPTD BY ITS SECRETARY,
                        SHRI ABDULKHADAR I. SOUDAGAR
                        AGE: 52 YEARS, R/O: NO.288,
Digitally signed
by SAROJA
HANGARAKI
                        MUJAWAR GALLI, BELAGAVI - 590 001.
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
                                                                    ...PETITIONERS

                   (BY SRI F. V. PATIL, SRI NANDISH PATIL, ADVOCATES)

                   AND:

                   1.   THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF
                        CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
                        BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI,
                        COURT COMPOUND, BELGAUM.
                        BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
                                   -2-
                                             NC: 2024:KHC-D:16311
                                           WP No. 108755 of 2016




2.   THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF
     CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, BELAGAVI,
     DIST: BELAGAVI, COURT COMPOUND,
     BELAGAVI,
     BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI.

                                                   ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2)

      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE OF WRIT IN

NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTICE

DATED    30.06.2016     VIDE   ANNEXURE-F     BRG.NO.AR-9/RSR/13/

2012-13, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2. ISSUE OF WRIT IN

NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTICE

DATED    24.05.2016    VIDE    ANNEXURE-F1    BRG.NO.AR-9/RSR/13/

2012-13, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2. ISSUE OF WRIT IN

NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTICE

DATED    06.10.2016     VIDE   ANNEXURE-BRG.     NO.   DRL/   ABN/

ASADKHAN/2016-17, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AND ETC.,


      THIS    WRIT    PETITION,   COMING    ON   FOR   PRELIMINARY

HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS

UNDER:


CORAM:       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
                                   -3-
                                                 NC: 2024:KHC-D:16311
                                               WP No. 108755 of 2016




                           ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA) The present writ petition is filed seeking for the following reliefs:

"A) Issue of Writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the impugned notice dated 30.06.2016 vide Annexure-F brg.No.AR-9/RSR/13/2012-13, issued by the respondent No.2, in the interest of justice and equity;
B) Issue of Writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the impugned notice dated 24.05.2016 vide Annexure-F1 brg.No.AR-9/RSR/13/2012-13, issued by the respondent No.2, in the interest of justice and equity;
C) Issue of Writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the impugned notice dated 06.10.2016 vide Annexure-G brg.No.DRL/ABN/ASADKHAN/ 2016-17, issued by the respondent No.1, in the interest of justice and equity; D) Issue such other suitable order/s or directions as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the nature and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."

2. It is forthcoming that the petitioners were issued notices for initiating criminal action against them in view -4- NC: 2024:KHC-D:16311 WP No. 108755 of 2016 of petitioners not having produced the records as sought for by the official respondents. It is the case of the petitioners that the records are in the custody of the police authorities in Crime No.187/2012.

3. The learned AGA submits that Criminal Case No.478/2013, which was registered pursuant to Crime No.187/2012 has been disposed off by the Court of the JMFC- IV, Belgaum by judgment dated 21.05.2014.

4. Further, it is brought to the notice of this Court that a similar writ petition filed by the petitioners in W.P.No.80895/2013 & 81909/2013 has been disposed off by this Court vide order dated 05.06.2015.

5. In view of the fact that the records that were required by the officials of the respondents were in the custody of the police authorities, the question of any coercive action being issued against the petitioners regarding non-production of requisite records does not arise. However, since the criminal proceedings have been disposed off, it would be open for the official respondents to issue notice to the petitioners calling -5- NC: 2024:KHC-D:16311 WP No. 108755 of 2016 upon them to produce required documents in accordance with law.

6. Hence, the following:

ORDER
i) The writ petition is allowed.
ii) The impugned notices bearing Nos.AR-9/RSR/ 13/2012-13 dated 30.06.2016 (Annexure-F) issued by respondent No.2, AR-9/RSR/13/ 2012-13 dated 24.05.2016 (Annexure-F1) issued by respondent No.2, and DRL/ABN/ ASADKHAN/2016-17 dated 06.10.2016 (Annexure-G) issued by respondent No.1 are quashed.
iii) Liberty is reserved to the official respondents to initiate such other proceedings as permissible under law.

Sd/-

(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE YAN, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50