Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Rajsekhar B.Korwar vs Union Of India on 14 July, 2014

Bench: N. Paul Vasanthakumar, K.Ravichandrabaabu

       

  

  

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.07.2014

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

WRIT PETITION Nos.21377 & 21378 OF 2013
& M.P.Nos.2 and 3 of 2010 in both WPs.


Rajsekhar B.Korwar				... Petitioner in W.P.No.
							    21377 of 2010

Kaleem Khan					... Petitioner in W.P.No.
							    21378 of 2010

					Vs.

1.	Union of India
	rep. by its Secretary
	Ministry of Home Affairs
	New Delhi.

2.	The Director General
	Central Industrial Security Force
	CGO Complex, New Delhi.

3.	The Deputy Inspector General (Personal)
	Central Industrial Security  Force
	CGO Complex, New Delhi.

4.	The Deputy Inspector General
	CISF, Ministry of Home Affairs
	D Block Rajaji Salai
	Besant Nagar
	Chennai - 600 090.

5.	The Senior Commandant
	Central Industrial Security Force
	4th NDRF BN, Arakkonam.		... Respondents in both
							    WPs.
	
	Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in No.E.38023/4 Bn.NDRF(A)Adm.I/2010-1693, dated 1st March, 2010 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same insofar as the petitioners are concerned as illegal, mechanical, arbitrary against the principles of natural justice and unsustainable in law and consequently direct the respondents to accept the applications of the petitioners and permit them to participate in tests as may be fixed by the respondents.


	For Petitioners	: Mr.M.Arvind Kumar
	For Respondents	: Ms.Sangamithirai
COMMON ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N.Paul Vasanthakumar, J.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. These writ petitions are filed to quash the order dated 1.3.2010 insofar as the petitioners are concerned as illegal, mechanical, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and unsustainable in law and consequently direct the respondents to accept the applications of the petitioners and permit them to participate in tests for promotion as Sub Inspector (Executive) in CISF through Limited Department Competitive Examination for the year 2010, as may be fixed by the respondents.

3. The impugned orders were issued disqualifying the petitioners to participate in the tests on the ground that they were issued with an order of censure on 16.2.2004 in W.P.No.21377 of 2010 and on 27.7.2003 insofar as the petitioner in W.P.No.21378 of 2010.

4. The grievance of the petitioners is that as per Rules, four years prior to the application only, the good ACR with unblemished records has to be shown with further direction to show the unblemished record till issue of offer of appointment. The petitioners having applied pursuant to the application dated 18.1.2010 and they having suffered with punishment of censure, which was awarded long prior to four years, before the date of inviting applications, rejecting their applications on the basis of censure awarded on 16.2.2004 and 27.7.2003 respectively, is improper.

5. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court, the petitioners were permitted to appear for the written examination and both the petitioners have failed in the written examination Paper-I and they were found not eligible for selection.

6. Having regard to the fact that the petitioners have failed in the written examination, no relief could be ordered in these writ petitions except to state that the respondents shall consider their applications strictly in accordance with the guidelines/rules, which are in force on the relevant date of notification for future promotion.

These writ petitions are disposed of with the above observation. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Index		: Yes/No			 (N.P.V., J.)     (K.R.C.B.,  J.)
Internet	: Yes/No				    14.07.2014
kb





To

1.	Union of India
	rep. by its Secretary
	Ministry of Home Affairs
	New Delhi.

2.	The Director General
	Central Industrial Security Force
	CGO Complex, New Delhi.

3.	The Deputy Inspector General (Personal)
	Central Industrial Security  Force
	CGO Complex, New Delhi.

4.	The Deputy Inspector General
	CISF, Ministry of Home Affairs
	D Block Rajaji Salai
	Besant Nagar
	Chennai - 600 090.

5.	The Senior Commandant
	Central Industrial Security Force
	4th NDRF BN, Arakkonam.








						   N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR,J.
						   AND
						   K. RAVICHANDRABAABU, J.
											kb
















							   W.P.NOs.21377 & 21378
								of 2010










								14.07.2014