Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt J Nagasravani vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2025

Author: N S Sanjay Gowda

Bench: N S Sanjay Gowda

                                       -1-
                                                   NC: 2025:KHC:10206
                                                  WP No. 3764 of 2025




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                    DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

                                     BEFORE
                   THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
                      WRIT PETITION NO. 3764 OF 2025 (LR)
            BETWEEN:

            1.    SMT J NAGASRAVANI
                  AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
                  D/O SRI J A CHOWDARY,
                  REP BY GPA HOLDER,
                  SRI VENKAT S REDDY,
                  S/O LATE REDDEPPA REDDY,
                  R/AT FLAT NO.254, GARDEN APARTMENT,
                  VITTAL MALYA ROAD, BANGALORE-560001
                                                           ...PETITIONER
            (BY SRI. SHESHADRI N S., ADVOCATE)

            AND:

            1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                  REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY,
                  REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
Digitally         M.S BUILDING, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDI,
signed by
KIRAN             BENGALURU-560001.
KUMAR R
Location:
HIGH        2.    THE ASSTISTANT COMMISSIONER
COURT OF
KARNATAKA         CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION,
                  CHIKKABALLAURA-562101
                                                         ...RESPONDENTS
            (BY SMT. CHANDINI.S., HCGP)

                 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
            THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE
            RECORDS AND TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
            02.12.2015 IN NO.LRF/79A/79B/C.R.149/2007-08 PASSED BY
            THE ASST. COMMISSIONER/RESPONDENT NO.2 AS FOUND
            ANNEXURE-A, IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND
                            -2-
                                       NC: 2025:KHC:10206
                                     WP No. 3764 of 2025




TO RESTORE THE REVENUE ENTRIES TO THE NAME OF THE
PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS PER
SALE DEED DATED 03.10.2006, REGISTERED ON 17.10.2006
AS FOUND AT ANNEXURE-B, ETC.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:   HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA


                      ORAL ORDER

1. The petition is filed challenging an order of vesting passed by the Assistant Commissioner under Section 83 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (for short, 'Act') on the ground that the purchase of the land by the petitioner contravened Section 79A and B of the Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that though the proceedings was initiated in the year 2007, the Assistant Commissioner did not conduct the proceedings for more than 8 years and the order sheet indicates that on every date of hearing the matter was adjourned on the ground that the Presiding Officer was unavailable. He also contends -3- NC: 2025:KHC:10206 WP No. 3764 of 2025 that notices of the proceedings were never served on the petitioner.

3. A perusal of the order sheet does indicate that though the proceedings was initiated in the year 2007, and not even for a single day till 2015 were the proceedings conducted.

4. On 25.04.2015 the matter was adjourned to 02.12.2015 and on that date an entry is made that the petitioner was absent and had not furnished documents and, therefore, the contravention of Section 79A and B of the Act had been established. Accordingly, the Assistant Commissioner has passed an order of vesting.

5. Since the entire proceedings have been conducted without hearing the petitioner, it is obvious that the said order cannot be sustained and has to be quashed. It is, accordingly, quashed. However, since Section 79A and B are omitted, the proceedings -4- NC: 2025:KHC:10206 WP No. 3764 of 2025 cannot be remanded back to the Assistant Commissioner and the proceedings initiated against the petitioner shall stand automatically abated. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, allowed.

6. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Sd/-

(N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30