Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

B. Mettu Rama Reddy (D) Th.Lrs. vs Union Of India . on 23 April, 2014

\216                                           1

                 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1995 OF 2008

B. METTU RAMA REDDY (D) TH.LRS.& ORS.                              Appellant (s)

                                         VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                              Respondent(s)

                           O       R       D      E      R

           Heard Mr. P.P. Rao, learned senior counsel for

the appellants, at quite some length.

2.         Civil Appeal is dismissed.

3.         In para 16 of the impugned order, the High

Court has observed:-

       "... in the Schedule the Survey number was
       corrcted by showing sub-division as 93/1,
       which is illegal (manipulation) and cannot be
       taken into account..."


4.         We    direct    that           while          proceeding       with       the

matter    pursuant    to   the           remand,             the   executing       court

shall also examine whether in the Schedule appended to

the    plaint    Survey    No.      93         has       been      interpolated      by

making it ’93/1’ at the instance of the plaintiffs and,

if it is found that the interpolation was made after

the plaint had been filed in the court, the executing

court shall register a criminal case under Section 466

and other relevant Sections of the Indian Penal Code
                              2

against the offender(s).

5.       No costs.



                               ..........................J.
                               ( R.M. LODHA )



NEW DELHI;                     ..........................J.
APRIL 23, 2014                 ( M.Y. EQBAL )
                                              3

ITEM NO.103                        COURT NO.2                         SECTION XIIA

                S U P R E M E       C O U R T         O F    I N D I A
                                RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                        CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1995 OF 2008

B. METTU RAMA REDDY (D) TH.LRS.& ORS.                         Appellant (s)

                    VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                         Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for production of additional documents and permission
to file additional documents and permission to file additional
documents and office report ))

Date: 23/04/2014     This Appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA
        HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL

For Appellant(s)          Mr.     P.P. Rao, Sr. Adv.
                          Mr.     V. Sridhar Reddy, Adv.
                          Mr.     Vineet Mishra, Adv.
                          Mr.     V.N. Raghupathy,Adv.

For Respondent(s)         Mr.     P.P. Malhotra, A.S.G.
                          Ms.     Vimla Sinha, Adv.
                          Mr.     Yasir Rauf, Adv.
                          Mr.     B.V. Balram Das, Adv.
                          Mr.     Nanda Kumar, Adv.
                          Mrs     Anil Katiyar,Adv.

                          Mr. Anoop G. Choudhari, Sr. Adv.
                          Ms. C.K. Sucharita ,Adv

            UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                                O R D E R

Civil Appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order.

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

(Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master (signed order is placed on the file)