Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Smt. Shanti Bai vs Union Of India on 7 December, 2021

Author: Nandita Dubey

Bench: Nandita Dubey

                                                                                1                             WP-26571-2021
                                                  The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                                                           WP No. 26571 of 2021
                                                       (SMT. SHANTI BAI AND OTHERS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS)


                                       Jabalpur, Dated : 07-12-2021
                                                 Shri Dharmendra Soni, learned counsel for the petitioners.

                                                 Heard on the question of admission as well as for grant of interim
                                       relief.
                                                 The petitioner No.2 is aggrieved by the impugned notice (Annexure
                                       P/1) dated 12.11.2021 whereby he has been declared as an encroacher on 768

                                       Sq.ft. of the Government land and asked to vacate his possession over the
                                       same failing which action under Section 257 of the Cantonments Act, 2006
                                       will be taken up.
                                                 The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that no
                                       particulars of the Government land on which he is allegedly have encroached
                                       was given and despite being asked for the details, the same has not been
                                       supplied till date. He apprehends that in the garb of this notice, his valid
                                       possession over Survey No.93/780-A will be disturbed.
                                                 It is further pointed out that an advance copy of this petition has

                                       already been served on Shri Anoop Nair, Advocate, who appears for the
                                       respondent No.3-Cantoment Board, Pachmadi, District Hoshangabad

(M.P.). However, despite his name being reflected in the cause list none had appeared so far.

Under the circumstances, let notices be issued to the respondents on payment of process fee within seven days by ordinary as well as RAD mode, returnable within three weeks.

Till the next date of hearing, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 12.11.2021 (Annexure P/1).

Certified copy as per rules.

(NANDITA DUBEY) JUDGE Signature Not Verified SAN sjk Digitally signed by SHARAN JEET KAUR JASSAL Date: 2021.12.08 11:21:17 IST 2 WP-26571-2021 Signature Not Verified SAN Digitally signed by SHARAN JEET KAUR JASSAL Date: 2021.12.08 11:21:17 IST