Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Anil Khanna vs Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi on 24 April, 2012

                CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                           Club Building (Near Post Office)

                         Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067

                                Tel: +91-11-26105682




                    File No.CIC/DS/A/2011/001347-RM



Appellant:                         Mr Anil Khanna


Public Authority:                  JNU, New Delhi


Date of Hearing:                   24.4.2012


Date of decision:                  24.4.2012



Heard today, dated 24.4.2012.



Appellant was present.



Public Authority represented by Mr Jit Singh, CPIO, Mr B.S.Rawat,
Executive Engineer and Officiating In-charge Engineering, Mr Jagdish
Singh, Administrative Officer and Mr Gopal Dutt, Draughtsman.



The parties are heard and records perused.



FACTS

It is noticed that vide RTI dated 13.8.2010 the appellant has sought the following:-

a) To inspect the letter written by him to the Engineering Department dated 30.8.206 and to be provided attested copy of the same, and
b) To inspect original papers/statements provided by the appellant along with his letter of 30.8.2006 and attested copies of the same.

2. The CPIO vide his letter dated 9.9.2010 informed the appellant that the original letter of the appellant dated 28.8.2006 was not available in the concerned file but photocopy of the same available with the Draughtsman, was being enclosed. The first appeal was decided by the Appellate Authority who vide his order dated 30.9.2010 reiterated that a reply to both the points had been provided by the CPIO. The first appeal was decided by the Appellate Authority who vide his order dated 19.10.2010 affirmed the decision of the CPIO.

3. Dissatisfied with the above order, the appellant has filed the present appeal.

4. The appellant, Shri Khanna submitted that he had put up papers to the office of the Executive Engineer, JNU, pertaining to renovation of toilets in the Jhelum and Sutlej hostels. In respect of both, he had submitted three deviation statements, No. 1, 2 & 3 in respect of both the works.

5. The CPIO submitted that the originals of all the six deviation statements could not be traced while the appellant vide his RTI had wanted to see the originals of all the six.

6. The CPIO is directed to make another effort to locate these documents and the hearing is deferred to Monday, May 14, 2012. In case the original documents are not traceable, the CPIO is directed to submit an affidavit to that effect.

Sd/-

(Rajiv Mathur) Central Information Commissioner Copy to :

(1) Shri Anil Khanna, III - K - 20, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi - 110 024.
(2) Shri Jit Singh, CPIO Jawahar Lal Nehru University, New Delhi - 110 067 (3) The Registrar/A.A. Jawahar Lal Nehru University, New Delhi - 110 067.

(Raghubir Singh) Deputy Registrar