Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Karnataka High Court

Arun R Naik vs Kumar Kiran Ganapathi Shet on 1 April, 2011

Author: Ram Mohan Reddy

Bench: Ram Mohan Reddy

                                   1




     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                                    CIRCUIT BENCH AT
                         DHARWAD

            DATED THIS THE   1ST   DAY OF APRIL, 2011

                         BEFORE

          HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN
                                        REDDY

                 R.F.A. NO. 1800/2006(PARI

 BETWEEN:

      ARUNRNAIK
      S/O LATE SRI R.R.NAIK
      AGED ABOUT 50 YRS
      ADVOCATE, R/AT NO.503 19TH MAIN
      ROAD 36TH CROSS 4TH T BLOCK
      JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE 41.
                                                APPELLANT (S)
       (BY SRI : SADIQ N. GOODWALA, ADVOCA
                                           TE)
AND

      KUMAR KIRAN GANAPATHI SHET
      AGED ABOUT 14 YRS
      MINOR REP. BY GUARDIAN
      MOTHER SMT VEDAVATI W/O GANAPA
                                     TI SHET
      R/AT BETKULI KUMTA TQ.
      U.K. DISTRICT 581343.

2.    KUMAR NAVEEN GANAPATI SHET
      AGED ABOUT 12 YRS
      MINOR REP. BY GUARDIAN
      MOTHER SMT VEDAVATI
      W/O GANAPATI SHET
      R/AT BETKULI
      KUMTA TQ.
                               2




      U.K. DISTRICT 581343.

 3.   KUMARI NAYAN GANAPATI SHET
      AGED ABOUT 8 YRS
      MINOR REP. BY GUARDIAN
      MOTHER SMT VEDAVATI
      W/O GANAPATI SHET
      R/AT BETKULI
      KUMTA TQ.
      U.K. DISTRICT 581343.

4.    SMTVEDAVATI
      AGED ABOUT 32 YRS
      HOUSE HOLD DUTIES
      KUMTA TQ.
      U.K. DISTRICT 581343.

5.    GANAPATI RAMA SHET
      AGED 37 YRS.,
      0CC: GOLDSMITH
      R/O.BETKULI
      KUMTA TQ.
      U.K. DISTRICT 581343.

6.    SMTKUSUMA
      W/O.SRIKANT SHET
      AGED 43 YRS.,
      R/O.HERVATTA,
      KUMTA TQ.
                                   RESPONDENT(S)

     (BY SRI J.S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R4; R1-R3
ARE MINORS REP. BY R4; R5 & R6 SERVED)

    THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DT.22.04.2006 PASSED IN
OS.NO.141/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDG
                                              E

                                            V
                               3




(SR.DN)  HONAVAR,  DECREEING    THE  SUIT              FOR
DECLARATION AND CANCELLATION OF DECREE.

    THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
                                            THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                        JUDGMENT

Memo is taken on record and the appeal is dism issed as withdrawn.

Sd/ JUDGE hnm/