Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

K.I.Ramesan vs State Of Kerala on 10 August, 2015

Author: B.Kemal Pasha

Bench: B.Kemal Pasha

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                                     PRESENT:

                         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA

                THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/9TH ASWINA, 1937

                                            Crl.MC.No. 6132 of 2015
                                               ---------------------------
    CC 226/2015 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, NEDUMKANDOM.
                                                       ............

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:
-------------------------------------

        1. K.I.RAMESAN, AGED 47 YEARS,
            S/O. KRISHNAN, INIKUKNNIL (HOUSE), KOMBAYAR,
            PARATHODU VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

        2. LIJU, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O. VARGHESE,
            ELANGIKODE (HOUSE), VASUKUTTAN PARA,
            KOMBAYAR, PARATHODU VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

        3. ANEESH, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O. VARGHESE,
            CHERIVU KALAYIL (HOUSE), MUNDIYERUMA,
            PARATHODU VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

        4. THOMAS @ KUNJUMON, AGED 51 YEARS,
            S/O. THOMAS, ELLUKALAYIL (HOUSE), VASUKUTTAN PARA,
            KOMBAYAR, PARATHODU VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

        5. SANTHOSH KUMAR, AGED 51 YEARS,
            S/O. PRABHAKARAN, PUNNAKKAL (HOUSE),
            KOMBAYAR, PARATHODU VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.


            BY ADV. SMT.G.VIDYA

RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT:
----------------------------------------------

        1. STATE OF KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

        2. S. MANOJ, AGED 41 YEARS,
            S/O. SREDHARAN, MATHILITTA THARAYIL (HOUSE),
            KOMBAYAR, PARATHODU, UDUMBANCHOLA P.O.,
            IDUKKI DISTIRCT, PIN-685554.


            R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE
            R2 BY ADV. SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE


            THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
            ON 01-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
            FOLLOWING:
mbr/

Crl.MC.No. 6132 of 2015
---------------------------------

                                             APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:
------------------------------------------

ANNEXURE A-                    THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT REGISTERED AS
                               C.C.NO. 226/2015 ON THE FILES OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS
                               MAGISTRATE COURT, NEDUMKANDOM.

ANNEXURE B-                    THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
                               DATED 10-08-2015.


RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:                            NIL.




                                                                //TRUE COPY//


                                                                P.S.TO JUDGE


mbr/



                  B.KEMAL PASHA, J.
                 ================
               Crl.M.C. No. 6132 of 2015
           =======================
           Dated this the 1st day of October, 2015

                        O R D E R

Petitioners are the accused in C.C No.226/2015 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Nedumkandom, which has arisen from Crime No.162/2015 of the Nedumkandom Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324 and 506(1) read with Section 149 IPC.

2. It seems that only trivial injuries have been sustained to the de facto complainant, who is the 2nd respondent herein. The matter has been amicably settled between the parties and presently, the de facto complainant has no complaints against the petitioners.

3. The 2nd respondent has filed Annexure B affidavit affirming that the matter has been settled and he has no Crl.M.C. No. 6132 of 2015 2 complaints against the petitioners. When the matter has been settled between the parties, there is no meaning in proceeding with the matter further and therefore, Annexure A final report and all further proceedings in C.C No.226/2015 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Nedumkandom, can be quashed.

In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed and Annexure A final report and all further proceedings in C.C No.226/2015 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Nedumkandom, are hereby quashed.

Sd/-

B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE stu